Chapter 10, International Training, describes policies and procedures related to the provision of international training and education provided under security cooperation authorities.

Section

Title

C10.1.

Purpose

C10.2.

Authorities For International Education And Training

C10.3.

General Policies

C10.4.

Key Training Management Tools

C10.5.

International Training Management

C10.6.

International Military Education and Training Program

C10.7.

Training Under The Foreign Military Sales Program

C10.8.

International Military Student Screening Requirements

C10.9.

Healthcare Coverage

C10.10.

English Language Requirements

C10.11.

Invitational Travel Order

C10.12.

Dependents

C10.13.

Travel and Living Allowance

C10.14.

Training Tuition Rates

C10.15.

Suspensions and Cancellation of Training Programs

C10.16.

Regional Centers for Security Studies

C10.17.

Other Training Programs

C10.18.

Field Studies Program

C10.19.

Unauthorized Absence of Students

C10.20.

Other Student Administration

C10.21.

Annual International Training Reports

C10.22.

Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams

C10.23.

Post Training Activities

C10.1.1. The DoD provides education and training courses to foreign governments and international organizations at DoD military schoolhouses, DoD-contracted facilities and selected Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Coast Guard facilities.

C10.1.2. In this chapter, the term "training" refers to both education and training transferred to International Military Students (IMSs) through formal or informal periods of instruction in a classroom or field training environment, or via correspondence or other forms of distance learning and computer-aided instruction taught in the United States or overseas, unless otherwise explicitly stated. Although an IMS may be a U.S. citizen, generally an “IMS” is a citizen of the foreign government, with military or civilian status of that government, who is receiving education or training or is visiting USG activities under the sponsorship of the security assistance training program (SATP). Civilians are generally afforded the same protocol status as their equivalent military counterparts, as stated in the Invitational Travel Order (ITO).

C10.1.3. Training is an integral part of a total package approach (TPA) to building partner capability or capacity, and training must be considered when estimating delivery dates of equipment or resourcing any capacity building programs. Adjustments to deliveries may be necessary to ensure that foreign personnel have the training and skills to meet operational requirements. Training programs must consider the absorption capacity of the host nation; the availability of qualified personnel; the skills to be developed, to include English Language Training (ELT); and the time required to plan, implement, and complete any additional individual and unit training once equipment is delivered. The Joint Security Cooperation Education and Training Regulation (JSCET), Army Regulation (AR) 12-15, Secretary of the Navy Instruction 4950.4B, Air Force Instruction (AFI) 16-105), provides detailed descriptions of the programs and procedures listed in Chapter 10.

C10.1.4. In order to identify the applicable guidance in Chapter 10 that applies to a specific training activity or foreign student, you must know the specific legal authority and funding source for the proposed training activity. Identifying the guidance that applies to a specific training activity is determined by whether the foreign student's training will be funded by the student's own government (via national funds) or by USG funds via a security cooperation (SC)/security assistance (SA) Program.

C10.1.5. Eligible foreign governments or international organizations may purchase training with their national funds through the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. They may also obtain training using USG funds provided by SA appropriations such as the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program, Foreign Military Financing (FMF), and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO). SA Programs are further defined in Section C1.1.2.2.

C10.1.6. Eligible foreign governments or international organizations may also receive training through SC programs authorized in 10 U.S.C. and funded through DoD appropriations, such as the Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP) or other Building Partner Capacity (BPC) programs. SC Programs are further defined in Section C1.1.2.1. See Chapter 11 and Appendix 8 for more detailed information on individual programs.

C10.2.1. A summary of the legal references that guide the International Education and Training Program is in Table C10.T1. References for specific training programs are included in the paragraphs discussing those programs. Training can be provided to international personnel only through programs established under statutory authority.

Table C10.T1. Legislation for International Education and Training

Legislation

Subject

Arms Export Control Act (AECA), Chapter 2, Section 21(a)(1)(C) (22 U.S.C 2761(a)(1)(C))

Foreign Military Sales (FMS) for defense training

Pricing criteria (“full costs” or “additional costs” incurred by the United States)

AECA, Section 30A (22 U.S.C. 2770a)

Exchanges of training and related support

AECA Section 42(c) (22 U.S.C. 2791(c))

Offshore Procurement with funds made available under the AECA

AECA, Section 47(5) (22 U.S.C. 2794(5))

Definition of "training"

Brooke Amendment, (annual Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act);

Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), Section 620(q) (22 U.S.C. 2370(q))

Limitations on assistance to countries in default, twelve months (Brooke Amendment), and six months (FAA, Sec 620(q))

Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), Section 503(a)(3) (22 U.S.C. 2311(a)(3))

When the cost of salaries of members of U.S. Armed Forces (other than the Coast Guard) may be excluded from training funded under an assistance program.

FAA, Section 506 (22 U.S.C. 2318)

FAA, Section 552 (22 U.S.C. 2348a)

FAA, Section 652 (22 U.S.C. 2411)

Drawdown of DoD military education and training

FAA, Section 541 (22 U.S.C. 2347)

International Military Education and Training (IMET) may be furnished to both military and related civilian personnel, and Expanded IMET (E-IMET) may be furnished to civilians from ministries other than Ministry of Defense (MoD) and non-governmental organizations under stated conditions.

FAA, Section 544 (22 U.S.C. 2347c)

Exchange Training, Professional Military Education (PME), flight training, cooperative arrangements, etc. Reciprocity required.

FAA, Section 545 (22 U.S.C. 2347d)

Training in Maritime Skills

FAA, Section 607(a) (22 U.S.C. 2357(a))

Training of non-MoD civilians if in furtherance of FAA Part I

FAA, Section 636(g) (22 U.S.C. 2396(g))

Administrative, extraordinary and operating expenses incurred when furnishing defense articles and services and military education and training

FAA, Section 660 (22 U.S.C. 2420)

Training of Police Forces (prohibition and exceptions)

National Defense Authorization Act of 1991, Section 1004 of Public Law 101-510, as amended

Counter-Drug Training Support

10 U.S.C. 166a

Combatant Commander (CCDR) Initiatives

10 U.S.C. 401

Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA)

10 U.S.C. 407

Humanitarian Demining

10 U.S.C. 443

Imagery Intelligence and Geospatial Information (GEOINT): Support for Foreign Countries

10 U.S.C. 313

Bilateral or regional cooperation programs: awards and mementos to recognize superior noncombat achievements or performance

10 U.S.C. 321

Training with friendly foreign countries: payment of training and exercise expenses

10 U.S.C. 322

Special operations forces: training with friendly foreign forces

10 U.S.C. 345

Regional Defense Combating Terrorism and Irregular Warfare Fellowship Program (RDFP)

10 U.S.C. 2561

Humanitarian Assistance (HA)

10 U.S.C. 348

Aviation Leadership Program (ALP)

14 U.S.C. 1923

Foreign national appointment to the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Academy

C10.3.1. Combatant Duties. The Arms Export Control Act (AECA), section 21(c) (22 U.S.C. 2761(c)(1)), prohibits personnel providing defense services (including training) from performing duties of a combatant nature. Training and advising activities that may require U.S. personnel to engage in combat activities outside of the United States are prohibited.

C10.3.2. New or first time requests for potentially sensitive or lethal training under International Military Education and Training (IMET) and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programs must be staffed through the Security Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Combatant Command (CCMD), and the Military Department (MILDEP) to the DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)) for coordination and approval by the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) and the Department of State (State), Bureau of Political and Military Affairs Office (State (PM)). The request should include a description of the training requested, identification of the partner nation unit to be trained, rationale and justification for the training to include how this supports the CCMD Theater Campaign Plan (TCP), Country Team’s Mission Strategic Resource Plan (MSRP), and verification of Chief of Mission (COM) concurrence. A review and approval is required for each partner nation unit requesting this training, even if such training was provided to another unit in the requesting partner nation.

C10.3.3. Transfer of Training. Foreign governments acquiring training from the United States may not transfer training related to the use of U.S. defense articles or services to other countries or organizations, or to anyone not an officer, employee or agent of the purchasing government without the consent of the USG, nor can they use such training for purposes other than those for which it is furnished without the consent of the USG. The recipient country cannot use technical skills and information acquired through training programs to train personnel from a third country unless approved in advance by the USG. Requests to transfer training to third parties are submitted via diplomatic note to the Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfers (State (PM/RSAT)) for action, with an information copy to the DSCA (IOPS). Training transfer requests received by an Implementing Agency (IA) should be provided to DSCA (IOPS) for forwarding to State.

C10.3.4. Attendance in Classified Courses. Classified information may be released to foreign nationals only when authorized under the provisions of the National Disclosure Policy (NDP) and Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5230.11, Disclosure of Classified Military Information to Foreign Governments and International Organizations. Release of classified material must be in accordance with the policy in Chapter 3. When classified instruction is requested, the IA determines the classification of the material to be released during training based on the need-to-know, and disclosure agreements with the requesting country. The foreign government must affirm via written statement to the SCO the following: the government sponsors the International Military Student (IMS) to attend the classified courses; the IMS has been subjected to a security screening; the IMS is in possession of a valid security clearance at the appropriate level granted by the sponsoring government; the IMS does not constitute a security risk to the USG; the information obtained during the training will not be released to another nation without the specific authority of the USG; the classified information will be provided the same degree of security afforded it by the USG; and any involved proprietary information must be protected. When this certification is obtained, the applicable statement is checked in Block 11 of the Invitational Travel Order (ITO) (See sample of ITO in Figure C10.F6.) In general, an IMS is a U.S. citizen or citizen of the foreign government, with military or civilian status of that government, who is receiving education or training or is visiting USG activities under the sponsorship of the security assistance training program (SATP).

C10.3.5. A course of instruction may be preceded by prerequisite courses and/or followed by additional courses without the student returning to their home country between courses. When a student from a foreign purchaser is selected for training exclusively within the schools of a MILDEP, such training is requested in the program of, and administered by, the MILDEP providing the training. When a student is selected for training involving courses of more than one MILDEP, the MILDEP that provides the majority of the training serves as the IA. To determine the IA, count the number of weeks of training, and not the number of courses. English Language Training (ELT) should be excluded because this training establishes the capacity of the IMS to accommodate all follow-on technical training and the IA is always the same.

C10.3.6. Security Cooperation Education and Training Program Evaluations. Schools training IMSs under security cooperation (SC) programs may be directed to participate in student evaluations of these programs. The DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University (DSCU)) is DSCA’s activity that administers these evaluations. DSCU coordinates directly with military schools and the respective MILDEP SC Training Activities, notifying them of students selected to complete the evaluation forms.

C10.4.1. The Security Assistance Network. The Security Assistance Network Web (SANWeb) is the international security cooperation (SC) database and communications network that provides the Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs) and others in the SC community access to SC financial and logistics management systems, information via various bulletin boards, and a library system for large files. The SANWeb provides the primary interface for the input and output of data from all Military Departments (MILDEPs), SCOs, and International Military Student Offices (IMSOs). Most importantly, the SANWeb is where the SCO training manager obtains data used for the Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS). Other important tasks executed on the SANWeb include: maintaining current MILDEP country training manager and IMSO contact information and country profile information; generating invitational travel orders via SC-TMS; accessing training data from the MILDEPS; viewing remarks entered by IMSOs and MILDEPs; viewing current status of students; and submitting Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP) nomination forms. All SCOs and IMSOs must use the SANWeb and its components to perform their assigned SC training management functions. See Chapter 13 for more information on the SANWeb.

C10.4.2. Security Cooperation Training Management System. SC-TMS is located on the SAN. It is a software program that operates on a network and is used by the SC training community for the day-to-day management of training programs. Access to SC-TMS requires authorization by DSCA, Combatant Commands (CCMDs), or MILDEPs. SC-TMS capabilities include computer-generated Invitational Travel Orders (ITOs); International Military Student (IMS) information forms; training course database viewing and searching; reports, to include upcoming course start dates and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and International Military Education and Training (IMET) training program summary reports; modifying student data records; and automatic upload of IMS data to the SAN, to include student arrival information and detailed point of contact information for the SC training community.

C10.4.3. Training Military Articles and Services Listings. The Training Military Articles and Services Listing (T-MASL) is the master list of formal training available to the international community. It contains course descriptions, prerequisites, duration (in weeks), location, cost, international notes, special medical and health coverage information (e.g. medical paperwork required for Fast Track countries), dependent authorization, English language prerequisites and a training analysis code (TACs) signifying the type of training. See Table C10.T2. for TACs.

Table C10.T2. Training Analysis Codes and Worksheet Control Numbers

C10.4.3.1. The T-MASL must be updated on a regular basis and provided through the SAN. In addition to administrative updates of the information captured above, miscellaneous tables and databases, such as Expanded International Military Education and Training (E-IMET) courses, location codes, and Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) must also be updated along with the T-MASL.

C10.4.3.2. MILDEPS will restrict the use of T-MASLs that do not include all of the training information required by Section C10.4.3. through Section C10.4.3.1. Non-descript T-MASLs cannot be used for Mobile Training Team (MTT) events unless they are updated with information tailored to the specific training being proposed. See Section C10.22. “Security Cooperation Education and Training (SCET) Teams” for additional MASL requirements for MTTs.

C10.4.4. Worksheet Control Number. The Worksheet Control Number (WCN) is a four-digit identifier, used in conjunction with the training analysis codes, to identify each IMS or training team incorporated into a training program. The WCN is assigned when the MILDEP programs a specific course requested by a SCO for a given country. Sequential training programmed for the same IMS is indicated by an alphabetic suffix to the WCN and commonly referred to as a training line. See Table C10.T18.

C10.4.5. Standard Training List. The consolidation of requested training for a country is called a Standard Training List (STL). An STL is a list of a country’s training, by program type, by fiscal year for each MILDEP.

C10.4.6. Integrated Standard Training List. An Integrated Standard Training List (ISTL) integrates all of the MILDEPs’ training together by program, by fiscal year for a particular country into a single list. The ISTL is posted on the SANWeb and updated regularly.

C10.4.7. Invitational Travel Orders. The SC-TMS generated ITO is the controlling document provided to each IMS attending DoD provided SC training. ITOs containing the names of multiple students are not permitted. No IMS may enter SC-sponsored training without an approved and proper ITO. The ITO identifies where and when the IMS is authorized to receive training, provides the accounting information to pay for the training, and provides guidance for determining the extent of funded support, student status, and privileges that the IMS is authorized while attending DoD training.

Training international students is critically important to succeeding with the engagement challenges associated with security cooperation (SC) and Building Partner Capacity (BPC) efforts.

C10.5.1. General. The Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) is responsible for assisting the host country in identifying, planning, and programming U.S. training that will meet the country’s requirements, conveying those requirements to the appropriate Military Department (MILDEP) training activities, synchronizing training with other related SC activities, and adjusting plans as necessary. The SCO is also responsible for all of the administrative tasks required to send International Military Students (IMSs) from each partner nation to the United States for training or to bring training to the country.

C10.5.1.1. Planning. The SCO should make every effort to synchronize and sequence their training planning efforts to support the larger SC strategic and intermediate objectives to address gaps in capabilities through a multi-year plan. Properly sequencing training leverages grant program funding with partner nation funds. Ideally, the SCO should outline a multi-year training program that considers all International Military Education and Training (IMET) and other DoD and Department of State (State) grant funded programs to address approved training requirements; partner nation options for funding the training; identifying the location where training will be accomplished and who will conduct the training; as well as the country’s capacity to identify and screen qualified candidates within the restricted timelines required for many DoD or State grant funded programs.

C10.5.1.2. Combined Education and Training Program Plan. The purpose of the Combined Education and Training Program Plan (CETPP) is to assist the SCO in defining overall training requirements for all funding sources. The CETPP data, including the narratives, are used by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and DSCA to gain insights into the country training priorities and issues. The CETPP is developed by the SCO using the online Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS) which is located in the Security Assistance Network Web (SANWeb). Combatant Command (CCMD) theater security cooperation planning documents provide the SCO with a framework for the CETPP, and enable the SCO Chief or SCO Training Manager to ensure CETPP training activities fully support, and are included in the Integrated Country Strategy for the assigned partner nation. Figure C10.F1. provides an example of the CETPP.

Figure C10.F1. Sample Combined Education and Training Program Plan

C10.5.1.2.1. SCOs, in coordination with partner nation counterparts, must update their CETPP for planning use by the Military Services no later than 30 days before their CCMD annual Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group (SCETWG) or as directed by the CCMD.

C10.5.1.2.2. The CETPP covers the budget year and planning year (budget year + 1) and consolidates partner nation’s training needs from a joint U.S.-partner nation perspective. The plan considers all funding sources (e.g., Host Nation Funds, Foreign Military Financing (FMF), IMET, International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE), DoD Train and Equip Programs, the Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP), and all potential training sources (e.g., indigenous, third country, commercial, and other DoD and non-DoD USG-provided training). The CETPP is an important part of the SCO input to the military assistance budget process (e.g., FMF and IMET budget requests).

C10.5.2. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group. Each CCMD is required to host an annual SCETWG to address all SC and select security assistance (SA) training requirements for countries within its area of responsibility (AOR) to identify solutions to build stronger and more capable partners through synchronizing planning with country absorption capacity and resourcing of resident, non-resident and mobile training programs.

C10.5.2.1. The objectives of the SCETWG are to review and coordinate the CETPPs; address any strategic and operational training requirements for the remainder of the current and next budget year; finalize the budget year IMET and RDFP training programs for each country; discuss challenges and updates to international training policy, program, and planning issues; provide specialized SANWeb and SC-TMS instruction for SCOs and Local Employed Staffs (LESs) as needed; and the Defense Security Assistance Management System (DSAMS) “real-time” visibility to address corrective actions required by the SCOs to properly program the countries' IMET and RDFP training. In addition, CCMDs use the SCETWG as a forum to obtain End of Year (EOY) review input from the SCOs. See Figure C10.F2. for a SCETWG Checklist, developed to track the progress of each countries IMET program.

Figure C10.F2. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Checklist

Figure C10.F2. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Checklist

PDF Fillable form is available in SC-TMS.

