Incorporated
Policy changes from this SAMM E-Change memo have been incorporated into the SAMM.
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 10/4/2019 | |
MEMORANDUM FOR :
DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR DEFENSE EXPORTS AND COOPERATION
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY FOR INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE, SECURITY COOPERATION ACCOUNTING
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS INFORMATION SERVICE
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
DIRECTOR, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
DIRECTOR, NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR INFORMATION ASSURANCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PROGRAM
SUBJECT :
Standby Letter of Credit, Defense Security Cooperation Agency Policy Memo 19-16, E-SAMM 425
REFERENCE :
- Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM), C9.9.1.5.4., Standby Letter of Credit.
This memorandum provides notification of the attached updated to Chapter 9 of the SAMM pertaining to Standby Letters of Credit (SBLCs). The Arms Export Control Act requires that FMS partners agree to pay full costs, including termination, owed under contracts into which the U.S. Government enters pursuant to FMS Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOA). The SBLC is a banking tool that FMS partners may use to guarantee contract termination payments under FMS LOAs. It is critical that SBLC policy and guidance effectively addresses processes, stakeholder roles and responsibilities, and terms and conditions to ensure successful management and implementation of SBLCs.
This SAMM update clarifies and standardizes how Standby Letters of Credit (SBLCs) are approved, established, managed, and terminated by updating the SAMM Section on Standby Letters of Credit (reference). This policy update also expands the category of banks that are eligible to issue SBLCs under DSCA's SBLC program to include U.S.-based foreign banks that hold a Federal License from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and meet the outlined eligibility criteria.
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact Ms. Danielle Ayers, DBO/FPA, mary.d.ayers2.civ@mail.mil, (703) 697-9407.
Charles W. Hooper
Lieutenant General, USA
Director
ATTACHMENT :
As stated
Attachment 1
Security Assistance Management Manual (SAMM), E-Change 425
Updates to C9.9.1.5.4. Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC).
Update C9.9.1.5.4. Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) and subsections to read as follows, and update remaining tables and figures accordingly.
C9.9.1.5.4. Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC). The DoD FMR, Volume 15, Chapter 4 authorizes the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) to approve an SBLC arrangement in lieu of Termination Liability (TL) prepayment requirements under an FMS program for Dependable Undertaking-eligible foreign partners. Under the SBLC, the value of the Purchaser’s TL is effectively guaranteed by a bank’s letter of credit instead of TL prepayments the Purchaser makes into the FMS Trust Fund or Federal Reserve Bank. The SBLC covers all implemented FMS cases for which TL applies. An SBLC does not cover other financial requirements owed to the USG (i.e. working capital). Foreign partners in receipt of and utilizing FMF grants are not eligible to participate in an SBLC in lieu of TL.
C9.9.1.5.4.1. SBLC Documents.
C9.9.1.5.4.1.1. SBLC. Eligible Purchasers may choose to use an SBLC issued by an eligible bank in lieu of TL prepayments. At the request of the Purchaser, the SBLC is a formal and independent undertaking issued by a bank to the DSCA as the "beneficiary" of the SBLC that specifies the duties of the bank and the rights of DSCA. The SBLC, in effect, serves as the bank’s guarantee of payment to DSCA in the event of partial or full termination of an FMS case by the Purchaser or USG.
C9.9.1.5.4.1.2. Memorandum of Agreement (MOU). The MOU governs the relationship between and the obligations of DSCA and the Purchaser concerning the establishment, review, modification, drawing on, and termination of an SBLC. The MOU must be negotiated and signed prior to SBLC implementation.
Figure C9.F5. - MOU Template for SBLC
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
|
Figure C9.F5. - MOU Template for SBLC - Appendix A
|
C9.9.1.5.4.1.3. Demand for Payment (Drawdown). The demand for payment is a document (in the form of an attachment to the SBLC) that would be presented by DSCA to the bank to demand payments from the issuing/confirming financial institution for the amount required by the USG, but not to exceed the amount of the SBLC.
C9.9.1.5.4.1.4. SBLC Status Report. DSCA (Directorate of Business Operations (DBO) Country Financial Management Division (CFM)) will maintain, monitor and track the issuance, activity status, and processing of all SBLC documents. On a quarterly basis, CFM will provide the CFO a report providing a status of all SBLCs.
C9.9.1.5.4.2. Rules and Dispute Resolution. SBLCs for FMS shall provide by their terms that they are subject to the International Standby Practices (ISP 98), International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 590, and shall be governed by the law of the State of New York and applicable U.S. Federal law. In addition, each SBLC shall contain a consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Federal courts located in the County and State of New York, United States of America, with respect to any disputes arising under the SBLC.