C10.5.2.2. The CCMD will develop and coordinate its SCETWG agenda with DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) and the MILDEPs at least 90 days prior to the SCETWG. The SCETWG planning agenda should include a plenary session with focused discussions on international training focused planning and policy issues, and a programmatic session consisting principally of MILDEP centric panels focused on programming, verifying and validating training requirements/allocations. SCETWG Planning dates can be found on the SANweb front page under Training/SCETWG Messages Tab.

C10.5.2.3. Following a final line-by-line review, the output from the SCETWG is an approved (CCMD, DSCA and State), country plan for the remainder of the current year and the budget year for the programs reviewed at the SCETWG.

C10.5.3. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Attendance. Attendance will be controlled by invitation from the CCMD and limited to the minimum necessary personnel required to staff the Policy, MILDEP, RDFP and Resource Panels and address the training programs relevant to the countries represented at the SCETWG, specifically:

Table C10.T3. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Attendance

Step

Description

a

SCO attendance is required for review of USG-funded training programs and is normally limited to one representative per country.

b

LES attendance is authorized and encouraged, in addition to the SCO, when the CCMD determines that attendance is critical to the presentation and review of the programs. Attendance by the LES in lieu of the SCO requires CCMD approval.

c

Representatives from Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Security Assistance (State (PM/SA)), DSCA, MILDEPS (Including U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)), and other DoD Agencies responsible for education and training policy and representatives from field training activities who are responsible for the management and execution of country education and training programs may attend.

d

One representative from each of the Expanded International Military Education and Training (E-IMET) schools (Resource Panel).

e

MILDEPS may request that representatives from certain non-E-IMET schools be permitted to attend to address programs/courses developed to address CCMD specific country issues. (Resource Panel)

f

Requests for exceptions are approved by CCMDs in conjunction with DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

C10.5.4. Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Preparation. Prior to the SCETWG, SCOs and MILDEPs must validate the remaining training for the current fiscal year (FY), as well working together to create training plans for the budget year and the planning year. The use of the SCETWG Checklist, (See Figure C10.F2.), is encouraged, as well as monitoring the IMET Summary Report in SC-TMS to provide a current picture of IMET training. SCO training requests are programmed into the Defense Security Assistance Management System - Training Module (DSAMS-TM) by the Security Assistance Training Field Activity (SATFA), the Naval Education and Training Security Assistance Field Activity (NETSAFA), the Air Force Security Assistance Training Squadron (AFSAT), the U.S. Marine Corps Training and Education Command (TECOM) – Security Assistance Branch, and the U.S. Coast Guard, Directorate of International Affairs and Foreign Policy (CG-DCO-I), as appropriate.

C10.5.4.1. SCOs must make every reasonable effort to develop programs that will not require revision after review at the SCETWG. This is particularly true for training courses where quota availability is limited, where it requires short-notice deployment of Mobile Training Team (MTT) personnel from operational units, or where there are requirements for tailored curricula. SCOs should be aware of any change or cancellation penalties and consider the impact changes may have on the country training program or other related SC activities. Additional information on changing or canceling training, to include deadlines and costs, is in Section C10.15.

C10.5.4.2. SCOs must also ensure the completeness of the CETPP as well as adhering to the IMET program percentage breakouts for Professional Military Education (PME), E-IMET, etc. See Figure C10.F2. “Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group (SCETWG) Checklist” for details of current State IMET program planning requirements. Additionally, review the IMET Summary Report on the SANWeb: SC-TMS/REPORTS/IMET SUMMARY to assess daily updates of the country IMET program status.

C10.5.5. Following the SCETWG, MILDEPs will make any necessary adjustments and coordinate the training request with the appropriate schools or training organizations to confirm quotas, schedule, and report and start dates. Any subsequent changes to IMET funded course allocations approved during the SCETWG must be approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE), and remain within the country’s IMET allocation, and maintain the required percentage levels for PME, E-IMET, and technical/operation training.

C10.6.1. The International Military Education and Training (IMET) program is a Department of State (State) program, jointly managed by DSCA and State, that funds military education and training courses for international military, and related civilian personnel of foreign countries. It is a key component of security cooperation (SC), promoting regional stability and defense capabilities through professional military and technical courses and specialized instruction. IMET courses are provided primarily at military schoolhouses in the United States, exposing the International Military Student (IMS) to the U.S. culture, military students, practices, standards, and professionalism.

C10.6.2. Responsibilities.

C10.6.2.1. State has overall responsibility for the IMET program. Congress appropriates IMET funds each year under the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), and country allocations are justified and documented in the Congressional Budget Justification (CBJ) for Foreign Operations. Based on Congressional guidance and State approved country allocations, DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University (DSCU)) and DSCA (Office of Business Operations (OBO)) manages and issues the IMET funds to the Military Departments (MILDEPs) which further disburse the funds to support specific country program and/or courses.

C10.6.2.2. DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) provides IMET program implementation policy to the Combatant Commands (CCMDs), MILDEPs and Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs).

C10.6.3. Types of Training that may be Provided Under the International Military Education and Training Program.

C10.6.3.1. International Military Education and Training Program. The objectives of IMET-funded training are to encourage effective and mutually beneficial relations and increased understanding between the United States and foreign countries in furtherance of the goals of international peace and security, develop rapport, understanding, and communication links; develop host nation training self-sufficiency; improve host nation ability to manage its defense establishment; and develop skills to operate and maintain U.S.-origin equipment.

C10.6.3.2. Expanded International Military Education and Training. Expanded IMET (E-IMET) is a special category of training and education within the IMET authority. Under the authorization for E-IMET, military and civilian personnel are trained in managing and administering military establishments and budgets; in promoting civilian control of the military; and in creating and maintaining effective military justice systems and military codes of conduct in accordance with internationally recognized human rights. E-IMET objectives include contributing to responsible defense resource management; fostering respect for and understanding of democracy and civilian rule of law, including the principle of civilian control of the military; contributing to cooperation between military and law enforcement personnel with respect to counternarcotics law enforcement efforts; and improving the military justice system and promoting an awareness and understanding of internationally recognized human rights.

C10.6.3.2.1. Based on a determination of curriculum-content by the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE), in collaboration with Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Security Assistance (State (PM/SA)) where appropriate, courses that meet one or all of the objectives in Section C10.6.3.2., may be certified as an E-IMET course. The process and format to request certification or recertification of E-IMET courses or programs are detailed in Figure C10.F3. A list of approved E-IMET courses can be found on the Security Assistance Network Web (SANweb): Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS)/ Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL).

Figure C10.F3. Request for Certification or Re-Certification of Expanded International Military Education and Training Courses

C10.6.3.2.2. Courses that are certified as 100 percent E-IMET will be reviewed at five-year intervals. Courses that have less than 100 percent E-IMET content must be recertified every three years. If an existing E-IMET course/program significantly changes, it is the responsibility of the schoolhouse to resubmit that program for E-IMET review/certification.

C10.6.3.2.3. When countries are restricted by law or policy to E-IMET assistance only, English Language Training (ELT) and support, such as language labs, qualify as an E-IMET course. Military and related civilian personnel from countries whose IMET programs are restricted to E-IMET may only:

  1. Participate in stand-alone ELT,
  2. Receive English language support through the IMET program, or
  3. Participate in preparatory ELT associated with other E-IMET courses.

C10.6.3.3. Mobile Training Teams. The IMET program may provide training that requires U.S. personnel to conduct training in another country when the CCMD and DSCA have approved a policy waiver, or where a waiver exception exists. Training services may be provided in-country on a temporary duty (TDY) basis by a Mobile Training Team (MTT). To include such training under the IMET program, the CCMD and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) must approve a waiver prior to programming or making any offer or commitment to the foreign government. See Section C10.22. for specific management restrictions for MTTs.

C10.6.3.3.1. MTT requests under the IMET program should clearly demonstrate that the MTT is the best training option and that IMET is the only funding option. This includes U.S. Navy refresher training conducted outside the United States and its territorial waters. MTTs funded under the IMET program should support the train-the-trainer concept.

C10.6.3.3.2. E-IMET MTTs, including U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Maritime Law Enforcement Teams, do not require a policy waiver.

C10.6.3.3.3. The Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC) may conduct IMET funded in-country English language surveys without a policy waiver if the objective is to develop recommendations on where and how an in-country ELT program can be developed or improved.

C10.6.3.4. Postgraduate Education. IMET funds may be used for a maximum of two IMSs to obtain a postgraduate degree at non-Professional Military Education (PME)/E-IMET schools with the approval of State (PM/SA). Requests will be approved at the Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Groups (SCETWGs). Any post-SCETWG requests for Master’s Degree programs should be routed through the CCMD to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) SCOs are authorized to program the cost of a Graduate Record Examination (GRE) when it is required.

C10.6.3.5. Orientation Tours. The IMET program may fund orientation tours if the CCMD and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) in coordination with the Department of State, Bureau of Political and Military Affairs (State (PM)) have approved a policy waiver to pay with IMET funds. Orientation tours are limited to new country programs unless justified by extraordinary circumstances. When requesting approval for orientation tours or visits to U.S. military installations and activities, approval of the SCO Chief must be cited. Certification of the importance of the tour to the country’s training effort with supporting rationale, to include proposed itinerary and areas of interest, must also be provided. See Section C10.17.20.3. for additional information on Orientation Tours.

C10.6.3.6. The minimum duration of training in the United States that is funded under the IMET program is five weeks if all or part of the overseas travel is paid by IMET. If an IMET recipient country pays 100 percent of the overseas travel to and from continental United States (CONUS) training, there is no minimum duration requirement. When IMET pays for any part of trans-ocean overseas travel, training less than five weeks in total duration requires a DSCA policy waiver before being programmed. IMS in-processing and/or ELT are not considered part of the five-week requirement. This limitation does not apply to the courses listed in Table C10.T4., which are exempt from the 5-week duration requirement. Waivers may be submitted by the SCO, through the CCMD to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

Table C10.T4. Exempt Short Duration Courses

Courses/Schools

Implementing Agency

E-IMET Courses

Flag Ranked Courses

Orientation Tours

All MILDEPs

IMS Alumni Engagement-specific Events/Courses

All MILDEPs

Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC)

Army

Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School (NAVSCIATTS)

Navy

Air Force Physiological and Physiological refresher Training Combined Strategic Intelligence Training Program

English Language Instructor courses

Flight Safety courses

Inter-American Air Forces Academy (IAAFA)

International Intelligence Fellows Program

Air Force

DSCU School of Security Cooperation Studies (SSCS)

DSCA

C10.6.3.7. High-Cost Training. With the exception of PME and postgraduate education, IMET funds are not used for high-cost training (defined as any training or any single course of training with a tuition cost of $50,000 or higher). However, DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and the CCMD may consider a policy waiver for selected high-cost training on a case-by-case basis. A training course which costs $50,000 (the high-cost threshold) or less when planned but subsequently exceeds that threshold due to a price increase of not more than 10 percent does not require a waiver to the high-cost restriction.

C10.6.3.8. Training Provided by Contractors. IMET funds are primarily intended to provide DoD training. Training by U.S. contractors can be considered when the required training is not available within DoD resources. Such training requires a waiver from DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)). The Implementing Agency (IA) seeking such a waiver should coordinate with the other IAs and note in the waiver justification that the training in question is not available through any DoD source.

C10.6.3.9. English language training aids and equipment may be purchased with IMET funds. CCMDs may approve use of IMET funds to purchase language labs for non- Ministry of Defense (MoD) agencies when labs are to be used for training of civilians to attend E-IMET programs.

C10.6.3.10. Technical Training. Although technical training can be accomplished under IMET, it should be a minimal component of the overall program. IMET can be used for: technical training necessary to support significant host-country military deficiencies; training that promotes in-country sufficiency of training instructors; and training to enable the IMS to acquire skills necessary to participate in peace support operations. Generally, this type of training is funded via a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case. If technical training is not a small component of the overall program, contact DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) for questions regarding technical training using IMET funds.

C10.6.4. Personnel Authorized to be Trained Under International Military Education and Training.

C10.6.4.1. Career Personnel. Personnel trained under the IMET program are selected from career personnel likely to occupy key positions in the foreign country's defense establishment. This is mandatory for attendance at professional level schools, (e.g., command and staff or equivalent and higher, and college level) except when authorized by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (SPP).

C10.6.4.2. Military. IMET-funded training may be provided to military personnel from the host nation’s defense establishment.

C10.6.4.3. Civilians.

C10.6.4.3.1. International Military Education and Training. Civilian personnel who are not members of the requesting country’s defense establishment or armed forces are not eligible for traditional IMET training but may be trained under the subset of programs approved as meeting the E-IMET criteria.

C10.6.4.3.2. Expanded International Military Education and Training. Civilians and military personnel who work in the country’s MoD are eligible for training under E-IMET. E-IMET may also be used to train foreign governmental personnel of ministries other than the MoD, legislators, and individuals who are not members of the government, when the military education and training would contribute to the E-IMET objectives. Training of defense civilians for the express purpose of teaching, developing, or managing in-country ELT programs is also authorized. Defense civilians in counternarcotics-related areas may also be trained under the E-IMET program. Maritime law enforcement and other maritime skills training for personnel in non-defense or agencies which perform a maritime law enforcement mission are authorized.

C10.6.4.4. Training of Police Forces. FAA Section 660 (22 U.S.C. 2420) does not permit training of police forces or law enforcement forces although there may be limited exceptions; contact DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) for questions regarding exceptions. Neither the name given to a unit by the foreign government nor the ministerial authority under which it operates is sufficient to determine whether a particular force is a “police unit.” The determining factor is the nature of the function performed by the person or that person’s unit.

C10.6.4.4.1. Military Police Training. IMET funded Military Police (MP) training for MP and non-police personnel and units is permitted but requires that an appropriate host nation official certify that the skills learned in MP training programs are applied as part of the student’s military function, rather than in a civilian law enforcement function. See certification requirements in Section C10.6.4.4.2.

C10.6.4.4.2. Certification. SCOs must certify to State (PM/SA) that an individual attending MP training: 1) does not currently conduct civilian law enforcement functions; and 2) will not be involved in any civilian law enforcement activities for a period of two years following return from U.S. funded IMET training. Certifications must be accompanied by an English translation if in a language other than English; include student name and rank, course title, T-MASL identification number, host nation service name, function and role, and Worksheet Control Number (WCN); and be signed by appropriate host nation official. They must be maintained on file by the SCO for a minimum of three years. A copy of the certification must be provided to State (PM/SA), DSCA, and the CCMD prior to sending the student to training. Failure to provide certification may result in last minute training cancellations and loss of IMET funding. The following is an example of certification statement:

The Government of [insert country] certifies that [insert student rank and name], who is scheduled to attend [insert course title and/or Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) Identification (ID)] under Worksheet Control Number (WCN) [insert number], is a member of [insert host nation service]. [insert student rank and name] does not currently conduct law enforcement functions and will not be involved with or assigned to a unit performing in any civilian law enforcement functions for a period of at least two years following completion of training listed above.

C10.6.5. Types of Training that May Not Be Provided under the International Military Education and Training Program. Table C10.T5. illustrates the types of training that cannot be provided under the IMET program. These restrictions apply only to training funded through the IMET program and will be adjusted to reflect the current language in the State IMET Grant-Military Assistance Guide (G-MAG). Any request for exception must be submitted through the CCMD to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

Table C10.T5. Types of Training Not Provided Under IMET

#

Types Of Training Not Provided Under IMET

1

Training not related to accomplishment of the objectives of the IMET program;

2

Initial or technical training in support of FMS-purchased equipment (provided under an FMS case) (See Section C10.6.3.10.)

3

Training of non-career military personnel

4

Training in skills normally available in-country, exclusive of PME

5

Training already provided in a quantity which, taking into account reasonable attrition, is sufficient to meet requirements of the requesting country

6

Funding for courses conducted on DoD installations outside the United States, including Non-commissioned Officer (NCO) Academies or other PME courses without approval of DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) Justification must specify that a similar course IS NOT provided in the United States.

7

Funding an IMS to attend a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) school or a foreign military school, (e.g., Niger using U.S. funds to send a Niger student to a German Military Academy).

8

Training which appears unlikely to produce skills that would be properly used by the requesting country.

9

Repetitive training in the same courses. For example, SCOs should include no more than five of the same technical course, no more than ten of the same PME course in their IMET program, and no more than two master’s degree courses (excluding PME/E-IMET courses), per fiscal year. (Note: All requests for IMET funded Master’s degree programs require State (PM/SA) approval).

10

Training at U.S. civilian schools not qualifying for inclusion in accordance with FAA, section 541 (22 U.S.C. 2347)

11

Sniper training

12

ELT not in support of the in-country ELT program or in support of specific U.S. follow-on training

13

Foreign language training

14

Purchase of training aids other than English language equipment or materials, books and publications

15

Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL), including Distance Learning (DL), correspondence courses, other forms of outside of the continental United States (OCONUS) distance/distributed learning courses or satellite/remote courses that are not part of a training pipeline that includes a resident phase in CONUS, unless approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE);

16

Training to support national intelligence programs.

The scope of military intelligence training available to international students is limited to that directly related to combat or operational intelligence. Tactical intelligence training programs are not extended to include training in support of national intelligence programs of foreign countries. Requests for intelligence training are reviewed by the IA to ensure compliance with this paragraph. Other potentially sensitive training requests should be addressed to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE);

17

Flight Training

18

Musical or Band Leader courses

C10.6.6. Defining Training Requirements. CCMDs submit recommended annual IMET budget request levels, utilizing the FMF/IMET Budget Formulation and Submission Tool, to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). The country team provides a similar recommendation to State through the Mission Strategic Resource Plan (MSRP). SCOs and CCMDs must ensure requirements submitted through the separate DoD and State channels are consistent with one another. Through this process proposed IMET allocations are determined by State for each IMET eligible country for inclusion in the annual CBJ.

C10.6.6.1. At each CCMD SCETWG, IMET training requirements that have been programmed into Defense Security Assistance Management System - Training Module (DSAMS-TM) by the MILDEPs for the current fiscal year (FY) (to include one-year, two-year, x-year, and de-obligation/re-obligation IMET) and budgetFY (next FY) are reviewed by the CCMD, State, DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and the SCO to ensure the appropriateness of IMET funding. State, DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and CCMD approve the resulting country budget year IMET training programs. See Section C10.5.4. “Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group Preparation” for additional info.

C10.6.6.2. DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD FMR) 7000.14-R, Volume 15, Chapter 7 provides detailed information on pricing training provided under the IMET program.

C10.6.6.3. Apportionment. Once Congress appropriates funding in the Foreign Operations Budget (150 Account), State (PM) and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) request a country by country apportionment from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). After OMB apportions the funds, DSCA (OBO) initiates IMET account management, and requests fund transfer from the U.S. Treasury to the IAs. If the amounts are increased from those in the CBJ, State is required to notify Congress.

C10.6.6.4. Prioritization. Actual IMET allocations are often less than that requested by the SCO and are announced well after the start of the fiscal year, and additional funds can be obtained in an End of Year (EOY) reallocation of funds; therefore, SCOs must prioritize training during planning and be prepared to revise plans and re-prioritize training requests late in the fiscal year. To assist in the prioritization and management of IMET training requests, the SC training community uses Priority Codes for training courses. SCOs assign Priority Codes as follows:

C10.6.6.4.1. Priority Code "A" indicates the lines of training that are within planned and expected funding for that country. This code also applies to the Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP).

C10.6.6.4.2. The IAs fund Priority Code “A” training lines within the apportioned allocation level. SCOs ensure Priority Codes are appropriately adjusted so that the total of all Priority Code “A” training lines does not exceed the countries allocation level. Priorities must be adjusted if the allocation/apportionment level is different than the budget request level. If subsequent changes cause the “A” priorities to exceed the country allocation level, the SCO should submit requests to the IAs to change the Priority Codes of selected “A” priority lines to Priority Code “D.” If lines are already funded, the MILDEP must withdraw funding of those lines but may retain the training requirements in the program in an unfunded status.

C10.6.6.4.3. Priority Code “B” indicates the lines of training that will start in the first quarter of the following fiscal year (October 1st to December 31st) and should be considered in the current fiscal year for EOY reallocation of IMET funds. For RDFP funding, priority “B” indicates an event not funded through one of the MILDEPs but from funding that is released from DSCA directly to a CCMD or a DoD Regional Center (RC).

C10.6.6.4.4. Priority Code “C” is not used.

C10.6.6.4.5. Priority Code “‘D” is assigned to other valid training requirements taking place after the third quarter, which are in excess of the budget level. This value should not exceed 10 percent of the budget level.

C10.6.6.4.5.1. Priority Code “D” is defined as training that is consistent with IMET policies and objectives; and IAs can accommodate, and host nation can provide qualified candidates if funds become available. During the annual SCETWG, all Priority Code “D” in the current year IMET program should either be cancelled or changed to “B” to be considered for EOY reallocation of IMET funds.

C10.6.6.5. International Military Education and Training Budget Execution. Funds must be obligated by the end of the fiscal year. MILDEPs must coordinate with SCOs to confirm student quotas and schedule report and/or start dates.

C10.6.6.6. End of Year International Military Education and Training Reallocations.

C10.6.6.6.1. The cut-off for current-year program changes to IMET ends four weeks prior to the annual (July) EOY financial review at DSCA. Precise dates, guidance and formats for the financial review are announced at each SCETWG. Only changes justified as an urgent requirement are considered after the cut-off date. These changes must be approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) prior to submission, and approval is contingent upon sufficient time remaining to process the change and obligate funds before the annual financial review. CCMD priorities for year-end funding must be received at DSCA, in the format prescribed by DSCA (OBO) no later than two weeks before the financial review for consolidation and consideration by State for year-end funding. At the conclusion of the EOY financial review, the results are considered final.

C10.6.6.6.2. International Military Education and Training reallocation process. Table C10.T6. shows the steps in the EOY IMET reallocation process. All EOY IMET funding requirements must have a Priority Code of “B” in the Standard Training List (STL) and a start date between October 1st and December 31st. All “B” priority training codes are changed to “A” if, and after, they are funded.

Table C10.T6. End of Year International Military Education and Training Reallocation Process

Date* Specific Dates for Each Year are Provided at the Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group

Action

March - June

CCMDs provide comments and recommendations concerning the status of individual country IMET allocation levels to the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) at the annual SCETWGs. SCOs use the SCETWGs to validate requirements for additional funds with the IAs before presentation to CCMDs.

Four weeks prior to annual EOY financial review

Input is submitted by the SCOs to CCMDs prioritizing each country’s requirements for EOY funds, and all changes to country STL cease. CCMDs ensure that SCOs submit appropriate program additions or other changes reflecting Priority Code “B” and confirmation of quota availability. Any courses that a SCO adds to its STL after submitting requirements to its CCMD, must be coordinated with the CCMD or it cannot be considered for EOY funds. All courses that do not have confirmed dates are deleted by the MILDEPs in preparation for the IMET scrub meeting. MILDEPs will ensure all funding amounts reflected are correct and limit funding adjustments to the program.

Two weeks prior to annual EOY financial review

CCMDs submit program change input in the prescribed format to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO)

CCMDs submit prioritized countries and courses, with justifications and the total cost of each course.

End of July

The IMET review meeting takes place. A list of all country requirements for EOY funds is prepared including the CCMD priorities.

DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) meets with MILDEP financial representatives to identify excess funds and makes recommendations on which countries and courses require funding, based on CCMD priorities.

State confirms its final decision on reallocations. EOY courses may not be changed by exception once State has made the final decision on reallocations.

Mid August

The 15 day Notification is sent to Congress.

September 30th

All approved EOY requirements are obligated by MILDEPs.

C10.6.6.7. Out-of-Cycle International Military Education and Training Reallocations. Unique circumstances may arise within a given fiscal year requiring an out-of-cycle regional IMET reallocation. Such requirements are handled as a case-by-case basis.

C10.6.7. Requests for International Military Education and Training Policy Waivers. Policy waiver requests will be reviewed and considered during the program review portion at the CCMD’s SCETWG. Requests include complete justification and a written statement of SCO Chief’s concurrence. Requests submitted outside the SCETWG are addressed by the SCO to the CCMD with an information copy to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and the appropriate IA. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and the CCMD jointly respond to the SCO request with information copy to appropriate IA. Figure C10.F4. provides the format for waiver requests. A fillable PDF version is available in SC-TMS/FORMS.

Figure C10.F4. International Military Education and Training Waiver Request Format

PDF Fillable form is available in SC-TMS.

C10.6.8. Employment of International Military Education and Training Graduates. SCOs must obtain appropriate assurances that personnel trained under the IMET program are properly and effectively employed in the skill received from the training for a period of time sufficient to warrant the expense to the United States. The optimum assignment periods are three years for senior PME training, post graduate programs, and two years for other training, including mid-level PME and instructor training. How IMET graduates are retained and assigned should be annotated in the country Combined Education and Training Program Plan (CETPP).

C10.6.9. Approved International Military Education and Training Sites. Under the FAA, section 541 (22 U.S.C. 2347), IMET-funded training may be provided through attendance at military educational and training facilities in the United States (other than Service Academies and Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Programs); attendance in special courses of instruction at schools and institutions of learning or research in the United States; and participation in observation and orientation visits to military facilities and related activities in the United States. See Table C10.T5. for restrictions on courses or activities conducted outside the United States.

C10.6.10. Travel for International Military Education and Training Students. IMET funds may be used to pay for IMS travel as specified in this paragraph. Partner nations are encouraged to assume the cost of transportation for their IMS to the maximum extent possible so that IMET funds are used for higher numbers of IMS to attend training.

C10.6.10.1. Travel within Student’s Country. The IMET program does not pay travel costs of IMS traveling within their own country.

C10.6.10.2. Travel of International Military Education and Training Students to Non-Resident Security Cooperation Organization Officer. SCOs responsible for managing an IMET program for a country in which a SCO Officer is not resident may program IMET IMS transportation to or from that SCO Officer’s location for briefings. This assumes there is no U.S. representation in the IMET IMS’ country that could provide the service and the Country Team supports the request. This does not apply to countries that pay for their own expenses.

C10.6.10.3. Use of Foreign Flag Carriers. Whenever possible, SCOs in countries which have national flag carriers with routes to or part way to the United States are encouraged to obtain an agreement from the host nations to transport its respective IMS on such carriers at no cost to the United States.

C10.6.10.4. Modes of Transportation. When travel between the IMS’s home country and the training facility is being paid with IMET funds, transportation uses the most direct route, except as specified below.

C10.6.10.4.1. Travel to and from Continental United States via United States Military Aircraft. IMSs are authorized to travel by U.S. military aircraft with an approved Invitational Travel Order (ITO). Transportation of the IMS, including those whose country elects to pay the cost of the transportation, is at common user rates.

C10.6.10.4.2. Travel to and from the Continental United States via United States Commercial Sources. Travel to or from the United States must be via U.S. flag carrier to the fullest extent feasible. When the use of U.S. transportation for the entire trip does not permit the IMS to meet course or class convening dates, combinations of non-U.S. commercial air or surface common carrier (tourist class) and USG flag carrier is allowed. When this combination is used, U.S. flag carrier is used to the fullest extent possible for the return travel to the home country. If a U.S. flag carrier is not available, U.S. Embassy (travel office/agent) is to provide a certificate of non-availability. See Section C10.13.5. for information regarding authorization to purchase roundtrip travel.

C10.6.10.4.3. Travel within the Continental United States. Transportation to and from training installations within the United States is by surface common carrier or commercial aircraft. Travel by privately-owned vehicle may be authorized when it is in the interest of the USG as indicated by the SCO on the ITO.

C10.6.10.5. Travel with Dependents. DoD and State funded training programs, including IMET, do not fund dependent travel. See Section C10.12. “Dependents” for additional information.

C10.6.10.6. Travel for Emergency Leave. The IMS or his/her government must pay the round-trip transportation cost to return home on emergency leave if the IMS is to return to the United States to continue training.

C10.6.10.7. Deviations from Planned Travel Routes. When an IMS is permitted by his/her government to deviate from the most direct route U.S. sponsorship terminates at the point and time of such deviation. If an IMS chooses to remain at a point en route home beyond the time required to make travel connections, IMET funds must not be used to pay for allowances during that excess time. The IMS or their government is responsible for any additional financial charges incurred due to changes in travel routes. An IMS who does not adhere to scheduled return flights is not the responsibility of the USG. If the IMS ITO authorizes the IMS leave after graduation, and it is more cost effective for the IMS to travel back to home country from his/her leave location, the IMS is authorized to receive transportation from that leave location to their home country.

C10.6.10.8. En route Accommodations. Accommodations on U.S. installations provided to IMS en route are commensurate with those provided U.S. personnel of equivalent grade.

C10.6.10.9. International Military Education and Training Funded Travel. When the IMET program pays for travel, the IMS is entitled to living allowances during travel status, to include the day of departure from home country, through the day of arrival at their first training location. After training, living allowance in a travel status resumes the day of departure for home country, excluding any leave period authorized by the IMS’s government following termination of training or any unauthorized delay en route. An IMS is not authorized IMET-funded travel allowance for any portion of travel paid by their government. Living allowances are computed incrementally in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) rules for U.S. military personnel on TDY on the day of departure from home country and the day of arrival in home country.

C10.6.10.9.1. International Military Students’ Government Funded Travel. An IMS, whose travel expense to the United States is paid by their own government, is entitled to IMET-funded living allowances while in a travel status, to include the day of departure from the U.S. entry port en route to the training location, through the day of arrival at the training location. Living allowance in a travel status resumes the day of departure from the last training location and includes the day of arrival at the U.S. departure point. These living allowances are paid at the full locality rate for each day that a living allowance is payable.

C10.6.11. Privileges for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Students. IMS and authorized dependents on ITOs are extended Commissary, Exchange, and similar privileges ordinarily available to U.S. military personnel of similar rank, when approved by the IA. The equivalent rank assigned in the ITO must be based on the U.S. grade structure rather than rank title of the foreign country.

C10.6.12. In the event of death of an IMET IMS, funds for preparation of remains and repatriation are programmed under generic code N7F on a case-by-case basis after DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) approval.

C10.6.13. International Military Education and Training General Costs and Infrastructure Funds. The following policy guidelines apply to the authorized use of IMET program general costs and infrastructure funds, DSCA fund codes 66 and 77. Waivers from this policy require DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) approval.

C10.6.13.1. General Costs (Fund Code 66). General costs include both program development and course development. These funds are managed by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) Requests, including justification, for these funds should be provided to both DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) for coordination. All work on new programs and courses funded by IMET must be approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) prior to starting work (e.g., planning and developing new curriculum for new program or new courses).

C10.6.13.2. Program Development. Program development includes work such as the creation of, or major changes to, a program. For example, work done to determine which courses need to be included and developed to start a new Master’s program is categorized as program development.

C10.6.13.3. Course Development. After a program is identified and justified as needed, funding to develop the details for the course(s) should be requested as course development. Course development is not country specific. Course development work includes additions to or updating of courses.

C10.6.13.4. Infrastructure Costs (Fund Code 77). The cost of operating the E-IMET schools and the Mobile Education Team (MET) training programs are categorized as infrastructure costs. Infrastructure fund requests from each E-IMET school should be developed based on the cost incurred if all training were IMET funded. These costs are then reduced where other sources of funds (e.g., RDFP or FMS case funds) pay for costs of program development, course development, and actual course offerings. Infrastructure costs are as follows:

C10.6.13.4.1. Salaries. Include the estimated percent of civilian personnel costs devoted to managing the IMET and MET programs. This should initially include all civilian personnel costs at the beginning of the year, which may be subsequently reimbursed by RDFP, FMS or other programs. As funding for training is confirmed to come from funding sources other than IMET, the infrastructure salary requirement is reduced and reimbursed by the other funding source. Civilian personnel costs directly related to a course or MET training program are charged directly to the country receiving the training and are not included in the infrastructure costs.

C10.6.13.4.2. Travel and Per Diem. Include the travel costs to attend meetings directed by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) such as annual SCETWG, and the IMET End of Year Review. Infrastructure travel costs do not include the cost of site surveys or other trips related to a course or MET training program, which are charged directly to the course.

C10.6.13.4.3. Equipment, Supplies, Books, and Miscellaneous. Include costs for materials used by personnel providing infrastructure support. It does not include items specific to a particular MET training program or course, which are included in course costs. The miscellaneous expenses include office-related cell phone bills and faxes and are subject to oversight.

C10.6.13.4.4. General Administration and Facilities. Include hosts organizations’ costs for providing and managing the facility. This is usually calculated as a percentage of staff and or space used. Include costs associated with providing the following support: procurement, comptroller, legal, Information Technology (IT), library, building maintenance, and utilities. The costs will be incrementally incurred to support the IMET school programs.

C10.6.13.5. Funding Request. Requests for General Cost Funds are periodically submitted to the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) for approval. Requests for Infrastructure Funds are submitted annually to the DSCA (OBO) for approval. Infrastructure fund requests must identify the funding categories listed above.

C10.6.13.6. International Military Education and Training Offsetting Collections. Requests for General Cost Funds are periodically submitted to the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (OBO) for approval. Requests for Infrastructure Funds are submitted annually to the DSCA (OBO) for approval. Infrastructure fund requests must identify the funding categories listed above.

C10.6.14. Extraordinary Expenses. Extraordinary expenses are used to finance costs of the Commandant’s welcome, receptions, banquets for civilian and military sponsors, class or seminar dine-ins, faculty-student luncheons, graduations, and similar activities that offer a cultural experience and enhance the relationship between school officials, local community supporting participants, and the international students. These are budget project N60 expenses incidental to representational activities for students under the IMET program and are limited by FAA, section 636(g) (22 U.S.C. 2396(g)) and related appropriation acts. N60 funds may be used only for IMET-funded students. However, joint activities with non-IMET funded students are often cost effective. In those cases, IMET N60, including Field Studies Program (FSP) events funded with IMET, costs are pro-rated on the basis of the respective numbers of IMET and FMS or non-IMET funded students. N60 funds may also be used in connection with FSP orientation tours.

C10.6.15. International Military Education and Training Funds Availability.

C10.6.15.1. Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. The Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (SFOAA) includes a recurring provision stating that funds appropriated for the purposes of chapter 5 of part II of the FAA which includes the authority for IMET under section 541 of the Act, "shall remain available for an additional four years from the date on which the availability of such funds would otherwise have expired, if such funds are initially obligated before the expiration of their respective periods of availability contained in this Act." IMET funds are apportioned directly to the DoD for implementation, consistent with past practice. Therefore, so long as DoD obligates the funds during their initial period of availability, the funds remain legally available for an additional four years. Although this additional period of availability is legally available, it is the responsibility of State to re-program funds as consistent with this legal authority.

C10.6.15.1.1. Although this provision has consistently been included in previous annual appropriations acts, future State appropriations acts may not include such an authority. Therefore, DSCA (Office of Business Operations, Comptroller Directorate, Security Assistance Division (OBO/CMP/SA)) will provide confirmation on an annual basis that such a provision is included in recently enacted SFOAAs.

C10.6.16. Invitation-Only Professional Military Education. Each of the Services, as well as the Joint Staff (JS) establish the priorities for inviting foreign students to attend the select Senior and Intermediate level PME courses identified in Table C10.T7. The internal processes used by the MILDEPS and National Defense University (NDU) will consider Service priorities, the CCMDs requirements as well as the countries of emphasis identified within the annual PME Submission Memorandum from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), when they establish their allocation priorities and identify the countries that will receive invitations to provide a candidate to attend their courses. The CJCS Instruction 1800.01F, Officer Professional Military Education Policy, provides additional guidance to the CCMDs to shape their prioritized inputs.