C9.9.1.5.4.3. Definitions. Unless specifically defined otherwise in the SBLC documents, the definitions for all terms stated therein are found in the ISP 98. For informational purposes, the following are key SBLC definitions derived from the ISP 98:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.4. Roles and Responsibilities.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.1. DSCA. The DSCA is the beneficiary stated on the SBLC and is responsible for calculating quarterly termination liability for each FMS program. Therefore, DSCA ensures the SBLC amounts are sufficient to cover termination liability every fiscal quarter.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.1.1. DSCA Director. The DSCA Director has overall responsibility for ensuring the successful implementation, execution and management of the SBLC program.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.1.2. Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The CFO provides leadership and policy guidance regarding the administration of the SBLC program. The CFO also signs all invitations for Purchasers to consider joining the SBLC program; approves or denies a SBLC application; and generally signs all SBLC documents on behalf of DSCA as the "beneficiary".
C9.9.1.5.4.4.1.3. Business Deputy for Country Financial Management (CFM). The Business Deputy for CFM is responsible for day-to-day financial management of the FMS programs. CFM will prepare all invitation letters; issue for release all SBLC documents; conduct negotiations and discussions with the Purchaser’s representatives and participating bank officials; recommend to the DSCA CFO whether an SBLC application should be approved or rejected; ensure adherence to SBLC policy; coordinate with Financial Policy and Analysis to update SBLC policy as necessary; notify DFAS and the Implementing Agencies when SBLCs are implemented and, to include confirmation as to which FMS cases an SBLC pertains; maintain a tracking mechanism to reflect SBLC activity; resolve issues that arise; keep the DSCA Director and CFO apprised of SBLC-related issues as appropriate; serve as USG contact for all SBLC related inquiries; and serve as overall coordinator for the SBLC program.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.1.4. Office of the General Counsel (OGC). The DSCA (Office of the General Counsel (OGC)) will provide legal counsel and advice to the DSCA Director, CFO, and staff on all matters pertaining to SBLC, as appropriate. OGC will review and coordinate on all SBLC documents, including revisions and amendments, to ensure legal sufficiency prior to a document’s issuance to designated parties for review and acceptance. OGC will articulate dispute resolution mechanisms. As appropriate, DSCA OGC will coordinate with DoD GC (Fiscal).
C9.9.1.5.4.4.2. Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). The Directorate for Security Cooperation Accounting (DFAS-SCA) is responsible for financial accounting of FMS Trust Fund transactions. With regard to SBLCs and Confirmations, DFAS-SCA will maintain copies of all demands for payment made by DSCA. If DSCA has not provided a copy of the Demand for Payment, DFAS-SCA will request a copy from DSCA to ensure sufficient supporting documentation exists for payments received in response to a demand for payment. When receiving a payment in response to a demand for payment, DFAS-SCA will record the deposit of funds from the issuing/confirming bank(s) to the Purchaser’s Trust Fund general ledger account (GLA) 1009 in DIFS; which will correspondingly impact the DIFS GLA 1001 as well. DFAS-SCA will verify that the drawdown amount received matches the demand for payment and notify CFM.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.3. Issuing Bank. Refer to the definition of "Issuer" and related rules contained in ISP 98 and Uniform Commercial Code Article 5. The effect of the SBLC is that the issuing bank has an independent and documentary obligation under the SBLC to pay DSCA, as beneficiary, against presentation of a complying demand for payment under the SBLC. Under whatever separate agreement(s) into which they choose to enter, the issuing bank and Purchaser will negotiate fees associated with the SBLC as well as any reimbursement or other underlying transactions required, which are separate and apart from the SBLC. Under no circumstances may articles delivered or services performed under the FMS program be used as collateral for securing arrangements associated with the SBLC. In the body of the SBLC, the issuing bank notifies DSCA as to the letter of credit number assigned to the specific SBLC.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.4. Confirming Bank. Refer to the definition of "Confirmer" and related rules contained in ISP 98 and Uniform Commercial Code Article 5. A confirming bank is necessary when an issuing bank alone will not suffice to meet DSCA’s eligibility criteria to provide DSCA with adequate assurance of payment. (e.g. The issuing bank may not have the necessary credit rating but the confirming bank may or the issuing bank may be located in a country that is not acceptable in terms of country risk but the confirming bank’s being located in the U.S. mitigates that risk.) A confirming bank takes the issuing bank’s promise under the SBLC and then under the Confirmation adds its own independent and documentary obligation under the Confirmation to pay DSCA, as beneficiary, against presentation of a complying demand for payment under the Confirmation. The confirming bank will also usually act as an advising bank to advise the terms and conditions of the SBLC to DSCA and to check the apparent authenticity of the SBLC. Under whatever separate agreement(s) into which they choose to enter, the confirming bank and the issuing bank, and possibly the Purchaser, will negotiate fees associated with the Confirmation as well as any reimbursement or other underlying transactions required, which are separate and apart from the Confirmation and the SBLC. Under no circumstances can articles delivered or services performed under the FMS program be used as collateral for securing arrangements associated with the Confirmation or the SBLC. In the body of the Confirmation the confirming bank notifies DSCA as to the letter of credit number assigned to the specific Confirmation.