C10.6.16.1. CCMDs, in coordination with the appropriate MILDEP Component Commands, must provide country prioritizations with full justification to the appropriate MILDEP point of contact, by November 16 of each year for the academic year (AY) that begins two years later, (e.g., by November 16, 2018 for AY 2020-2021). For NDU, the CCMDs should provide country prioritizations are provided to the Senior Director for Security Assistance International Student Education Programs. During the Feb-Mar timeframe, the JS will lead an annual review board with the Services, DSCA and Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) participation to ensure that then proposed invites are aligned to the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and the National Military Strategy (NMS).

C10.6.16.2. In order to facilitate student selection/programming processes, the Services and NDU should finalize their lists of countries that will receive invitations no later than June 1 of each year for the AY that begins the following summer (e.g. by June 1, 2019 for AY 2020-2021).

Table C10.T7. Invitational Schools

Invitational Schools/Courses

C10.7.1. Foreign Military Financing-Funded Training. If the case is Foreign Military Financing (FMF)-funded, training must be by U.S. suppliers unless an offshore procurement waiver is granted.

C10.7.2. Contractor-Provided Training Under Foreign Military Sales. Training conducted by contractors, either at DoD-contracted or USG facilities, must be conducted under the same procedures and regulations (e.g., Invitational Travel Orders (ITOs) and vetting of International Military Students (IMSs)) outlined for government-provided training.

C10.7.3. International Military Students Eligibility Requirements for Funding Under the Foreign Military Sales Case System.

C10.7.3.1. Military. Military members from the recipient country’s defense establishment may receive Foreign Military Sales (FMS) training.

C10.7.3.2. Civilian Students. All Civilians must meet the course requirements, including those for security clearances. Civilians are generally afforded the same protocol status as their equivalent military counterparts, as stated in the ITO. See Section C10.8.1. for IMS Selection/Screening Requirements.

C10.7.3.2.1. Civilians: Ministry of Defense Employees. All civilian personnel may receive FMS (partner nation funded) training if they are Ministry of Defense (MoD) employees of eligible purchasers or employees under contract to the MoD in support of an FMS program and approved by The Department of State (State). A third party transfer waiver may be required to be approved by State.

C10.7.3.2.2. Civilians: Non- Ministry of Defense Employees. If appropriate under the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), section 607(a) (22 U.S.C. 2357(a)), international civilians who are not MoD employees of eligible FMS countries, or who are employees of eligible non-military international organizations (e.g., North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the United Nations (UN)) may receive training. See Section C4.5.7. “Certain Training” that may not be purchased using the FMS Program, and Section C5.1.5.2. “Letters of Request for Foreign Military Sales to non-Ministry of Defense Units” for additional information.

C10.7.4. Location of Training for Foreign Military Sales Case Students. Students may be trained at DoD schools, contractor facilities in the continental United States (CONUS), or outside of the continental United States (OCONUS), or civilian education institutions (on an exception basis). Training at civilian education institutions should be on a Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) basis between the civilian institution and the purchasing country vice through the FMS process. Requests for exceptions to this policy should be addressed to the DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) International military personnel receiving training negotiated directly between the purchasing country and vendor through DCS may not use U.S. military facilities to support the training.

C10.7.5. Travel and Living Allowance, Medical Care Requirements, and Other Student Support Costs for Foreign Military Sales Case Students. The purchaser is responsible for all student support costs while they are in training. Student support costs in FMS cases include transportation, and Travel and Living Allowances (TLA) (e.g., meals, lodging, custodial fees for quarters, and medical care). The purchaser must ensure that students receive sufficient allowances (30 days) for advanced start up housing costs and personal expenses in CONUS. Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs) should be aware of the status of living allowance provisions for their host nation’s students. Leased housing and rental vehicle costs may not be included on an FMS case. See Section C10.13.2. “Travel and Living Allowance on Foreign Military Sales/Foreign Military Financing Cases” for additional information. Contact DSCA (Office of Business Operations, Comptroller Directorate (OBO/CMP)) for updated guidance regarding execution of TLA carry-over under Cross Fiscal Year (CFY)/Full Operational Capability (FOC) for Section 333 programs.

C10.7.6. Baggage Limitations. A baggage limitation is not established for students receiving training under an FMS case as student travel is usually funded outside the FMS case. If a country has requested and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) has approved student travel under the FMS case, student baggage allowances are limited to the baggage authorizations for USG funded students.

C10.7.7. Privileges for Foreign Military Sales Case Students. International students and authorized dependents on ITOs are extended Commissary, Exchange, and similar privileges ordinarily available to U.S. military personnel of similar rank when approved by the Implementing Agency (IA). Equivalent rank assigned in the ITO must be based on the U.S. grade structure rather than rank title of the foreign country.

C10.7.8. The IA will ensure there is a separate training line included on every case that involves training, including materiel-only cases where the cost of the training is embedded in the materiel contract. Minimal-dollar value training lines for Building Partner Capacity (BPC) or FMS cases are authorized for the purpose of student accounting in Defense Security Assistance Management System - Training Module (DSAMS-TM) for Congressional reporting purposes. The IA will create the necessary training track(s) associated with the training line on the case in DSAMS, to include regional programs and contractor-provided training that occurs at contractor facilities. For a regional BPC program, each country participating in the training requires its own training line on the case.

C10.8.1. General. Every International Military Student (IMS) invited to participate in DoD training, regardless of sponsoring program, funding source, or security classification of the training, must satisfactorily complete the required security, medical, and other screening described in this section before a U.S. visa or Invitational Travel Order (ITO) will be issued to the IMS. Specific screening may include Security (see Section C10.8.3.), Human Rights (Leahy vetting) (see Section C10.8.4.), and Medical Fitness (see Section C10.8.5.). In most cases, if an IMS does not meet applicable screening requirements, that person will not be authorized to participate in DoD training or education and an ITO will not be issued. Some universally applicable screening factors include:

  • Age. The minimum age of an IMS who may participate in security cooperation (SC) training is 18 unless waived by standard exception (e.g., for Service Academies).
  • Course Prerequisites. Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs) must ensure IMSs meet course prerequisites noted in the Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) for all scheduled training.
  • English Language Requirements. SCOs must conduct English Comprehension Level (ECL) screening and testing for all non-exempt IMSs. Identifying qualified candidates who do not require extensive additional English Language Training (ELT) significantly reduces training costs while increasing partner nation ability to quickly respond to training opportunities or personnel substitutions. The SCO should review any in-country ELT programs to determine and advise about how language labs are used. See Section C10.10.3. for specific ECL requirements and waiver information.

C10.8.2. Data Collection Requirements for All Department of Defense-Provided Training and Education.

C10.8.2.1. When an IMS is nominated for U.S. sponsored training, the SCO first checks the Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS) to determine if that IMS has a previously assigned valid Student Control Number (SCN). If the IMS has a valid SCN, the SCO must program the IMS under that SCN; if not, the SCO will program the IMS under a new SCN assigned automatically by SC-TMS.

C10.8.2.2. The SCO enters in SC-TMS all IMS information required for the programmed training. This is done for all IMSs who attend DoD-provided resident and non-resident training, both inside and outside the United States for courses that are distance learning only (i.e., online, with no travel required outside the IMS's home country), IMS biographical information is entered into SC-TMS even though an ITO is not issued.

C10.8.2.3. If an IMS who has been programmed against a training line (or Worksheet Control Number (WCN)) must be removed from that WCN for any reason prior to the start of training, and is replaced by a different IMS, the SCO must ensure all data associated with the original IMS is expunged from the WCN records in SC-TMS and elsewhere and is replaced with the new IMS data. If an IMS is removed for any reason after beginning training, and is replaced by a different IMS in the training pipeline, the SCO must work with the Implementing Agency (IA) to terminate the original WCN and to build a new SC-TMS student record associated with a new WCN.

C10.8.2.4. The purchaser or benefitting country must ensure that any IMS and family member medical, biographic, or biometric information required for the training and the training location is provided to the SCO in the time and format requested to allow review, processing, and approval by the appropriate U.S. agency.

C10.8.2.4.1. To ensure there will be sufficient time to complete screening before the start of training, the SCO should strongly encourage the purchaser or benefitting country to prompt the IMS to submit required information as soon as possible after it is requested by the SCO.

C10.8.2.4.2. If the required IMS or family member information is not provided in time to facilitate and complete appropriate reviews before the IMS is scheduled to start training, the responsible Military Department (MILDEP) or IA may cancel or reschedule the training. Penalty fees may be collected in accordance with the DoD Financial Management Regulations (DoD FMR), Volume 15, Chapter 7.

C10.8.3. Security Screening and Vetting. Regardless of sponsoring program, funding source, or security classification of the training, every IMS invited to participate in DoD training must satisfy prerequisite security screening or vetting requirements before a training-related ITO or U.S. visa will be issued, or before the IMS will be authorized to participate in overseas SC team-conducted training. This includes any local (in-country) security screening and the DoD security vetting required for U.S. based training. The goal of both local security screening and DoD security vetting is to prevent nominated personnel who have a history of objectionable, unethical, or criminal behavior from being authorized to attend U.S. sponsored training. DoD security vetting additionally determines a person's eligibility for credentialed recurring access (CRA) to DoD installations or facilities in the United States.

C10.8.3.1. Local Security Screening.

C10.8.3.1.1. Local security screening will be conducted for both U.S. based training and overseas SC training teams, as deemed appropriate by the responsible country team, in accordance with the process developed by the embassy team and approved by the Ambassador. Local security screening is conducted, in coordination with the SCO, by in-country USG personnel (e.g., U.S. embassy Regional Security Officer (RSO) or U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) personnel) who have access to local information sources and official databases that can be searched for evidence of drug trafficking, trafficking in persons, terrorist activity or support, corruption, criminal conduct, or other U.S.-designated illegal or objectionable activities.

C10.8.3.1.2. The SCO will not accept, for any U.S. sponsored training, any foreign person who does not meet established local security screening standards unless a waiver is approved in writing by the Ambassador or an appropriate Department of State (State) designee.

C10.8.3.1.3. During the annual Combined Education and Training Program Plan (CETPP) review, the SCO will update the CETPP narrative describing if and how the local security screening process is incorporated into the student selection process for IMSs, including those who participate in mobile team training. See Section C10.22.5.2. “Security Screening for Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams/Mobile Education Teams, and Mobile Training Teams” for additional security screening information.

C10.8.3.1.4. DoD security vetting conducted pursuant to Section C10.8.3.2. may be considered an acceptable alternative to local security screening by the embassy team responsible for local security screening.

C10.8.3.2. Department of Defense Security Vetting.

C10.8.3.2.1. DoD security vetting procedures satisfy the security vetting requirements established by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (OUSD(I&S)). DoD security vetting does not supersede or eliminate the requirements for human rights screening (Leahy Vetting) described in Section C10.8.4. or local security screening described in Section C10.8.3.1.; however, it can be used in lieu of local security screening if desired and approved by the embassy. The visa application process is a separate process overseen by State, but the embassy will not issue a training-related visa to an IMS or accompanying family member (AFM) until formally notified that DoD security vetting has been completed (see Section C10.8.3.2.7.7.).

C10.8.3.2.2. OUSD(I&S) requires DoD security vetting for unexempted IMSs and their AFMs (see Section C10.8.3.2.6. for exemptions) who require CRA (i.e., unescorted physical access) for courses that last longer than 14 calendar days at a DoD training or education installation or facility in the U.S. This requirement includes Service Academy cadets/midshipmen (full-time and semester exchange) and Senior Service College students including those attending the Inter-American Defense College (IADC). The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) will determine whether DoD security vetting is required for access to its installations.

C10.8.3.2.3. The installation-owning MILDEP may also require DoD security vetting for courses or classes scheduled to last 14 calendar days or less. Vetting requirements will be indicated in the applicable T-MASL.

C10.8.3.2.4. If DoD security vetting is required in order to obtain CRA for an IMS or family member who originally entered the U.S. for reasons that did not require DoD security vetting (e.g., to attend a civilian school or on a work permit), the responsible MILDEP or IA will work with the SCO to ensure compliance with all required DoD security vetting requirements.

C10.8.3.2.5. Department of Defense Security Vetting Components. Pre-ITO/visa issuance DoD security vetting consists of two main components: personal information and data collection, and consent agreements.

C10.8.3.2.5.1. As part of the security vetting process, biographic and biometric data are collected. Further, if a visa is required, a DS-160 online Nonimmigrant Visa Application form is submitted for each IMS and AFM. If a visa is not required, the needed data is collected using alternative forms (see Section C10.8.3.2.7.6.). Biometric enrollment required for DoD security vetting is separate from biometric enrollment conducted by embassy consular sections for visa applications.

C10.8.3.2.5.2. All IMSs and adult (a person 18 years old or older) AFMs who require CRA must sign one or more consent agreements (available on the Security Assistance Network Web (SANWeb)) acknowledging they were informed about, understand, and agree to comply with DoD security policies. An IMS who requires CRA must sign all three agreements listed below. An adult AFM who requires CRA must sign the Privately Owned Firearms (POF) and Publicly Available Electronic Information (PAEI) agreements (#2. and #3., below). The IMS is responsible for an accompanying minor's (a person under age 18) compliance with the POF agreement (#2. below).

  1. Conduct Expectations for IMS in the United States (Conduct Expectations Agreement)
  2. DoD Prohibition on the Transport, Possession, Storage, or Use of Privately Owned Firearms and Non-Official Ammunition in the United States (POF Agreement)
  3. Consent to Monitoring of Publicly Available Electronic Information (PAEI Agreement)

C10.8.3.2.5.3. Any IMS or AFM who refuses to provide all required biographic or biometric information, or who will not sign a required consent agreement, will not be granted CRA.

C10.8.3.2.6. Department of Defense Security Vetting Exemptions and Exceptions.

C10.8.3.2.6.1. DoD security vetting exemptions are not required for citizens of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom who have been granted a home-country security clearance that is reciprocally accepted by the United States for access to classified information. This exemption does not apply to an AFM of an exempt person unless the AFM is also a citizen of one of these countries and has also been granted a clearance that is reciprocally accepted by the United States.

C10.8.3.2.6.2. DoD security vetting is not required for any U.S. citizen, nor for an AFM who is a lawful permanent resident of the U.S.; however,

  1. The IMS must still satisfy local security screening requirements outlined in Section C10.8.3.1., as applicable.
  2. U.S. nationals, including dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the U.S., and do not require a U.S. visa. The IMS's foreign government is responsible for issuing foreign government passports and requesting U.S. visas for the IMS and AFMs. Typically, non-U.S. citizens travel to U.S. based training on an A-2 visa (see the State website for exceptions). All IMS passports and visas must be valid for the entire duration of the IMS training period.
  3. The SCO must enter IMS information and prepare an ITO for an IMS who is a U.S. citizen the same way as would be done for non-U.S. citizens, including how the IMS will meet healthcare coverage requirements.
  4. For USG Identification (ID) card issuance, the IMS (and any AFMs) must have two official forms of ID included on the DoD List of Acceptable Identity Documents, on which all names are ordered (e.g., Last, First, Middle) and spelled exactly the same.

C10.8.3.2.6.3. DoD security vetting is not required for foreign military personnel who:

  1. Only participate in military exercises on a DoD installation in the U.S.;
  2. Are escorted (continuously accompanied by a U.S. citizen who has CRA to the training installation) the entire time they are on a DoD installation or facility for training;
  3. Only attend contractor-provided training conducted entirely at contractor locations (not on a DoD installation or facility), under Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) or DoD contracts;
  4. Are present on a DoD installation or facility to serve as permanent cadre or whose participation in a DoD training activity is exclusively as a short-term guest trainer or instructor.

C10.8.3.2.6.4. DoD security vetting is not required for foreign nationals who are students at the six Senior Military Colleges (The Citadel, Norwich University, Texas A&M University, University of North Georgia, Virginia Military Institute, and Virginia Tech), nor for foreign nationals who are Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) members at other U.S. institutions.

C10.8.3.2.6.5. No person is exempt from DoD security vetting solely because of age (i.e., persons under 18).

C10.8.3.2.6.6. A person is not exempt from DoD security vetting solely because travel to the United States is done on a diplomatic passport.

C10.8.3.2.7. Department of Defense Security Vetting Data Collection and Reporting.

C10.8.3.2.7.1. Specific procedures used to collect DoD security vetting biographic and biometric data are published in locations appropriate to the sensitivity and security classification of the guidance.

C10.8.3.2.7.2. All required DoD security vetting data must be submitted no less than 35 days prior to the IMS report date at the first training location unless exempted per Section C10.8.3.2.7.5. If the required information is not provided in time to facilitate and complete appropriate reviews before the IMS is scheduled to start training, the responsible MILDEP or IA may cancel or reschedule the training, and penalty fees may be collected in accordance with the DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD FMR), Volume 15, Chapter 7. If a SCO foresees an exceptional situation that could result in delayed submission of required vetting information, the SCO must contact the geographic Combatant Command (CCMD) training manager to explore contingencies aimed at avoiding training cancellation.

C10.8.3.2.7.3. If an IMS or AFM does not provide required biographic or biometric information necessary for DoD vetting, or sign the consent agreements, CRA will not be granted to that person. If an IMS or AFM refuses to provide the required information or sign the consent agreements, the SCO will immediately report the refusal to the CCMD and the partner nation MoD point of contact (POC) to obtain guidance from both. If the IMS or AFM refusal will prevent an IMS from participating in the training, the responsible MILDEP or IA may cancel or reschedule the training, and penalty fees may be collected in accordance with the DoD FMR, Volume 15, Chapter 7.

C10.8.3.2.7.4. Because an IMS might be denied CRA based on a security vetting alert, the SCO should establish and maintain effective open channels of communication with the purchaser or benefitting country MoD, the responsible CCMD, and IA training managers. Insofar as possible, the SCO should work with those organizations to outline a process for substituting a different IMS on short notice, or for obtaining approval to send an IMS to the United States before security vetting is complete. In all cases, the SCO should notify the CCMD and the MILDEP or IA as soon as possible about anything that might prevent an IMS from beginning training on the programmed start date, including IMS reluctance to provide data or sign forms, partner nation passport issuance delays, or technology failures.

C10.8.3.2.7.5. On a case-by-case basis, OUSD(I&S) may approve an exception to pre-travel biometric enrollment for IMSs and AFMs from countries that send to the United States only a small number of IMSs per year. The SCO must first request through the CCMD to OUSD(I&S) that biometric data be collected at the first training installation in the U.S. instead of prior to travel-approval is not assured. Until the required biometric data is collected, CRA will not be granted. To ensure the MILDEP and the school are able to provide an appropriate escort for the IMS before CRA is granted, the SCO must obtain written concurrence for this request from the CCMD and the MILDEP that manages the first training location prior to submitting the formal request for biometric collection in the U.S. through the CCMD to OUSD(I&S).

C10.8.3.2.7.6. If an IMS or AFM who is subject to DoD security vetting does not need to complete a DS-160 Nonimmigrant Visa Application for any reason, the SCO will use the applicable biographic data template provided in SC-TMS to collect any information required for security vetting that would have been submitted in the DS-160.

C10.8.3.2.7.7. The embassy will only issue an IMS or AFM visa after the responsible DoD representative at the embassy (e.g., the SCO or SDO/DATT) formally notifies the consular section that DoD security vetting has been completed. The notification of completion of DoD security vetting to the embassy will be on DoD letterhead or sent as an official e-mail (from a .mil or state.gov account) and will include the forms and other documents submitted by the SCO in conjunction with the IMS or AFM official visa application. See DSCA's security vetting implementation guidance on SC-TMS for required content of such notifications.

C10.8.3.2.7.8. If an IMS or AFM in the United States need to renew a visa or other official travel document, the IMS must inform the SCO, who will notify the local U.S. embassy visa office and, as needed, seek guidance to share with the IMS to facilitate visa or other document renewal. The SCO will also work with the International Military Student Office (IMSO) or IA training manager to assist the IMS and to ensure new visa numbers or other document changes are updated in all pertinent IMS or AFM records, including SC-TMS.

C10.8.3.2.7.9. Locally employed staff may help an IMS complete a form and may enter biographic data into SC-TMS, but only U.S. citizens employed by the USG or as USG contractors may conduct DoD biometric enrollment.

C10.8.3.2.8. Responsibilities Related to Department of Defense Security Vetting.

C10.8.3.2.8.1. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) conducts IMS and AFM security screening, provides screening results on CRA fitness, and, as appropriate, provides information to the MILDEPs that is used for adjudication and CRA fitness determination. MILDEPs make CRA fitness determination decisions and report their determinations to DSCA and DCSA. MILDEPs also provide updated information to DCSA in support of continuous assessment requirements.

C10.8.3.2.8.2. DSCA operates and maintains SC-TMS and works with the SC training community to aide and facilitate DoD security vetting data reporting and record management. See Section C10.4.2. for more information about SC-TMS.

C10.8.3.2.8.3. The course-owning MILDEP, in coordination with the training installation or facility owner, will determine or validate if a course does not require an IMS to have CRA, and will ensure the T-MASL is updated to indicate that requirement. If a course is updated to indicate that CRA is not required, the MILDEP will inform DSCA so it can adjust the 'No CRA-Required' list (available on the SANWeb). To facilitate security vetting compliance, all DoD courses assigned a T-MASL are presumed to require CRA if they are not on the DSCA 'No CRA-Required' list.

C10.8.3.2.8.4. The purchaser or benefitting country ensures all required IMS and family member biographic and biometric information is provided to the SCO within the time requested to allow review, processing, and approval by the appropriate U.S. agency.

C10.8.3.2.8.5. Unexempted IMS and adult family members provide required biographic information and biometric data within the time requested to allow review, processing, and approval by the appropriate U.S. agency; this includes submission of completed DS-160 online Nonimmigrant Visa Applications, if required, and the required signed consent agreements.

C10.8.3.2.8.6. The SCO works with the purchaser or benefitting country to facilitate DoD security vetting compliance and explains the requirement, purpose, and process as needed. The SCO:

  • Provides or helps the IMS obtain required biographic data forms;
  • Collects and enters IMS and family member biographic data in SC-TMS, and coordinates or performs in-country biometric data collection and submission;
  • Confirms the IMS and AFMs have completed and submitted a DS-160 Nonimmigrant Visa Application, if required;
  • Ensures all data is entered and all completed forms are uploaded;
  • Issues an ITO only after confirming IMS and AFM have approved vetting results, or that results have been reviewed and accepted by the MILDEP;
  • Explains the consent agreements to the IMS and, if appropriate and possible, provides copies of the agreements that have been translated (and verified as accurate) into the IMS's primary language;
  • Explains the IMS will be required to participate in MILDEP-provided Insider Threat training during in-processing at the first training location;
  • Explains that any non-official travel that is not reflected in the ITO must be reported in advance to the IMSO if the travel is international (including Mexico, Canada, or any Caribbean country), or beyond a 250-mile radius of the school;
  • Briefs the IMS and AFMs about their responsibilities while in the U.S., and the potential consequences of not adhering to the signed agreements.

C10.8.3.2.8.7. International Military Student Office.

C10.8.3.2.8.7.1. Ensures the IMS attends MILDEP-provided Insider Threat training during in- processing (not later than the end of the first week) at the first training location.

C10.8.3.2.8.7.2. Ensures the IMS understands advance notice is required for any IMS personal travel that is not reflected in the ITO if the travel is international (including to Mexico, Canada, or any Caribbean country), or beyond a 250-mile radius of the school. Explains that all such travel will be recorded in SC-TMS by the IMSO, regardless of whether the travel is reported by the IMS or another source (though a reasonable attempt will first be made to verify the accuracy of other source's report). Records all IMS travel described in this paragraph in SC-TMS.

C10.8.3.2.8.7.3. Ensures any issues with or changes to IMS or AFM passports, visas, or other official documents of record are reported immediately to the IA training manager and the SCO so that IMS or AFM data records in SC-TMS can be updated.

C10.8.3.2.8.7.4. Coordinates biometric collection for individuals who receive an exception under Section C10.8.3.2.7.5.

C10.8.3.2.9. Department of Defense Security Vetting Data Privacy Management. All IMS and family member data collected by DoD in support of security vetting requirements will be collected, stored, shared, and disposed of in accordance with all applicable U.S. privacy laws and regulations. Only the data required to complete DoD security vetting will be requested, and the provided data will be retained by the USG no longer than deemed necessary or as directed by applicable policy. See the DoD Privacy Protection Statement posted in SC-TMS for details.

C10.8.4. Human Rights Screening (Leahy Vetting). Individual foreign security force members and/or whole foreign units and their commanders must be screened (Leahy Vetted) for evidence of gross violations of human rights and human trafficking violations if they are nominated for any U.S.-funded resident, non- resident, or SC team training. The SCO must initiate individual or unit Leahy vetting far enough in advance of the programmed training date to ensure completion before training starts, including State's vetting lead-time policy.

C10.8.4.1. Leahy vetting is not required for an IMS whose training is funded with partner nation funds.

C10.8.4.2. An IMS who is a U.S. Citizen (or holds dual citizenship with another country) is not required to be Leahy vetted, per State policy.

C10.8.4.3. The SCO should consult both the embassy's Leahy vetting guidance, and the State/DoD Leahy vetting requirements that are available on the SANweb home page on the 'Training -> IMS Screening and Vetting Guidance' tab.

C10.8.4.4. Embassy personnel normally use the State International Vetting and Security Tracking System (INVEST) to vet foreign security forces slated for DoD-funded training, equipment, or other assistance. The SCO should become familiar with embassy policies and procedures for accessing and using INVEST.

C10.8.5. Student Medical Examination Screening. Pre-departure and pre-training medical examinations are required to ensure an IMS meets the health and fitness standards of requested training, and to ensure an IMS and AFMs do not enter the United States while infected with a dangerous communicable disease, such as Tuberculosis, Ebola, Hepatitis, or a Coronavirus. An ITO will not be issued unless a physical exam for the IMS and every AFM is completed no more than three months prior to each person's arrival in the United States If an IMS is found after arrival to have a health or fitness problem that precludes participation in the training, and the problem cannot be mitigated before training starts, the IMS will be denied course entry and rescheduled for another course, or disenrolled and sent home.

C10.8.5.1. Training Location-Based Medical Screening Requirements.

C10.8.5.1.1. If U.S. sponsored training will take place in the United States, all medical screening requirements in this chapter apply.

C10.8.5.1.2. If an IMS enters the United States for other than training and is subsequently invited to participate in U.S. sponsored training in the United States (and is issued an ITO), all IMS medical screening requirements in this chapter apply, including completion of DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) and DD Form 2807-1 (Report of Medical History). AFM medical screening requirements in this chapter will apply to all dependents not in the United States who will become AFMs, but only immunization and pregnancy screening is required for AFMs already in the United States on a valid visa.

C10.8.5.1.3. If U.S. sponsored training will take place at a U.S. military or USG-owned facility outside the United States, medical screening requirements are the same as for training conducted in the United States, and all IMS and AFM medical screening requirements in this chapter apply, including completion of DD Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1.

C10.8.5.1.4. If U.S. sponsored training will take place at a non-USG facility in the IMS home country or in a third country, DoD and U.S. entry-related medical screening is not required. Nonetheless, an IMS must still meet all health and fitness standards specified for the training and may be denied enrollment or disenrolled for failure to do so.

C10.8.5.1.5. In all cases when U.S. sponsored training will take place in a third country, the IMS and AFMs must satisfy the health insurance coverage and medical entry requirements of that country. The SCO should contact the training location SCO or U.S. embassy to determine the third country healthcare insurance coverage and medical screening requirements.

C10.8.5.1.6. Before processing an IMS for any course in any country, the SCO should verify the IMS home country has not imposed restrictions that could prevent or delay a timely and safe return after training is complete. If the home country has imposed restrictions that could delay or prevent a return home, the SCO must seek appropriate MILDEP or CCMD concurrence prior to issuing an ITO.

C10.8.5.2. Medical Screening Requirements for All International Military Students.

C10.8.5.2.1. Defense Department (DD) Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1. Unless the IMS home country is eligible for Medical Fast Track (see Section C10.8.5.5.), all IMS medical examinations, vaccinations, and health problems or issues will be recorded in English on DD Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1. The SCO will provide the needed forms and, if needed, help the IMS with instructions for completing them.

C10.8.5.2.2. The IMS or partner nation home government is responsible for all costs of establishing IMS medical eligibility for travel to participate in DoD training, including examination, testing, or vaccination. If IMS training is funded by a DoD grant assistance program (e.g., IMET or FMF), any costs related to pre-travel examinations or treatment will not be funded by the grant assistance program.

C10.8.5.2.3. Certification of Immunization and Fitness. Either a partner nation MoD physician or a licensed practicing medical authority named on the U.S. embassy-maintained list of qualified practitioners must complete and sign DD Form 2808, block 82, certifying the IMS’s current immunization status, to include immunizations listed in Table C10.T8. and meets the health and fitness standards of requested training.

C10.8.5.2.3.1. Only a qualified medical professional can determine which of the required immunizations listed in Table C10.T8. are medically appropriate for the IMS, based on age, medical history, and current medical condition.

Table C10.T8. Required Immunizations List

Required Immunizations List

  • Measles, Mumps, and Rubella
  • Polio
  • Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, and acellular pertussis (if indicated Td/Tdap)
  • Varicella (chickenpox)
  • Yellow fever (if traveling from or thru an infected area)
  • Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B
  • All others mandated by DoD based on then-current public health concerns.

C10.8.5.2.3.2. After all medical screening is complete and the IMS has been determined fit to enter the United States and free of a "communicable disease of public health significance" (as discussed on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) website), a note will be placed by the reviewing physician in DD Form 2808, block 73, that states, "[full name of person examined] is currently free of a communicable disease of public health significance." See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures.

C10.8.5.2.4. Serological test for Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

C10.8.5.2.4.1. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) test results will be included on DD Form 2808, block 49.

C10.8.5.2.4.2. HIV is not designated by the United States as a communicable disease of public health significance, so HIV infection does not make a person inadmissible to the United States. Even so, if an IMS is identified as being HIV-positive, an HIV waiver request must be submitted to the MILDEP and approved prior to that person's travel to the United States. See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures.

C10.8.5.2.4.3. For some training, a waiver might not be granted, depending on the extent of HIV infection and if other related conditions have developed, e.g., Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The physical exam and laboratory results must be attached to the waiver request. The MILDEP will coordinate a waiver decision response with its medical office and with the training base or facility where the training is to take place.

C10.8.5.2.4.4. If an IMS travels to the United States for training, then leaves and returns for training within 12 months of the most recent negative HIV test, a new HIV test is not required unless the IMS exhibits symptoms of HIV or a clinical exam finds or indicates the possibility of HIV. A new HIV test is required if an IMS leaves and returns to the United States for training more than 12 months after the most recent negative HIV test.

C10.8.5.2.5. Screening for Tuberculosis.

C10.8.5.2.5.1. Every IMS who attends resident training at any DoD facility must be screened by means of a Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), an approved Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), or a chest x-ray to determine if there is presence of Tuberculosis (TB). The test results will be listed in DD Form 2808, block 73.

C10.8.5.2.5.2. A TB diagnosis of Class A (meaning the disease is clinically active and communicable) makes a person inadmissible to the United States under current U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and DoD policy guidelines.

C10.8.5.2.5.3. If the IMS is screened using the TST or IGRA, and the result is positive, the IMS must then have a chest x-ray to confirm the presence of active TB. If the TST or IGRA test result is negative for TB, a chest x-ray is not needed unless the IMS will be attending training that specifically requires a chest x-ray.

C10.8.5.2.5.4. If an IMS travels to the United States for training, then leaves and returns for training within 12 months of the most recent negative TB test, a new TB screening is not required unless the IMS has travelled to or through an area with a high-incidence/high-risk of TB, or exhibits symptoms of TB, or a clinical exam finds or indicates the possibility of active TB. A new TB screening is required if a person leaves and returns to the United States for training more than 12 months after the most recent negative TB test.

C10.8.5.2.6. Pregnancy Test. All female IMSs must submit results of a pregnancy test taken between two and four weeks prior to issuance of an ITO, and the test results will be listed in DD Form 2808, block 73. If the IMS is pregnant, the SCO must submit a health policy waiver request. See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures. See Section C10.9.7. for information about Pregnancy-Related Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage. Participants in DoD Regional Center (RC) programs are not required to have a pregnancy test as a condition of attendance.

C10.8.5.2.7. Dental Examination. All IMSs must have a complete dental examination prior to issuance of an ITO, and a partner nation MoD dentist or licensed practicing medical authority identified on the U.S. embassy-maintained list of qualified practitioners must complete and sign DD Form 2808, block 82, certifying the IMS does not require care for cavities, infection, or oral disease. The SCO must review the IMS's dental report to ensure it supports immediate entry into training. Participants in RC programs are not required to have a dental examination or certification as a condition of attendance.

C10.8.5.3. Training-Specific Medical Screening Requirements. In addition to the medical screening requirements in Section C10.8.5.2., every IMS who attends training that has specific health and fitness prerequisites will complete all required physical examinations and medical screening in the home country. As a general policy, an IMS must meet the specified prerequisites before travelling to the United States; however, if a required exam cannot be completed in the home country, the IMS might be allowed to travel to the United States but will not be enrolled in the course until all medical prerequisites are met.

C10.8.5.3.1. If a course has special medical screening requirements (e.g., for flying or diving), the T-MASL must specify the special health and fitness prerequisites and must state that the IMS must continue to meet the health and fitness standards for the duration of the training. The MILDEP must update the T-MASL as often as needed to ensure requirements are valid.

C10.8.5.3.2. If a required physical examination cannot be completed in the home country, or if the United States does not accept medical records from the IMS home country, or if the examination must be conducted by a U.S. military or civilian physician, the SCO will state in the ITO remarks section that the physical examination will be conducted at the first training installation at the home country's expense. The SCO will also obtain and provide information about where health screening bills are to be sent for payment. The only exceptions to billing the home country are for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries, or pursuant to other memoranda of agreement that waive this requirement.

C10.8.5.3.3. The MILDEP may authorize a specialized physical (e.g., a flight physical) to substitute for a general medical exam only if the specialized physical includes all of the requirements outlined in Section C10.8.5.2. and is completed not more three months prior to arrival in the United States.

C10.8.5.3.4. If a person travels to the United States for training more than once in a 12-month period or must return to the United States multiple times a year for the same training (e.g., pilot simulator training), the SCO should coordinate with the IA to determine if the qualifying physical can be used to satisfy recurring medical requirements until either it expires or IMS health or fitness changes. ITOs will be annotated to reflect authorization to use previous physicals for new training activity. The annotation will include name and office of the approver, date of approval, and any limitations.

C10.8.5.3.5. IMSs who are medically screened and declared fit for training in accordance with this section (see Section C10.8.5.) are exempt from additional medical examinations and immunoassay urinalysis and blood screening programs prior to the start of training except as follows: when the medical exam is an established prerequisite for admission to training that involves exceptional physical activity or safety factors (e.g., flight or diving); when the required testing capability does not exist in the home country (e.g., centrifuge); or in conjunction with sick call or hospitalization to diagnose an IMS medical condition.

C10.8.5.3.6. If an IMS is found after arrival to have a health or fitness problem that precludes participation in the training, and the problem cannot be mitigated before training starts, the IMS will be denied course entry and rescheduled for another course, or disenrolled and sent home.

C10.8.5.4. Accompanying Family Member Medical Screening Requirements. Dependents who will travel to the United States as AFMs must undergo and complete all required medical screening before they can be added to an ITO, as described below:

C10.8.5.4.1. The IMS or partner nation home government is responsible for all costs of establishing AFM medical eligibility for travel, including examination, testing, or vaccination.

C10.8.5.4.2. All AFM medical examinations, vaccinations, and health problems or issues will be recorded in English on DD Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1. The SCO will provide the needed forms and, if needed, help the IMS with instructions for completing them.

C10.8.5.4.3. Certification of Immunization and Fitness. Either a partner nation MoD physician or a licensed practicing medical authority named on the U.S. embassy-maintained list of qualified practitioners must complete and sign DD Form 2808, block 82 certifying the AFM’s current immunization status, to include immunizations listed in Table C10.T8.