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.5. Federal Reserve Bank, New York (FRBNY). The FRBNY manages interest-bearing accounts for the deposit of national funds from some Purchasers. Should an SBLC be in effect for a given Purchaser that owns an account at the FRBNY, the Purchaser may request DSCA approval to withdraw all or some of the account’s funds which represent Termination Liability prepayments on or after the SBLC is implemented. In addition, the FRBNY account agreement can be amended to reflect the exclusion of TL as a component of "reserve funds" residing in that account, if appropriate. The FRBNY has no direct responsibility for the maintenance of any SBLC or Confirmation.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.6. Purchaser. The Purchaser may initiate a request to furnish an SBLC for FMS programs. All requests, either initiated unilaterally or in reply to a DSCA invitation, must be sent to the DSCA CFO in writing and signed by an official authorized to sign SBLC-related documents on behalf of the Purchaser’s government/organization. The Purchaser is responsible for paying to the issuing bank or confirming bank any/all fees associated with the SBLC or Confirmation. No fees can be capitalized or subsumed into the dollar amount specified in the SBLC or Confirmation documents. The Purchaser must specify to DSCA the issuing and/or confirming bank(s) it wishes to issue the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable, for the FMS program. The Purchaser is responsible for notifying DSCA in writing if and when it wishes to terminate its agreement with an issuing and/or confirming bank or arrange for a replacement SBLC or Confirmation. The Purchaser must sign an agreement with DSCA specifying the terms and conditions for an SBLC to be implemented to support the FMS program.
C9.9.1.5.4.4.7. Implementing Agency (IAs). Upon receiving notice from DSCA that an SBLC has been implemented for an FMS program, the IA will modify the payment schedule of the relevant cases to extract the TL component as a financial requirement owed to the USG. Likewise, should a given SBLC be terminated, the payment schedule may need to be revised to re-insert the TL component as appropriate. The IA will work with CFM to establish a reasonable, but specific timeframe to process the changes in TL status.
C9.9.1.5.4.5. Solicitation and Review.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.1. SBLC Secured Amount Determination. Prior to any formal solicitation for an SBLC, DSCA CFM, in coordination with DSCA FPA, will determine the required amount to be covered under the SBLC by calculating the TL requirements for the FMS cases associated with the SBLC and notify the Purchaser, accordingly. The Purchaser must request an SBLC for at least the amount calculated by DSCA CFM, and may also request a larger amount. This amount may be discussed with the Purchaser during the solicitation and review phases, but is not subject to negotiation per se as it represents a valid contingent liability. DSCA will notify the Purchaser of the amount that must be covered by the SBLC based on the TL requirements. However, the Purchaser may, in its SBLC application, request an amount higher than DSCA’s TL amount. The higher amount can be accommodated if executed via an accepted and implemented SBLC. DSCA will retain an audit trail specifying that the higher amount was due to the Purchaser’s request.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2. Solicitation.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.1. DSCA Invitation. DSCA may, at its discretion, formally invite in writing a Purchaser to participate in an SBLC for its FMS program. DSCA will only offer an invitation to Purchasers who meet the eligibility criteria specified in Section C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.2. The invitation letter shall specify the date by which a Purchaser must notify DSCA if it accepts the invitation, the amount of TL reserves that must be covered by the SBLC, and include samples of the SBLC-related documents. If a purchaser accepts the invitation, it must provide DSCA the full legal name of the issuing and/or confirming bank proposed for consideration; verification as to the desired SBLC amount; requested changes, if any, to the SBLC-related documents; designation of authority signed by a Ministry-level representative; and the preferred timeframe during which the SBLC should be implemented. This information is considered the SBLC application, and will only be reviewed for approval decision by the DSCA CFO when complete.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.2. Purchaser Initiation. Any Purchaser can initiate a request to participate in the SBLC for its FMS program. However, a request does not imply DSCA acceptance; please refer to Section C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.3. for eligibility requirements. The Purchaser’s request must include the following, at a minimum: the full legal name of the issuing and/or confirming bank proposed for consideration; verification of the desired SBLC amount; designation of authority signed by a Ministry level representative; and preferred timeframe during which the SBLC should be implemented. While the Purchaser can submit its desired SBLC documents for DSCA review, those documents will be subject to revision based on any perceived variances from the formats prescribed in Section C9.9.1.5.4.1.2. Memorandum of Agreement (MOU).