C10.8.5.4.4. Only a qualified medical professional can determine which of the required immunizations listed in Table C10.T8. are medically appropriate for the AFM, based on age, medical history, and current medical condition. Only the MILDEP may approve a waiver for an AFM whose immunizations are not current.

C10.8.5.4.5. After all medical screening is complete and the AFM has been determined fit to enter the United States and free of a "communicable disease of public health significance" (as discussed on the USCIS website), a note will be placed by the SCO in DD Form 2808, block 73, that states, "[full name of person examined] is currently free of a communicable disease of public health significance." See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures.

C10.8.5.4.6. Serological test for Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

C10.8.5.4.6.1. Adult AFMs will be tested for HIV, and the test results will be included on DD Form 2808, block 49.

C10.8.5.4.6.2. HIV testing is not required for an AFM who is less than 15 years old unless the AFM exhibits symptoms of HIV; or a clinical exam finds or indicates the possibility HIV infection; or the person is believed to have been exposed to HIV.

C10.8.5.4.6.3. HIV is not designated by the United States as a communicable disease of public health significance, so HIV infection does not make a person inadmissible to the United States. Even so, if an AFM is identified as being HIV-positive, an HIV waiver request must be submitted to the MILDEP and approved prior to that person's travel to the United States. See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures.

C10.8.5.4.7. Screening for Tuberculosis.

C10.8.5.4.7.1. Every Adult AFM must be screened by means of a TST, an approved IGRA, or a chest x-ray to determine if there is presence of TB. The test results will be listed in DD Form 2808, block 73.

C10.8.5.4.7.2. TB testing is not required for an AFM who is less than 15 years old unless the AFM exhibits symptoms of TB; or a clinical exam finds or indicates the possibility TB infection; or the person is believed to have been exposed to TB.

C10.8.5.4.7.3. A TB diagnosis of Class A (meaning the disease is clinically active and communicable) makes a person inadmissible to the United States under current CDC and DoD policy guidelines.

C10.8.5.4.7.4. If the AFM is screened using the TST or IGRA, and the result is positive, the AFM must then have a chest x-ray to confirm the presence of active TB.

C10.8.5.4.7.5. If an AFM travels to the United States then leaves and returns within 12 months of the most recent negative TB test, a new TB screening is not required unless the AFM has travelled to or through an area with a high-incidence/high-risk of TB, or exhibits symptoms of TB, or a clinical exam finds or indicates the possibility of active TB. A new TB screening is required if the AFM leaves and returns to the United States for more than 12 months after the most recent negative TB test.

C10.8.5.4.8. Pregnancy Test. All female AFMs over the age of 18 must submit results of a pregnancy test taken between two and four weeks prior to issuance of an ITO. If an AFM is pregnant, the SCO must submit a request for a health policy waiver. See Section C10.8.5.7. for health policy waiver procedures. See Section C10.9.7. for information about Pregnancy-Related Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage.

C10.8.5.5. Medical Fast Track. Medical Fast Track relieves an IMS or RC activity participant of the necessity to undergo redundant medical testing and certification by allowing U.S. acceptance of alternate medical examination certification and history. Table C10.T9. lists countries approved for Medical Fast Track.

C10.8.5.5.1. Medical Fast Track is applicable only to personnel from an approved country who do not have a medical condition that requires maintenance medication or routine follow-up treatment or appointments during training (e.g., high blood pressure, diabetes, a cardiac condition, or allergies).

C10.8.5.5.2. Medical Fast Track waivers do not apply to examinations for, or vaccinations against, USG-designated significant health threats (e.g. COVID-19, SARS, Ebola).

C10.8.5.5.3. Medical Fast Track does not apply to AFM medical screening, does not relieve the country of the requirement to comply with all medical screening requirements, and does not relieve the country or IMS of responsibility for providing healthcare coverage or insurance for the IMS and AFMs.

C10.8.5.5.4. A person from a Fast Track country may submit the home country medical examination and medical history forms (in English) to the SCO in lieu of DD Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1.; however, MILDEPs must ensure the T-MASL indicates if DD Form 2808 and DD Form 2807-1. are still required in addition to the provided documents. If they are required, the SCO will work with the IMS to complete the forms and ensure they are ready when the IMS departs for training.

C10.8.5.5.5. The SCO is not required to review medical exams for personnel or from Fast Track countries; however, the SCO must provide certification in accordance with Section C10.8.5.2.3.2. by placing a note in the ITO that the person is from a Fast Track country, has been medically screened by an acceptable authority, is currently free of a communicable disease of public health significance, and meets the health and fitness requirements of the scheduled training activity.

C10.8.5.5.6. The Fast Track person must obtain and either forward or hand-deliver official copies of medical exams, medical history, and relevant test results to the medical treatment facility identified by the IMSO at the training location. Medical test results and records must be in English or be accompanied by an official English translation.

C10.8.5.5.7. A female IMS from a Fast Track country must submit results of a pregnancy test taken between two and four weeks prior to issuance of an ITO. If the IMS is pregnant, the SCO must submit a health policy waiver request. See Section C10.8.5.6. for health policy waiver procedures. See Section C10.9.7. for information about Pregnancy-Related Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage. Participants in RC programs are not required to have a pregnancy test as a condition of attendance.

C10.8.5.5.8. If an IMS from a Fast Track country is found after arrival to have a health or fitness problem that precludes participation in the training, and should have been identified during the screening process, DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) will re-evaluate the country's Fast Track eligibility status.

C10.8.5.5.9. DSCA will review the Fast Track country list annually, in consultation with the CCMDs and the MILDEPs, to determine if countries should be removed or added. Current Fast Track countries are listed in Table C10.T9.

Table C10.T9. Fast Track Countries

EUCOM

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom

CENTCOM

Lebanon

NORTHCOM

Canada

INDOPACOM

Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Taiwan

SOUTHCOM

Argentina, Barbados, and Chile

C10.8.5.6. Health Policy Waivers for International Military Students and Accompanying Family Members.

C10.8.5.6.1. A health policy waiver is used to suspend or mitigate a U.S. imposed limitation or restriction that would prevent a person from travelling to the United States or participating in U.S. sponsored training. Health policy waiver requests are typically submitted by the SCO through the CCMD to the appropriate MILDEP. The MILDEP POC coordinates health policy waiver requests with appropriate medical, training field activity, and school personnel. All health policy waiver requests are to be tracked, reported, and cited by the MILDEP as appropriate and required to ensure a consistent application of criteria to similar requests. A health policy waiver may only be granted based on criteria established by the MILDEP.

C10.8.5.6.2. IMS health policy waiver requests should include the ITO number and the schedule of training, dates, and locations. AFM health policy waiver requests should include both identifying IMS information and information about the IMS-dependent relationship. All health policy waiver requests will include copies of pertinent laboratory results and medical professional reports.

C10.8.5.6.3. Health policy waiver requests for individuals who test positive for communicable diseases that are not included in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (e.g., Hepatitis-A, -B, and -C) will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the USCIS pursuant to Title 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(g) under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Section 212(g)(1) for "Inadmissibility Due to a Communicable Disease of Public Health Significance." The waiver will be requested by the SCO, who will complete and submit USCIS Form I-601.

C10.8.5.6.4. Health policy waiver requests will not be approved for either a pregnant IMS or AFM under any program unless the IMS has documented and verified medical insurance or partner nation indemnification that covers all prenatal, childbirth, and postnatal care costs, in accordance with Section C10.9.6.3.

C10.8.5.6.5. All approved health policy waiver requests must be noted on the ITO.

C10.8.5.7. Privacy Matters.

C10.8.5.7.1. An individual's health information privacy will be maintained. Only people who need to know IMS or AFM medical information for official reasons are to have access to it.

C10.8.5.7.2. When health-related statistical or historical information reporting is required by policy or regulation, only a person's home country, WCN, and program type (e.g., IMET or FMS) will be used.

C10.8.5.7.3. Insofar as is practical, health policy waiver requests and other communications that contain IMS or AFM personal information should be sent via encrypted e-mail or handled the same way U.S. personnel Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Protected Health Information (PHI) is handled.

C10.8.5.7.4. IMS medical records are to be treated the same as U.S. Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). SCOs should not require an IMS travelling to a U.S. school to complete a DD Form 2870, Authorization for Disclosure of Medical or Dental Information. When requesting health policy waivers, the SCO does not have to obtain a release of health information from the IMS.

C10.8.5.7.5. SCOs and IMSOs will not permanently keep IMS or dependent health or medical information, nor store such with IMS permanent training records. Physical copies of IMS and dependent medical records must be returned to the IMS or destroyed within 15 days after the IMS returns from training; digital copies of such records are to be permanently deleted in accordance with DoD files management policy. This requirement will be noted in the CETPP, Appendix A, Paragraph 4a.

C10.8.5.8. Medical Screening Responsibilities.

C10.8.5.8.1. Country Team Responsibilities.

C10.8.5.8.1.1. Ensure required IMS medical and dental screening is completed in accordance with Section C10.8.5.2. and Section C10.8.5.3. Only accept required IMS exam results, records, and reports through official channels (i.e., from the home country MoD or a certified medical authority), not directly from the IMS.

C10.8.5.8.1.2. Ensure required AFM health screening is completed in accordance with Section C10.8.5.

C10.8.5.8.2. Security Cooperation Organization Responsibilities.

C10.8.5.8.2.1. In coordination with the Embassy team, annually obtain or request from the partner nation MoD an updated list of licensed medical practitioners authorized to sign off on required medical forms.

C10.8.5.8.2.2. Review healthcare medical insurance policy coverage options to ensure compliance with DSCA policy, and review and coordinate available options with the home country and the IMS. Ensure healthcare coverage is verified by the MILDEP prior to issuance of an ITO or addition of AFM to the IMS ITO.

C10.8.5.8.2.3. Prior to issuing the ITO, obtain and thoroughly examine for completeness the medical and dental certification, DD Form 2808, DD Form 2807-1, and all required test results. If the examining physician or dentist identify a health condition that may require maintenance medication or routine follow-up treatment or appointments during training (e.g., high blood pressure, diabetes, a cardiac condition, or allergies), annotate in ITO item 15 that the IMS "has a health condition that may require maintenance medication or routine follow-up treatment." Submit and obtain approvals for applicable health waiver requests as needed. To protect IMS privacy, do not specify medical conditions on the ITO, only annotate that the IMS has a maintenance medical condition.

C10.8.5.8.2.4. If required, coordinate Fast Track requirements and procedures with the training location host nation, including identification of medical certification documentation that will be required (e.g., certification from host government, a letter from a physician, or copies of the home country test results).

C10.8.5.8.2.5. Assemble a copy of all required IMS and AFM medical documentation (with English translations) and an English version of required healthcare insurance policy documents, and place in a sealed packet. Advise the IMS to hand-carry the sealed packet for delivery to a U.S. health care provider, as directed by the IMSO. Give the IMS a second sealed copy of the English version of the medical insurance policy documents to give to the IMSO.

C10.8.5.8.2.6. Explain to the IMS the responsibilities listed in Section C10.8.5.8.3. and ensure the IMS knows who to contact (and how) if there is a medical emergency en route to training.

C10.8.5.8.3. International Military Student Responsibilities.

C10.8.5.8.3.1. Notify the IMSO immediately about any IMS or AFM medical problem or issue that arises while in the United States, including pregnancy.

C10.8.5.8.3.2. Become familiar with medical policies, procedures, and requirements explained or identified as important by the SCO; and seek guidance and assistance from the IMSO or local medical treatment facility (MTF) regarding any health-related issues or concerns.

C10.8.5.8.3.3. If instructed to do so by the IMSO, deliver the sealed packet of medical documents to the designated MTF; otherwise, keep all medical documentation in the sealed packed. If medical treatment is required and the MTF will not retain a medical file or documents, obtain the documents and keep with the original medical documents. Regardless of what an MTF does with medical records, in all cases, maintain a personal copy of health information while in the United States to use in case of medical treatment or emergencies.

C10.8.5.8.4. International Military Student Office Responsibilities.

C10.8.5.8.4.1. Review the ITO for compliance with healthcare coverage and medical screening requirements, including TB and HIV test results. Immediately notify the MILDEP and SCO about any discrepancies.

C10.8.5.8.4.2. Review with the IMS the responsibilities listed in Section C10.8.5.8.3.; brief the IMS and AFMs about medical facilities and healthcare options available in the area; and ensure the IMS knows who to contact (and how) in a medical emergency.

C10.8.5.8.4.3. If appropriate, verify the IMS has delivered the sealed packet containing medical documentation to an MTF; otherwise, tell the IMS to store the sealed packet in a safe place until needed.

C10.8.5.8.4.4. While preparing IMS and AFM return travel, immediately notify the MILDEP about anything that could delay or prevent the timely and safe return to the home country, including public health travel restrictions, political travel restrictions, or catastrophic natural events (e.g., hurricanes, volcanos, or earthquakes.)

C10.8.5.9. Regional Centers.

C10.8.5.9.1. Medical Fast Track procedures will be applied to all countries for purposes of RC program participant processing. Participants traveling to an RC program or event in the United States with an ITO or a letter of invitation issued by the SCO or the RC will adhere to fast track procedures described in Section C10.8.5.5.

C10.8.5.9.2. Participants traveling to an RC program or event in the United States with an ITO or a letter of invitation issued by the SCO, or the RC must meet State medical screening entry requirements as determined by the Consular Office in the U.S. Embassy. If approved by the RC Director, foreign military personnel who are assigned as foreign liaison officers (FLOs) or Exchange Officers with DoD and are stationed within the local commuting area of a U.S. based RC, may attend RC events on a space-available basis without needing additional medical vetting.

C10.8.5.9.3. Participants traveling to an RC program or event in a third country are responsible for satisfying all healthcare insurance coverage requirements of the country where the RC event is being held. The host RC will notify event participants about host country healthcare coverage requirements. For example, non-German participants must meet German entry requirements to attend an RC event at the Marshall Center. The participant's SCO should contact the training location SCO, the host RC, or the appropriate RC to determine specific healthcare insurance coverage requirements in the event nation.

C10.8.5.9.4. Participants traveling to an RC program or event do not require a dental exam or pregnancy test unless required by the host country.

All healthcare services provided to an International Military Student (IMS) or authorized dependent while attending training in the continental United States (CONUS) or outside of the continental United States (OCONUS), whether at a military treatment facility or at a civilian medical facility incur a cost that must be paid by either the IMS, the foreign country, or the USG. To ensure that healthcare is available when needed, before an International Travel Order (ITO) is issued, a viable means to satisfy potential healthcare costs incurred by the IMS undergoing DoD provided training and any authorized dependents (regardless of citizenship), while in the United States must be identified. This section outlines the avenues for establishing how healthcare costs will be satisfied for the IMS and/or their authorized dependents. An IMS’s country’s failure to pay the USG or a U.S. healthcare provider for health care services received by the IMS and their authorized dependents may result in the IMS being returned home, or the authorized dependent being removed from the ITO, loss of DoD privileges/access, and a DoD recommendation for Department of State (State) revocation of an authorized dependent’s visa. Non-payment for health care services received by the IMS and their authorized dependents will jeopardize future country allocations for DoD provided training programs.

NOTE: DoD does not support either an IMS or non-U.S. citizen dependents applying for non-emergency U.S. Federal, State, or other U.S. taxpayer subsidized medical/dental programs. (See Section C10.9.8.5.6.1.) If the IMS has authorized dependent children that are U.S. citizens, those dependents may be permitted to participate in U.S Taxpayer-subsidized medical and dental programs, but they still require appropriate healthcare insurance coverage.

C10.9.1. Healthcare Coverage While in the United States. IMSs who are not participating in a USG funded program and authorized dependents for all IMSs are required to have foreign government provided healthcare coverage while in the United States. A foreign government must establish healthcare coverage by electing whether to:

  1. provide an indemnification letter;
  2. arrange for payment of potential healthcare costs though a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case; or
  3. provide proof of a commercial insurance policy.

The foreign government’s requirement to elect one of the three described options to establish healthcare coverage does not apply to an IMS participating in a USG funded program. For an IMS participating in a USG funded program, the USG funded program will pay for emergency or non/elective medical or dental healthcare coverage for the IMS. Regardless of the existence or non-existence of foreign government provided healthcare coverage, every IMS remains financially responsible in their individual capacity for any of their unpaid healthcare bills, including co-payments, deductibles, and services provided.

C10.9.1.1. Foreign Government Indemnification for Medical Coverage and Direct Payment to the Service Providers for Healthcare Costs Incurred by the International Military Student and/or his/her Authorized Dependents.

C10.9.1.1.1. If a foreign country selects to provide an indemnification letter, the Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) will note on the ITO that the country agrees to remit reimbursement of accrued bills for healthcare (medical and dental care) costs for the IMS and all authorized dependents. The SCO will add the name and address of the CONUS based, partner nation official responsible for reimbursing the providers of medical costs for the IMS and all authorized dependents during their stay in the United States. A foreign country indemnification letter may indicate a foreign government intent to self-fund all healthcare costs and/or satisfy such costs by means of a foreign government procured health insurance plan. If health care costs will be covered by a country funded group health insurance plan, the SCO will also note the CONUS based point of contact (POC) and U.S. address and contact information for payment. A foreign government group health insurance plan need not meet the individual coverage requirements outlined in Section C10.9.5. “Minimum Requirements.” If dependents are included on the signed letter of indemnification, they can be only added to the ITO if they are authorized by the USG and meet the screening requirements of Section C10.12.

C10.9.1.1.2. Healthcare bills are sent directly to an IMS’s government entity with a U.S. address for payment. Bills should be paid within 90 days after the bill is sent. Arrangements that require the IMS to pay for medical services and then seek reimbursement from his/her government are prohibited unless DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) has granted a waiver. See Section C10.9.8.5.3., for the waiver process to establish a modified medical coverage arrangement. The approved waiver will be kept on file by the SCO and annotated on the ITO where indicated. The waiver will be valid unless there is a failure to pay bills within 90 days.