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.3. Eligibility Requirements for the Purchaser. Under any SBLC or Confirmation, the obligation to pay on presentation of a complying demand for payment rests with the issuing/confirming bank. The Purchaser remains liable to DSCA for its underlying obligations owed to DSCA but the balance the Purchaser owes will be reduced by any amounts paid by the issuing/confirming bank to DSCA under the SBLC or Confirmation. However, that does not remove the requirement for DSCA to conduct an assessment of the Purchaser’s stability or other factors in order to determine whether an SBLC or Confirmation involving that Purchaser can be accommodated. One risk mitigation factor is the stability of all parties involved in the SBLC and Confirmation. If the Purchaser is deemed to have a higher level of instability, that in turn could equate to a higher perceived risk of termination events within the FMS program that could, consequently, result in a demand for payment being presented to the issuing and/or confirming bank(s). Among the factors that DSCA may use in assessing a purchaser’s stability are: (1) its historical payment and termination track record with the FMS program, and (2) the Purchaser’s rating as assessed by the USG’s Interagency Country Risk Assessment System (ICRAS). ICRAS rating have has widespread application within USG agencies for determining lending eligibility, credit extensions, etc. The DSCA Director has authority to review the variables involved in any particular SBLC arrangement (e.g., Country, FMS Case, Specific Dollar Amount, etc.) to ensure there is no unreasonable risk to the U.S. Government. Lastly, programs funded with Foreign Military Financing (FMF) funds are not eligible to participate in this program.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4. Eligibility Requirements for the Issuing and/or Confirming Bank(s). The obligation to pay under the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable, rests with the bank(s). Extreme care shall be taken in terms of reviewing a bank’s eligibility for participating in the SBLC program for FMS by ensuring the bank is in good standing prior to implementation and post implementation on a quarterly basis. This will be done by DSCA/CFM in accordance with Section C9.9.1.5.4.22. Monitoring Requirements.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4.1. Eligibility Requirements for Issuing Bank. It is preferred that the issuing bank be a U.S. bank that is (1) Federally-licensed, (2) U.S.-domestically chartered, and (3) in an "active" status as reported by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Foreign banks that meet the eligibility requirements in Table C9.T14. and also use a U.S. Confirming bank may be considered as well.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4.2 Once bank status has been verified using the above requirements, DSCA will then confirm the bank’s credit ratings to ensure they meet acceptable thresholds. In short, banks must be rated at a mid-tier investment grade or better. To ensure consistent application, DSCA plans to use the available investment ratings from the Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and/or Fitch, rating service as noted in Table C9.T14.
Table C9.T14. Acceptable Credit Ratings
Acceptable Rating*: | Long-Term Rating | Short-Term Rating |
---|---|---|
Moody’s – Counterparty Risk Assessment | Aaa(cr), Aa(cr), and A(cr) | P-1(cr) and P-2(cr) |
Standard & Poor’s (S&P) – Issuer Credit Ratings | AAA, AA+, AA, A+, A, and A- | A-1, A-2, and A-3 |
Fitch – Issuer Default Ratings | AAA, AA+, AA, A+, A, and A- | F1+ and F1 |
*Note: When more than one rating agency provides a bank rating, DSCA may use the most recent rating to determine bank eligibility. |
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4.2.1. Use of long-term credit ratings is preferred to the use of short-term credit ratings. In addition to the bank rating criteria, the issuer and/or confirming bank must have an Outlook of Positive or Stable from the rating service(s). No exceptions for bank eligibility will be granted for banks that do not meet the standards outlined in Section C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4., its subparagraphs, and Table C9.T14. If the issuing bank fails to meet any of the criteria, DSCA will advise the Purchaser accordingly.
C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4.3. Eligibility Requirements for the Confirming Bank. In general, if the U.S. bank serving as the issuing bank is eligible, there will be no need for a confirming bank or a Confirmation. However, if the DSCA CFO approves the use of a foreign bank as an issuing bank, or determines it is in the best interest of the U.S. Government to secure additional credit support for the SBLC, then a confirming bank that is either a U.S. bank or U.S.-based foreign bank that meets all the criteria outlined in Section C9.9.1.5.4.5.2.4., its subparagraphs, and Table C9.T14. shall be required to issue the Confirmation. If it is determined that the proposed confirming bank is unsuitable then DSCA will advise the Purchaser that the proposed bank is not acceptable.