C10.9.1.2. Training Case Line Item for Medical Coverage.

C10.9.1.2.1. Direct Payment by Foreign Government via a National Funds Foreign Military Sales Case. An FMS training case funded with national funds may be used to pay the costs of a commercial healthcare policy to provide for medical and dental coverage for the IMS and authorized dependents. A foreign government group health insurance plan need not meet the individual coverage requirements outlined in Section C10.9.5. “Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage” if it meets the criteria outlines in Section C10.9.1.1.1. If a country wishes to include payment of pre-existing conditions like pregnancy, childbirth costs, or other medical condition(s) requiring maintenance medication(s) and routine follow-up appointments during training (e.g., low or high blood pressure, diabetes, cardiac condition, allergies), and/or non-emergency dental care or other elective procedures for an IMS and/or authorized dependents with this line, the details must be included in the case and noted on the ITO. The IMS and/or authorized dependents must be indemnified by the IMS’s government for any pre-existing condition, including pregnancy coverage, special needs requirements, prescription coverage, and dialysis. See Section C10.9.6. “Pregnancy Coverage” for additional information. See Section C10.9.8.9. “Medical Care for Foreign Military Sales Case Students.”

C10.9.1.2.2. A Foreign Government may elect to use a National Funds FMS Case to pay for the cost of a commercial health insurance policy. However, the cost of procuring supplemental insurance is not treated as a cost of the training or the course itself.

C10.9.1.3. Grant Program Funding for International Military Student Medical Care.

C10.9.1.3.1. Some USG Title 22 funded programs (e.g. International Military Education and Training (IMET) and Foreign Military Financing (FMF)), and Title 10 funded grant programs (e.g. Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP) and Section 333 programs), may pay for emergency or non/elective medical or dental healthcare costs for the IMS only. Medically necessary or non/elective medical or dental healthcare coverage is further defined as only providing the medically necessary treatment required to safely return the IMS to training or back to their country. The grant programs will provide emergency medical coverage when CONUS based students are traveling temporary duty (TDY) to other countries as a requirement of their course of instruction.

C10.9.1.3.1.1. The grant program will authorize a cost factor to be assessed per IMS training line for the payment of IMS medical care received from military and civilian healthcare facilities. For example, the IMET factor of $35 per IMS training line is authorized for programming purposes under generic code N7E (Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) B365003, D365003, and P365003)). Grant program funds collected from each IMS training line at the Service level will be used to pay medical costs incurred by that countries IMET funded IMS. A separate country or IMS funded medical insurance policy or country indemnification will be required to pay for medical and dental care of all authorized dependents of IMS attending grant program funded training.

C10.9.1.3.1.2. Other U.S. Grant funded Title 22 programs (e.g., FMF) may use an approved medical line on a case to provide emergency or non/elective medical or dental healthcare coverage for IMS only. FMF may not be used to cover authorized dependent medical care. See Section C10.9.8.9.1. Those programs that do not provide complete healthcare coverage for the requirements outlined in Section C10.9.5. “Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage” require either a separate FMS (partner nation funded) case for medical expenses, a letter of indemnification, or commercial insurance policy.

C10.9.1.3.1.3. For Title 10 funded Building Partner Capacity (BPC) cases, (e.g., Section 333), the Implementing Agency (IA) may add a separate line to the proposal or Memorandum of Request (MOR)/Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) to cover emergency or non/elective medical or dental healthcare coverage for the IMS. If funds on the case are insufficient to cover unforeseen medical expenses, the case may be amended, and BPC program funds may be added to the case.

C10.9.1.3.2. Grant funded programs will NOT cover treatment of an IMS or authorized dependent for a pre-existing condition, including pregnancy. Despite the lack of an indemnification letter from the foreign government, the IMS’s government will still be expected to pay for all medical costs to treat an IMS and/or authorized dependents for any pre-existing condition, including, pregnancy coverage, high blood pressure and dialysis. The foreign government’s responsibility for the cost of all medical care for pre-existing conditions and pregnancy must be noted on the ITO. See Section C10.9.6. “Pregnancy Coverage” for additional information. An IMS’s country’s failure to indemnify pay the USG or a U.S. healthcare provider for health care services received by the IMS and their authorized dependents may result in the IMS being returned home, or the authorized dependent being removed from the ITO, loss of DoD privileges/access, and a DoD recommendation for State revocation of authorized dependent’s visa. Non-payment for health care services received by the IMS and their authorized dependents will jeopardize future country allocations for DoD provided training programs.

C10.9.1.3.3. All authorized dependents of an IMS attending grant funded training require a separate country or IMS funded supplemental medical insurance policy to pay any costs for medical and dental care unless payment is specifically guaranteed in writing by the foreign government. The IMS must contact the International Military Student Office (IMSO) to ensure that dependent coverage covers expenses to meet the local school enrollment requirements, such as school physicals, immunization/vaccination, any special care required for pre-existing physical, cognitive or learning disabilities as well as pregnancy pre and postnatal care. Authorized dependents and their eligibility for benefits and privileges are defined in the Joint Security Cooperation Education and Training Regulation (JSCET), Paragraph 10-9b(12), Dependents and in DoD Manual (DoDM) 1000.13, Volume 2, Enclosure 15, and specific screening requirements are outlined in Section C10.8.5.3.

C10.9.1.4. North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Partnership for Peace Status of Forces Agreements and Reciprocal Health Care Agreements for Medical Coverage. The details and scope of existing North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)/Partnership for Peace (PfP) Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA) and Reciprocal Health Care Agreements (RHCA) type agreements as well as those yet to be established vary, both in who is actually covered, for how long, and what coverage is provided. SCOs should contact their geographic Combatant Command (CCMD) training POC to determine the status of any NATO/PfP SOFA and RHCA and to identify any limits in coverage.

C10.9.1.4.1. To ensure full coverage, the IMSs who are not participating in a USG funded program and all authorized dependents from nations with either a NATO/PfP SOFA and RHCA require supplemental commercial healthcare insurance or indemnification by their government for medical services not covered under the NATO/PfP SOFA and RHCA. See Section C10.9.3. “Healthcare Provisions for International Military Students Covered Under a North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Partnership for Peace International Military Student Status of Forces Agreement” and Section C10.9.4. “Healthcare Provisions for International Military Students and Their Dependents Covered Under a Reciprocal Healthcare Agreement” for additional information.

C10.9.1.4.2. See Section C10.9.2. for information regarding healthcare costs incurred in a DoD Medical Treatment Facility (MTF). See Section C10.9.7.2.3. for information regarding required annotations to the ITO if IMS or Authorized dependents are covered by a NATO/PfP SOFA or RHCA.

C10.9.1.5. Medical Care for International Military Education and Training Students. See Section C10.9.1.3. for information regarding medical coverage requirements for IMET and other Title 10 and Title 22 grant funded programs.

C10.9.1.6. Commercial Healthcare Insurance Policies Procured by the International Military Student for Medical Coverage. All healthcare insurance policies must meet the individual coverage requirements outlined in Section C10.9.5. “Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage.”

C10.9.2. Healthcare Costs Incurred in a Medical Treatment Facility.

C10.9.2.1. Healthcare Costs Incurred in a Department of Defense Medical Treatment Facility. All healthcare services provided to an IMS or authorized dependent at a DoD MTF facility while attending training in CONUS or OCONUS, generate a bill that must be paid via one of the processes identified in Section C10.9.1. The healthcare costs are considered to be a personal debt of the IMS to the USG. The healthcare notation on the IMS’s ITO states who is financially responsible for paying the healthcare costs. The SCO, in coordination with the Military Department (MILDEP), must work with the partner nation to collect any unpaid debt. SCOs should contact their Embassy to determine the status of any agreement between the USG and the foreign partner that may address coverage of DoD provided health care. (See Section C10.9.1.4.).

C10.9.2.2. Healthcare Costs Incurred in a Civilian Medical Treatment Facility.

C10.9.2.2.1. When a specific medical or dental treatment is not available at a DoD MTF, the IMS and/or authorized dependents must obtain a referral from the appropriate DoD MTF for the medical or dental treatment to be received in a civilian medical or dental facility, (with the exception of an emergency or non-availability of the DoD MTF, such as weekend closure.)

C10.9.2.2.2. Civilian healthcare providers/treatment facilities typically will require the patient to show how costs for healthcare will be paid prior to treatment. Properly prepared ITOs fulfill this requirement. When the ITO indicates commercial healthcare insurance is required, the IMS/dependent will need to show to the servicing medical treatment facility his/her insurance card with a U.S. based POC and phone number. The IMS/Dependent may be required to pay a co-pay and deductible if not yet met.

C10.9.2.2.3. The DoD does not support the IMS and non-U.S. citizen dependents participating in non-emergency U.S. Federal, State, or other U.S. taxpayer-subsidized medical/dental programs (See Section C10.9.8.5.6.1.).

C10.9.3. Healthcare Provisions for International Military Students Covered Under a North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Partnership for Peace International Military Student Status of Forces Agreement. The following healthcare provisions pertain:

C10.9.3.1. Healthcare at a Department of Defense Medical Treatment Facility.

C10.9.3.1.1. Outpatient care (medical and emergency dental) provided by a DoD MTF is at no charge to the IMS and authorized dependents (some treatments are available for only the IMS and not for authorized dependents).

C10.9.3.1.2. Inpatient care for both the IMS and dependents (if available) is on a reimbursable basis. Supplemental healthcare coverage is required for the IMS and authorized dependents if not covered by the program or case, or if payment is not guaranteed in writing by the foreign government.

C10.9.3.2. Healthcare at a Civilian Medical Treatment Facility.

C10.9.3.2.1. Inpatient care for both the IMS and dependents is on a reimbursable basis. The IMS and/or dependents are required to have supplemental medical insurance coverage if not covered by the program or case, or if payment is not guaranteed in writing by the foreign government.

C10.9.3.2.2. If referred by a DoD MTF, IMS outpatient care (medical and emergency dental) at a civilian MTF is covered by TRICARE Select which is a healthcare program of the U.S. DoD Military Health System; however, a co-pay is required, as well as a deductible if not yet met. SCOs should contact their Embassy to determine the status of any agreement and to identify any limits in coverage. Additional TRICARE Select info for NATO/PfP IMSs can be found at: https://tricare.mil/foreignforces.

C10.9.3.2.3. If referred by a DoD MTF, civilian outpatient care for authorized dependents covered under a NATO/PfP SOFA may be covered by TRICARE Select which will require the IMS or dependent to pay a co-pay and deductible if not yet met. Refer to the specific details of the agreement to identify any limits in coverage. Additional TRICARE Select info for NATO/PfP IMSs can be found at: https://tricare.mil/foreignforces.

C10.9.3.2.4. Inpatient care for both the IMS and authorized dependents at a Civilian MTF is on a reimbursable basis and is not covered thru NATO/PfP SOFA. The IMS and/or authorized dependents are required to have supplemental medical insurance coverage which may also require the individual pay the co-pay and any deductible amount, if not yet met (NOTE - this is not familiar to most foreigners).

C10.9.4. Healthcare Provisions for International Military Students and Their Dependents Covered Under a Reciprocal Healthcare Agreement.

C10.9.4.1. Healthcare at a Department of Defense Medical Treatment Facility.

C10.9.4.1.1. RHCAs differ by country in coverage and do not provide full healthcare coverage. Article III of the RHCA describes the scope and specifically identifies who is covered - the IMS is not covered unless specifically identified within Article III. Additionally, although dependents of IMET funded IMSs are usually identified as being covered under the RHCA, unless specifically identified, the RHCA does not extend to dependents of students funded by other programs. It is critical that the RHCA be carefully reviewed by the SCO to determine if it is current or will expire during the IMS’s expected stay. SCOs should review the language of any existing RHCA per instruction in Section C10.9.4.4., as well as the language defining dependents in DoDM 1000.13, Volume 2, Enclosure 15, and contact their Embassy or geographic CCMD Training Manager to determine the status of any updates to the agreement and any limits in coverage.

C10.9.4.2. RHCAs are applicable only for providing medical and dental care (for authorized dependents only), in DoD medical and dental facilities at no cost; if a training installation does not have a DoD MTF, the terms of the agreement do not apply. Many military installations do not have a full service MTF, or the nearest MTF is located a considerable distance from the schoolhouse/training activity. RHCAs do not cover civilian provided healthcare for either the IMS or Dependents of the IMS, including care while traveling away from their assigned military installation.

C10.9.4.3. All authorized dependents of an IMS that rely on an RHCA or as their primary source of insurance coverage must secure the supplemental healthcare insurance needed to meet the requirements specified in Section C10.9.5.

C10.9.4.4. For verification and information on RHCA, please access the Defense Security Cooperation University (DSCU) International Training Management web page at https://www.dscu.edu/itm. To find a specific RHCA, go the menu on the left side of the page to the following link: Functional Areas/Health Affairs/RHCA.

C10.9.5. Healthcare Insurance Policy Coverage.

C10.9.5.1. The healthcare coverage should include for all non-elective medical conditions for the IMS and authorized dependents and must be in effect for one year or the duration of the IMS and dependents’ stay in the United States under DoD sponsorship (including leave period indicated in the ITO) and maintained until their return to the home country. If the IMS permits his healthcare policy to lapse, is unable to meet these financial obligations and the home country government has not agreed to indemnify the costs, the IMS may be withdrawn from training and returned to home country.

C10.9.5.1.1. Failure by the IMS to maintain health care coverage for themselves or their dependents may result in the dependent(s) being removed from the ITO, loss of all other DoD privileges/access, and a recommendation for revocation of their dependents’ visa. Any lapse in IMS/Dependent healthcare coverage will jeopardize future grant funding and training allocations for the country.

C10.9.5.2. Minimum Requirements. Healthcare insurance policy coverage must meet the following requirements. Information concerning some healthcare insurance policies that meet the requirements of this policy can be found on the web at https://www.dscu.edu/itm under Functional Areas/Health Affairs.

C10.9.5.2.1. Healthcare insurance policy coverage must include coverage for all non-elective medical conditions. In addition to having healthcare coverage insurance, the IMS and/or authorized dependents must be indemnified by the IMS’s government for any known pre-existing condition, including pregnancy pre and postnatal care coverage and any special care required for pre-existing physical, cognitive or learning disabilities.

C10.9.5.2.2. Medical benefits of at least $400,000 per year, per individual/family member (payable in U.S. dollars; no conversion from foreign currency).

C10.9.5.2.3. Deductible not to exceed $1000 annually per family.

C10.9.5.2.4. Repatriation of remains in the amount of $50,000 (per individual/family member), should a death occur in the United States, to provide for the preparation and transportation of remains to home country.

C10.9.5.2.5. Medical evacuation in the amount of at least $250,000 (per individual/family member) for immediate transportation to the nearest adequate medical facility, and to return to their home country in the event it is subsequently determined to be medically necessary for the IMS, and/or authorized dependents to return to their home country.

C10.9.5.2.6. No exclusion for payment of benefits directly to a DoD MTF if applicable.

C10.9.5.2.7. Provide nationwide coverage/service; non-U.S. based policies must provide benefits in the United States.

C10.9.5.2.8. Provide single source administration/management for the policy.

C10.9.5.2.9. Have a point of contact in the United States. In all cases, the insurance provider must directly reimburse medical healthcare providers promptly in U.S. dollars and have a claims office with a U.S. address and U.S. phone number.

C10.9.5.2.10. Have a copy of the policy written in English.

C10.9.5.2.10.1. An English copy of the policy will be provided to the SCO, the servicing MTF, and the IMSO at all schoolhouses within the IMS’s training track (e.g., Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC)). The IMS will also retain a copy of the policy.

C10.9.5.2.10.2. Some MILDEP schools require the IMSO to review health insurance policies for compliance with the policy in this chapter prior to the issuance of the ITO to the IMS. The SCO will scan and send a copy (in English) of the proposed policy as directed by IMSO and/or MILDEPs.

C10.9.5.2.10.2.1. For students attending Maritime (U.S. Navy (USN)/U.S. Marine Corps (USMC)/U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)) and Army courses, submit policies for review through the Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS) based Commercial Healthcare Insurance Policy Review Upload Process.

C10.9.5.2.10.2.2. The SC-TMS upload process is identical across applicable Maritime (NAVY/USMC/USCG) and Army pipelines in order to provide standardization. The one exception is that Maritime and Army each have unique back-up email addresses to be used for review IF the SC-TMS upload process goes down.

C10.9.5.2.11. If the U.S. education and training event is taking place in a third country, medical coverage must meet the requirements of the third country/training nation. Contact the SCO, the DoD training provider, or the appropriate Regional Center to determine specific medical coverage requirements in the training nation.

C10.9.5.2.12. The minimum dollar standards and coverage requirements will be reviewed annually by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) to ensure that they reflect the current cost and coverage of U.S. healthcare.

C10.9.6. Pregnancy Coverage.

C10.9.6.1. Pregnancy insurance is in addition to requirements specified in Section C10.9.5. Pregnancy and childbirth coverage is not usually included in insurance policies purchased less than 12 months in advance, and is generally very expensive. Pregnancy insurance coverage is not available for purchase after an IMS or dependent is determined to be pregnant as it is considered a pre-existing condition.

C10.9.6.2. A pregnant IMS or a pregnant authorized dependent will require a health policy waiver before being authorized on an ITO.

C10.9.6.3. Pregnant dependents will not be authorized to accompany or join the IMS unless the costs of prenatal, childbirth, and postnatal care are covered by an FMS (national funds) case, or an already existing pregnancy insurance policy for at least $250,000 prior to their arrival, or if the country agrees to pay, in writing, for any incurred cost prior to the dependent’s arrival.

C10.9.6.4. An IMS or authorized dependent without pregnancy coverage, who is found to be pregnant after arrival in the United States will be returned to her home country immediately unless the IMS’s government guarantees within ten working days after notification to pay all costs associated for prenatal, childbirth and postnatal care. Failure to provide payment of associated bills by the country within 90 days after the bill is sent could affect the authorization for dependents to accompany students from that country in the future and may result in the student’s removal from training.

C10.9.7. International Travel Order Healthcare Notations.