C9.9.1.5.4.6. Process Flow for Solicitation. The following events are shown in chronological order to depict the process pertaining to the SBLC:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.7. Notification of SBLC Application Decision. After reviewing the application based on requirements shown above in Section C9.9.1.5.4.5.2., DSCA will notify the Purchaser as to its approval/disapproval of the SBLC proposal. All approval/disapproval notifications must be in writing and signed by the DSCA CFO.
C9.9.1.5.4.7.1. Approval Notification. Approvals can be in the form of either approvals as provided (meaning there are no changes with the proposal contained in the SBLC application) or approvals as modified (meaning DSCA approves the package subject to required modifications). All required modifications must be clearly articulated in the notification letter. Note: DSCA will not unilaterally change the issuing and/or confirming bank(s) proposed by the Purchaser nor will it propose specific banks that might serve as suitable substitutes.
C9.9.1.5.4.7.2. Disapproval Notification. DSCA will notify the Purchaser if the package was disapproved, to include the specific reason(s) for not being able to accept the SBLC proposal. The disapproval notification will also state if there is a basis for approving the package if altered by the Purchaser (for example, proposing a different bank in order to meet acceptable eligibility thresholds).
C9.9.1.5.4.8. Acceptance Documentation. DSCA will inform the Purchaser in the approval letter that DSCA accepts the proposal (either as-is or as modified) and will send a copy of the letter via certified mail to the bank(s) at the address specified by the Purchaser. The approval letter will propose the specific date, time and location for the official acceptance of all SBLC and Confirmation documents, and will include a date by which the Purchaser and bank(s) are to confirm the date and time selected, the credit number(s) assigned by the bank(s), and insertion of text into the Terms and Conditions Agreement (for example, each bank’s address/contact for presentation of a demand for payment and the Purchaser’s designated authorities). Informal arrangements via telephonic or e-mail contact prior to the letter issuance are encouraged to expedite the acceptance process. The Purchaser and bank officials should reply to DSCA CFM not later than five (5) business days prior to the scheduled meeting time to reschedule or cancel that meeting. Appended to the DSCA letter will be the forms of SBLC and Confirmation (if applicable) reflecting any modifications made to the original version, and the Terms and Conditions agreement.
C9.9.1.5.4.9. Authorizing Officials. Except as provided for in Section C9.9.1.5.4.14., the following officials are authorized to sign SBLC-related documents:
Table C9.T15. SBLC Authorized Officials
Organization | Authorizing Official |
---|---|
DSCA/USG (Beneficiary) | The DSCA Director, Deputy Director or DSCA CFO may sign SBLC-related documents. Further delegation is not authorized. |
Purchaser | Designated by the Purchaser at Ministry-level. Ministry-level can also sign the Terms and Conditions Agreement and amendments without further designation. No formal acceptance may occur without submission of the designation of authority or if the designated official does not sign. |
Issuing and/or Confirming Bank(s) | Left to the discretion of the issuing and/or confirming bank(s). DSCA reserves the rights to demand proof of designation authorization and deny acceptance until such documentation is received, reviewed and approved. Such documentation may include a certificate of incumbency, specimen signatures and/or a legal opinion of in-house or outside counsel to the bank. DSCA may also require the use of an acceptable U.S. advising bank. |
C9.9.1.5.4.10. Documents Accepted. Formal acceptance occurs in the form of signatures affixed by designated officials on the following documents:
Table C9.T16. Formal Documents Accepted
Document | Number of Originals | Signatories |
---|---|---|
Original SBLC by the issuing bank | 1 | Bank official(s) |
Original Confirmation by the confirming bank | 1 | Bank official(s) |
Terms and Conditions Agreement | 2 | DSCA and the Purchaser |
C9.9.1.5.4.11. Acceptance Document Repositories. The document repositories for Purchaser and bank(s) are at the discretion of those parties. Repositories for the USG are
Table C9.T17. USG Repositories
Document | Responsible Office |
---|---|
SBLC (original) | DSCA/FPA |
SBLC (copies) | DSCA/CFM and DSCA/OGC |
Confirmation (original) | DSCA/FPA |
Confirmation (copies) | DSCA/CFM and DSCA/OGC |
Terms/Conditions Agreement (original) | DSCA/FPA |
Terms/Conditions Agreement (copies) | DSCA/CFM and DSCA/OGC |
C9.9.1.5.4.12. Process Flow for Acceptance. The following events are shown in chronological order to depict the process flow for acceptance of an SBLC:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.13. Implementation Criteria. The SBLC is binding when issued. Likewise, the Confirmation is binding when issued. The Terms and Conditions Agreement is considered to be implemented when all parties signed all copies of the documents and the corresponding SBLC and, if applicable, Confirmation is issued (with DSCA having received whatever proof of authorization it has requested in respect of such undertakings). At this stage, the process shall commence to notify applicable USG Implementing Agencies as to implementation and next steps required for existing and new Letters of Offer and Acceptance.
C9.9.1.5.4.14. Implementation Notification. Upon SBLC implementation, DSCA will engage specific organizations as follows:
Organization | Notification |
---|---|
Implementing Agencies | DSCA/CFM will send an official email that provides the SBLC implementation date; confirms the extent of TL coverage under the SBLC and, if applicable, Confirmation; and provides either a list of affected cases (or makes general reference to all cases to which TL applies). The email will also specify actions to be performed in terms of ensuring proper format of payment schedules on affected cases. |
DFAS | DSCA/CFM will send an official email that conveys the requirement to modify the means by which DFAS captures the payment schedule amounts into its DIFS system. Additionally, DSCA/CFM will notify DFAS of any changes that impact TL held in the FMS Trust Fund or the FRB resulting from SBLC changes. |
Purchaser | DSCA/CFM will send a letter that confirms implementation details of the SBLC-related documents. |
C9.9.1.5.4.15. Implementation Process Flow. The following events are shown in chronological order to depict the Implementation phase process flow:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.17. Events Prompting a Drawdown. A demand for payment under the SBLC or Confirmation may be completed by CFM and signed by the DSCA CFO after coordination with the DSCA Director or Deputy Director. The SBLC and Confirmation should each attach a form of demand to be used. DSCA may issue a demand for payment if any one or more of the following situations occur:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.17.1. The demand for payment may demand the entire amount of the SBLC or Confirmation (including any automatic amendment of up to 10% over the original amount when issued) or a portion of the amount. Multiple drawings, on either the same date or on separate dates, can also be made, provided those drawings taken together do not exceed the entire amount of the SBLC or Confirmation (including any automatic amendment(s) of up to 10% of the original amount when issued).
C9.9.1.5.4.18. Presentation. As a courtesy, DSCA will provide the Purchaser with a copy of any demand for payment presented by DSCA to the issuing bank or confirming bank. The presentation shall be made, at DSCA’s option, by any of the methods specified in the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable. No documentation other than the demand for payment shall be required for presentation to the applicable bank in order for that presentation to be complete. Under the terms of the SBLC or Confirmation, the bank cannot dishonor payment by demanding that additional documents be furnished by the DSCA.
C9.9.1.5.4.19. Sight Draft/Drawdown Honor. The terms of the SBLC and Confirmation (and, in the absence of specific terms, clauses or provisions in either of those documents, the ISP 98) govern the time frame by which a demand for payment must be honored.
C9.9.1.5.4.20. Application of Payment Received. The demand for payment shall specify the account into which the payment shall be remitted. Upon receipt, DFAS will ensure the payment is properly credited to the applicable FMS case(s). DFAS will notify DSCA/CFM via e-mail as to the date deposited and FMS case(s) credited within three business days of payment receipt. DSCA/CFM will acknowledge to DFAS via e-mail within one business day thereafter its receipt of the DFAS advice and confirm that it approves the payment application.
C9.9.1.5.4.21. Impact of Honor on SBLC or Confirmation Amount. To the extent DSCA has received payment of a demand for payment under an SBLC or Confirmation, such amount is deducted from the amount of the SBLC or Confirmation remaining for future payment. A bank’s obligation under an SBLC for a given Purchaser is finite in nature. For example, if the SBLC amount is $100M and a payment of $42M is made to DSCA, only $58M is available for subsequent drawings. An exception to this is if the SBLC amount is restored to $100M (or some other amount) via an amendment.
C9.9.1.5.4.22. Monitoring Requirements. DSCA/CFM will monitor the status of each SBLC and Confirmation for FMS on a basis not less than quarterly. This includes processes as noted in the following sections.
C9.9.1.5.4.22.1. Validating TL Requirements. Each quarter, DSCA/FPA will, in coordination with the DSCA CFD, determine whether the amount specified in the SBLC remains adequate to cover TL requirements for the portion of the Purchaser’s FMS program covered by the SBLC. This is in recognition of the dynamic nature of FMS programs. For example, during the period in which a given SBLC is active, many FMS cases may be implemented, many may close and many may continue to be executed – all of which may impact the corpus-level TL requirement.
C9.9.1.5.4.22.2. Tracking Mechanism. Each quarter, CFM, in coordination with FPA, will submit to the DSCA CFO a report to identify SBLC/Confirmation activity/status. On an annual basis (by 31 October for the fiscal year-end), a consolidated report will be forwarded from FPA to the DSCA Director. The annual report will include overall assessments and a recommendation as to any changes in the overarching SBLC policy that may be required to more effectively execute this program.
C9.9.1.5.4.23. Amendments. It is recognized that changes to any given SBLC or Confirmation while it is outstanding may be necessary. These changes could be prompted by the DSCA assessment that the amount should be adjusted, the Purchaser’s and/or issuing or confirming bank’s request for the same, changes in law, and changes in any terms and conditions acceptable to all parties. Regardless of the reason, all amendments must be approved by DSCA before they are accepted and implemented. This Section addresses the mechanics by which amendments will occur.
C9.9.1.5.4.23.1. Automatic Adjustment. The form of SBLC and Confirmation allows for one or more automatic amendments to the original amount for an aggregate amount not to exceed 10% over the dollar amount specified therein as originally issued. DSCA will send the request for amendment up to 110% of the original amount to the bank with copy to the Purchaser. The amendment shall take effect upon DSCA’s notice to the bank (in the form prescribed in the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable).
C9.9.1.5.4.23.2. SBLC Secured amount Adjustment.
C9.9.1.5.4.23.2.1. If the amount of the SBLC or Confirmation currently in effect needs to be increased beyond the 110% threshold, a non-automatic amendment would need to be processed. In that event, DSCA will notify the Purchaser in writing that an increase is necessary, and will allow the Purchaser 10 business days to reply as to whether the Purchaser prefers that the SBLC and Confirmation amounts be increased via an amendment or if the Purchaser wishes to deposit the required TL increment. If the Purchaser replies that an amendment should be processed, the Purchaser will submit in writing a notice to the issuing bank and/or confirming bank, with a copy to the DSCA. In that notice, the Purchaser will request the bank reply within 15 business days. The bank’s reply to the Purchaser and DSCA should either: (1) provide a formal amendment that indicates the bank’s willingness to raise the amount per the request; or (2) provide notice to Purchaser and DSCA that the requested increase to the amount will not be accommodated by the bank. In the event of scenario (1), the amendment will be accepted. In the event of scenario (2) or if no reply from the bank is received within 15 business days, the Purchaser will notify the DSCA and the increased adjustment will be captured in the Purchaser’s official billing statement from the next quarterly bill, until/unless a separate SBLC and Confirmation with a different bank for the increment is obtained. If the Purchaser does not pay the TL amount owed by the bill’s due date, then DSCA may sequester funds in the FMS Trust Fund to reserve the full TL amount.
C9.9.1.5.4.23.2.2. Decreases. If the TL validation performed in Section C9.9.1.5.4.19.1. above reveals that a decrease to the amount of the SBLC and Confirmation is warranted (e.g., the computed TL is more than 10 percent under the SBLC amount for two consecutive quarters), DSCA shall notify the Purchaser in writing. The Purchaser then has the option to either approve a decrease to the SBLC and Confirmation or leave the amount unchanged. The Purchaser’s response must be addressed to the DSCA CFO in writing. If no reply is received by DSCA within 30 calendar days of the date of DSCA’s written notice to the Purchaser, DSCA shall not send the request for decrease to the issuing or confirming bank. If the Purchaser approves the decrease, DSCA will implement the reduction in accordance with the procedures outlined in the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable.
C9.9.1.5.4.23.3. Expiration Date Extension. The form of SBLC provides that the SBLC shall remain valid until a specific expiration date as stated therein. The SBLC further provides for an automatic amendment extending it each year by one calendar year, unless notice of non-extension is given to DSCA in accordance with the MOU’s specified number of days in advance of the then current expiration date. The form of Confirmation contains a similar expiration date and automatic extension provision.
C9.9.1.5.4.23.4. Other Amendments. Amendments of a nature other than those described above must be approved in writing by DSCA. Such requests, to include those initiated by DSCA, must be reviewed on their own merits before a proposal to arrange for acceptance and implementation is made.
C9.9.1.5.4.24. Impact on LOA Payment Schedules. TL applies for purchases of defense articles and defense services made pursuant to Section 21 of the Arms Export Control Act. In the event no SBLC exists, TL prepayments are made as part of the financial requirements owed to the DSCA on each applicable FMS case. With an issued SBLC, TL requirements can instead be satisfied by the SBLC. The SBLC therefore impacts the USG’s financial requirements. Accordingly, the FMS case payment schedules must be adjusted to identify the revised amount owed to the DSCA (which equals the advance collection of funds needed to cover anticipated disbursements). Upon SBLC implementation, DSCA will notify the IAs in accordance with C9.9.1.5.4.12. For affected FMS cases, the IAs will ensure the LOA payment schedules reflect the following format:
| (1) | (2) | [(1)-(2)] |
Quarterly Payment | Total Requirements | Termination Liability | USG Financial Requirements |
Upon receiving the LOA documents reflecting the above payment schedule format and amounts, DFAS will load the "USG Financial Requirements" figures into DIFS. This will replace the "total requirements" figures currently shown in DIFS and, consequently, revise future financial forecasts and individual quarterly amounts due.
C9.9.1.5.4.25. Process Flow for Execution/Monitoring/Adjustments. The following events are shown in chronological order to depict the process flow pertaining to Execution, Monitoring and Adjustments:
|
C9.9.1.5.4.26. Transfer Provisions. The SBLC and Confirmation specifies the means by which DSCA can transfer its rights as the beneficiary. Only DSCA has the right to demand transfer of its rights under the SBLC or Confirmation; absent consent by DSCA, neither the issuing or confirming bank nor the Purchaser has authority to transfer the SBLC or Confirmation.
C9.9.1.5.4.27. Termination Provisions.
C9.9.1.5.4.27.1. Termination of an SBLC or Confirmation prior to its expiration date is subject to the written consent of DSCA. Consent to termination will normally result in DSCA either (1) issuing a demand for payment for the remaining TL covered by the SBLC and Confirmation prior to their termination, or (2) billing the Purchaser for that liability amount via an official billing statement prior to their termination. In the event of scenario (2) above, DSCA’s official billing statement will require payment from the purchaser within 30 business days of the request and the TL payment must be completed prior to termination of the SBLC.
C9.9.1.5.4.27.2. If either the issuing or confirming bank ceases to satisfy the eligibility criteria of the DSCA while the SBLC or Confirmation is in effect, DSCA will notify the Purchaser that such bank no longer satisfies DSCA’s requirements. DSCA may draw on the SBLC or Confirmation for the remaining amount of the SBLC or Confirmation, as applicable. DSCA may require another SBLC and Confirmation for the remaining TL amount to be issued by a bank that satisfies the eligibility criteria. Alternatively, DSCA will notify the Purchaser that TL prepayments in the amount covered by the SBLC and Confirmation (without duplication) must be paid within 30 business days of official notice.
C9.9.1.5.4.27.3. The Purchaser must maintain DU eligibility in order to be eligible to keep an implemented SBLC. If DU is revoked, the Purchaser will be notified of the status revocation, and upon this notification DSCA will drawdown the required TL amount from the SBLC or Confirmation prior to final termination of the SBLC and/or Confirmation.
C9.9.1.5.4.28. Closeout. Closeout of an SBLC and Confirmation can be prompted by its termination or expiration without extension. Within 30 days after either date (whichever occurs earlier), the bank(s) will be requested to submit to the DSCA CFO and to the authorized Purchaser official a written notice that confirms the SBLC and Confirmation were closed and that the bank(s) is no longer carrying this contingent liability on its books. Within fifteen days after receiving the bank’s notice, DSCA will send written confirmation to the Purchaser and the bank(s) that it has also closed the SBLC and Confirmation on its records. Written confirmation to the Purchaser will also include information on how future TL requirements will be billed until/unless a new SBLC is implemented. DSCA will notify DFAS and the IAs that the SBLC and Confirmation were closed and instruct (a) the IAs as to consequent payment schedule methodology and (b) DFAS as to the revised billing process. If DSCA executes a demand for payment that does not cover the entire TL amount required, the Purchaser will have 30 business days to ensure TL is fully paid as requested by DSCA.
C9.9.1.5.4.28.1. If the Purchaser requests that the SBLC not be extended, not later than 30 business days prior to the expiration date the Purchaser may request that DSCA either: (1) draw the entire TL amount from the SBLC or Confirmation or (2) make available funds for the TL prepayment amount for deposit into its FMS Trust Fund account. If the amount available under the SBLC or Confirmation is not sufficient to cover all TL funds required at the time of SBLC or Confirmation expiration, the Purchaser would be responsible for depositing that uncovered amount not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date.