C10.9.7.1. Required health screening and healthcare financial responsibility entries for the IMS and authorized dependents must be annotated appropriately and accurately on the ITO according to the status of the IMS. Authorized dependents will not be added to the ITO until all medical screening and healthcare coverage requirements have been verified by the SCO.

C10.9.7.2. For the IMS and authorized dependents, the SCO will check the appropriate block of the ITO to indicate how healthcare charges will be paid and ensure the ITO includes the name of a U.S. POC, billing address and telephone number.

C10.9.7.2.1. When commercial insurance is the means of healthcare coverage, the SCO will include the insurance company name, policy number, inclusive dates of the policy, and the U.S. POC (individual) name and contact information in block 12 of the ITO.

C10.9.7.2.2. If the foreign government or an FMS case is designated as the source of funding for the IMS and authorized dependent healthcare coverage, a statement will be included in the Remarks Section of the ITO that indicates whether or not all costs associated with pregnancy coverage are included in this coverage.

C10.9.7.2.3. If there is a valid RHCA or NATO/PfP SOFA, the SCO checks item 12b(3) on the ITO and adds the following statement to item 13, “Medical care in the DoD MTF is provided under [reference the agreement, date, etc.]. Reimbursement for provided services provided is not required.” See Section C10.9.4. for additional RHCA information.

C10.9.8. Healthcare Coverage Responsibilities.

C10.9.8.1. DSCA is the DoD designated authority for international security cooperation (SC) training and education programs. DSCA develops and promulgates policy and guidance and provides oversight for the implementation and execution of healthcare coverage policy to the MILDEPs, IMSOs CCMDs, and SCOs. DSCA reviews, coordinates with the MILDEPs, and approves requests for exceptions to the healthcare coverage policy.

C10.9.8.2. Combatant Command Responsibilities. Ensure that the SCO understands and adheres to the policies contained in this chapter.

C10.9.8.3. Military Department Responsibilities. When commercial healthcare coverage is required, establish procedures for the review of student healthcare policies to ensure compliance with the SAMM and any applicable MILDEP directives. If a MILDEP uses a contractor to review student healthcare coverage policies, the cost of the contract for medical review may be computed as part of the tuition rate. See the DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD FMR), Volume 15, Chapter 7, paragraph 071002.D. The cost developed will be the same per student regardless of the training rate, as the cost is an incremental cost. If the cost to review the medical healthcare coverage is not included in the IMSO duties, then a separate line will be included on the case and the country charged for the service.

C10.9.8.3.1. In coordination with the CCMD, enforce the following directives when notified by the IMSO of IMS non-compliance with this policy:

C10.9.8.3.1.1. When notified by the IMSO of an irresolvable lapse or lack of required commercial healthcare insurance for the IMS, coordinate with the IMS’s government to determine the payment mechanism for outstanding medical bills. If the IMS’s government does not agree to pay for required healthcare insurance or outstanding medical bills MILDEPs need to take action to withdraw the IMS from education and training and return the IMS to his/her home country.

C10.9.8.3.1.2. When notified by the IMSO of an irresolvable lapse of required commercial healthcare insurance for authorized dependents, the MILDEP will take the following action:

  • Direct the SCO to remove all non-compliant authorized dependents from the ITO.
  • Direct the IMSO to collect DoD issued Identification (ID) cards and request the IMS to return authorized dependents to home country.
  • If the IMS fails to send authorized dependents home within ten working days, direct the IMSO to withdraw the IMS from training and return the IMS to home country.

C10.9.8.4. Country Responsibilities. When applicable, provide to the SCO copies of signed, legal country-to-country agreements or other statements that stipulate payments and reimbursement methods of healthcare costs for the IMS and/or authorized dependents (e.g., RHCA, SOFAs).

C10.9.8.5. Security Cooperation Organization Responsibilities.

C10.9.8.5.1. Determine healthcare coverage requirements and payment method(s) applicable to IMS and authorized dependents (if any). If commercial healthcare coverage is required, scan and send an English language copy of the insurance policy along with the proposed ITO to the IMSO and any others specified by the MILDEP at least 30 days prior to report date for unaccompanied IMS and at least 60 days prior for accompanied students.

C10.9.8.5.2. Obtain concurrence from the MILDEP that coverage meets the requirements of this policy prior to signing the ITO. Special attention must be taken to ensure the IMS understands their responsibilities (if they have authorized dependents) to purchase coverage to augment support for any known physical, mental or learning disabilities, school enrollment physicals and any immunizations/vaccinations, and pregnancy pre and postnatal care.

C10.9.8.5.3. Submit a waiver request through the CCMD to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) for a modified medical coverage arrangement (e.g., country-provided healthcare coverage requires student to pay outpatient costs and seek reimbursement); or a country wishes to guarantee payment for medevac or repatriation expenses rather than including in the insurance. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) will coordinate approval of the waiver request with the MILDEPs. Once approved, the SCO request will include specific details of the proposed arrangement with the U.S. POCs and the U.S. billing addresses for the Nation and the IMS, with the date of DSCA approval, in the ITO. The approved waiver will be kept on file by the SCO and annotated on the ITO where indicated. The waiver may be voided if there is a failure to pay bills within 90 days.

C10.9.8.5.4. If applicable, ensure the IMS has a copy of his/her healthcare insurance policy (in English) for delivery to the IMSO upon arrival at his/her first education and training site.

C10.9.8.5.4.1. When the IMS or authorized dependents are covered by a RHCA or NATO/PfP SOFA, ensure ITO block 12 specifies either a supplemental commercial healthcare insurance policy or indemnification by their government for healthcare services not covered under the RHCA (See Section C10.9.4.) or NATO/PfP SOFA (See Section C10.9.3.).

C10.9.8.5.5. If applicable, include in block 15 of the ITO a notation of any existing special medical conditions/preconditions for both the IMS and/or dependents. Do not provide any details that may compromise the rights to privacy of the IMS or authorized dependents.

C10.9.8.5.6. If training will occur in a third country, ensure the IMS has met healthcare requirements of the host nation.

C10.9.8.5.6.1. Brief the IMS on the following:

  • Explain eligibility for healthcare in a DoD MTF.
  • When applicable, advise that failure to maintain required healthcare insurance policy coverage, to include pregnancy coverage, for the duration of his/her stay, could result in removal from education and training and return home.
  • Inform the IMS that while under sponsorship of DoD SC education and training programs, non-emergency participation on behalf of the IMS or non-U.S. citizen dependents, in a U.S. Federal, State, or other U.S. taxpayer-subsidized medical/dental programs is not permitted/supported by the DoD and may result in removal from education and training and return home.
  • Inform the IMS of the financial and ethical responsibilities regarding all aspects of this healthcare policy, and have the IMS acknowledge, in writing, an understanding of the policy concerning healthcare insurance coverage, including consequences of a lack of pregnancy coverage and policy against using non-emergency U.S. taxpayer provided medical/dental assistance under DoD sponsorship. Retain the statement until the IMS has returned to home country.

C10.9.8.6. International Military Student Responsibilities.

C10.9.8.6.1. Acknowledge, in writing, an understanding of the policy concerning healthcare insurance coverage, including consequences of the lack of pregnancy coverage and policy against applying for financial assistance, welfare benefits, a social security number, driver license or other, non-emergency U.S. tax-payer provided medical/dental assistance while under DoD sponsorship without approval from the Military Service.

C10.9.8.6.2. If applicable, present healthcare insurance policy (in English) to the IMSO and to medical treatment facilities.

C10.9.8.6.3. Notify the IMSO immediately of any and all medical care required or received by the IMS and/or dependents, including cases of pregnancy. It is not necessary to divulge private medical information if it does not affect successful completion of training, but it is necessary to let the IMSO know that a medical bill may be expected.

C10.9.8.7. International Military Student Officer Responsibilities.

C10.9.8.7.1. Review the International Travel Order for Accuracy. When commercial healthcare insurance policy is marked or stated in the remarks, a copy of the insurance policy, along with any updates to the policy, will be placed in the IMS file.

C10.9.8.7.2. If commercial healthcare insurance is required for the IMS and/or authorized dependents, as directed by the MILDEP, review the healthcare insurance policy for compliance with requirements in Section C10.9., prior to IMS authorization for travel. Provide the SCO with instructions on where to send the English version for review. Report any deficiencies in healthcare coverage immediately to the MILDEP Country Program Manager and SCO. If it is found that minimum coverage requirements have not been met, ID cards will not be issued to dependents.

C10.9.8.7.3. Advise the IMS of the requirement to take the ITO and healthcare insurance policy documentation to local medical treatment facilities and any physicians that provide them medical services during their stay in the United States.

C10.9.8.7.4. Brief the IMS on all procedures and requirements as outlined in this chapter, including requirements in cases of pregnancy. Obtain a signed memorandum of acknowledgement and understanding from the IMS.

C10.9.8.7.5. If unauthorized dependents arrive at the training activity location, contact the MILDEP training policy manager immediately for advice on restricting installation access and healthcare coverage.

C10.9.8.8. Department of Defense Regional Center’s Responsibilities.

C10.9.8.8.1. Ensure that participants traveling to a DoD Regional Center (RC) program or event (e.g., course, seminar, conference, and workshop) meet any and all healthcare coverage requirements imposed by the country where the RC event is being held.

C10.9.8.8.2. For each RC program or event that requires travel to the U.S., specific health coverage requirements will be identified as part of the Fast Track Program. See Section C10.8.5.5.1.

C10.9.8.8.3. Update the T-MASL and the nomination process to ensure the SCO is aware of the specific health coverage requirements for each RC program and event that requires travel to the United States, ensuring that the participants are appropriately screened.

C10.9.8.9. Medical Care for Foreign Military Sales Case Students. An FMS case may include host nation funds to cover medical care at DoD and commercial health care facilities for FMS students training under the case. Medical care for authorized accompanying dependents may also be included in the FMS case if specifically requested by the purchaser. An FMS case should not be used for the sole purpose of obtaining medical care for international students or their dependents unless approved in writing by the DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)), DSCA (DSCU/IMTE, and DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)) prior to LOA development.

C10.9.8.9.1. Cases funded by FMF may not be used to cover authorized dependent medical care.

C10.9.8.9.2. Each FMS IMS attending CONUS training (to include accompanying dependents authorized on the IMS’s ITO) must have health care coverage explicitly stated on the ITO. See Section C10.11., for additional info regarding ITO requirements. See Section C10.8.5., and Section C10.9., for requirements for medical screening and healthcare coverage.

C10.10.1. English Language Training. Training in U.S. military schools and installations is conducted in English, except for the U.S. Army’s Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC), the U.S. Air Force’s Inter-American Air Forces Academy (IAAFA), and most programs offered by the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School (NAVSCIATTS). International students must be able to understand, speak, read, and write English at a level of proficiency that enables them to successfully complete training.

C10.10.2. Responsibility for English Language Training. Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC), under the command of Air Force Air Education and Training Command (AETC), is responsible for operational and technical control of the Defense English Language Program (DELP). This program encompasses all DoD English language training (ELT) programs or courses conducted for U.S. personnel, as well as international students under the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), and DoD-funded security cooperation (SC) programs worldwide to prepare students for follow-on U.S. military training. Military Department (MILDEP) international education and training activities compile and submit English language training requirements for their respective service to the DoD Executive Agent for ELT, currently HAF A1/D.

C10.10.3. Minimum English Comprehension Level. The foreign country is responsible for ensuring that students meet the Implementing Agency (IA)-determined minimum English Comprehension Level (ECL) for attendance at a particular course of instruction. Most courses require a minimum ECL of 70. Higher level Professional Military Education (PME) and management courses, or courses that are hazardous, require an 80 or higher ECL.

C10.10.3.1. Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs) must test students from non-exempt countries for the minimum ECL prescribed by the IA for each course of instruction or for entry into DLIELC. Test materials to determine the ECL of selected candidates for U.S. training are provided annually by DLIELC, together with instructions for administering the test. SCOs must also schedule oral proficiency interviews (OPI) for students scheduled for flight and certain other training in accordance with DLIELC Instruction 1025.9. The minimum ECL and OPI requirements for each course are listed in the Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) which can be found in the Security Assistance Network Web (SANWeb) which can be accessed by authorized users. SCOs receive certification to administer ECL testing from DLIELC.

C10.10.3.2. Course Prerequisites. Students must meet prerequisites for all scheduled training. The prerequisites are usually included in the T-MASL.

C10.10.3.3. Minimum English Comprehension Level for Students Entering Defense Language Institute English Language Center. The minimum ECL score for entry into general ELT at DLIELC is 55, regardless of the training’s funding source. Training Assistance for ELT may be purchased under the FMS program, or by the training of instructors at DLIELC if permitted and authorized under the IMET or other USG-funded programs. Training assistance may also utilize English language Mobile Training Teams (MTTs) or Language Training Detachments (LTDs) or provide appropriate ELT materials and equipment. Details on DLIELC, MTTs, and LTDs are included in the DLIELC website at www.dlielc.edu.

C10.10.3.4. Exemptions from all English Comprehension Level Testing Requirements for Education and Training Purposes. Certain countries whose students have consistently demonstrated an English-speaking capability during training are exempt from all ECL testing requirements. This exemption does not apply to ECL testing requirements set for U.S.-sponsored exercises and competitions. An annual review by DLIELC, MILDEP training activities, and DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) determines if the exemption should continue. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE), in coordination with the DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)), confirms the exemption list each year and issues a memorandum to the training community. Students from exempt countries must continue to demonstrate successful English language performance during training or the exemption must be withdrawn.

C10.10.3.5. Exemptions from In-Country English Comprehension Level Testing for Direct Entry into Training. Certain countries whose students demonstrate an English-speaking capability are exempt from in-country ECL testing prior to direct entry into non-ELT training. Students from exempt countries are ECL tested at the first training installation. An annual review determines if the exemption should continue. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) confirms the exemption list each year by message. Students from exempt countries must continue to demonstrate successful English language performance during training or the exemption must be withdrawn.

C10.10.3.6. Waiver to Course Minimum English Comprehension Level Requirement to Attend Defense Language Institute English Language Center. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) in consultation with the DoD Executive Agent for ELT and DLIELC, and with the concurrence of the Combatant Command (CCMD), may grant a waiver to an ECL score of less than 55 for entry into general ELT at DLIELC when justified by unusual circumstances, regardless of funding source.

C10.10.3.6.1. Requests for waivers to minimum course ECL prerequisites for follow-on training (FOT) or Direct Entry Training are made by the SCO through the CCMD to the Military Service (See Joint Security Cooperation Education and Training Regulation (JSCET), section 5-9), in coordination with the training unit.

C10.10.3.6.2. ECL Waivers may be for individual IMSs or groups of IMSs supporting a particular country program. See Figure C10.F5., or go to the SANweb: Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS)/Forms for a fillable, DLIELC ECL Waiver Request template.

Figure C10.F5. English Comprehension Level Waiver

Figure C10.F5. English Comprehension Level Waiver

PDF Fillable form is available in SANweb/SC-TMS.

C10.10.3.7. Test of English as a Foreign Language. SCOs are authorized to program the cost of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) under IMET and Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP) when it is required for entrance into approved degree-granting military undergraduate or graduate training programs. IMET and RDFP do not fund the prospective students’ travel cost to the testing site.

C10.10.3.8. Specialized English Training. Attendance at a Specialized English Training (SET) is required when general ECL requirements have been met and the IA determines (based on schoolhouse recommendation) that exceptional fluency or specialized vocabularies are essential to safety or effective participation in the course of instruction. For Senior PME courses, “SET Required” is programmed by exception as needed. Students must meet the highest level of the required ECLs, and if applicable, the OPI requirement(s) for their FOT courses before they are entered into their SET portion of their courses, even if in specific cases the ECL and/or OPI requirement(s) have been waived by the FOT. If a waiver is desired to enter SET without the required ECL and OPI qualifications, a request must be submitted by the SCO or MILDEP to AF/A1DG with FOT concurrence.

C10.10.3.9. Conduct of English Language Training by Other than Defense Language Institute English Language Center. All IMET-funded ELT must be conducted by DLIELC. ELT which leads to follow-on U.S. military training must also be conducted by DLIELC unless justified and approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) including ELT resourced through partner nation funded FMS cases, and DoD-funded SC programs (worldwide).

C10.10.3.9.1. For FMS cases, ELT may be conducted via contracted training with DLIELC oversight and agreement between the IA, AF/A1D and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) LORs should be coordinated with the IA and DLIELC before submitting to DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) for approval. If approved, the requested training would apply to the scope of the proposed ELT program, potentially including SET. Any follow-on changes to the case to increase student load or extend the duration of the ELT program requires a revised request to be approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) All requests should include the information contained in Table C10.T10.

Table C10.T10. Information Required for a Decision on the Conduct of English Language Training by Other than the Defense Language Institute English Language Center

#

Decision Information and Rationale

1

Explain why other ELT arrangements are needed.

2

ELT information including location, description of training facilities, number of students, training objectives, duration of the ELT program, and estimated cost.

3

Written IA and AF/A1DG position on the proposed ELT exception.

4

Statement that DLIELC monitors the ELT to ensure that DLIELC technical standards are being met; and performs a DLIELC certification once a year.

5

Statement that funding is available for DLIELC to monitor and provide quality control of the proposed ELT, for FMS through the cases with an appropriate line item, or for other SC programs with a budgeted program line.

C10.10.3.9.2. The IA will ensure that any contractor providing ELT pursuant to any FMS case adheres to all DLIELC requirements concerning the curriculum quality, standards, and execution of the training. The IA will also establish procedures and standards within the contract for IMS administration.

C10.10.3.9.3. For all other ELT supporting DoD-funded SC programs, the IA will establish procedures to adhere to the DLIELC American Language Course Placement Test (ALCPT) and ECL testing procedures and ensure Contractor adherence to DLIELC testing procedures by including/referencing these procedures in the contract. The ALCPT testing procedures for contractors are found in the ALCPT Handbook at www.dlielc.edu, and ECL testing procedures are outlined in DLIELC Instruction 1025.15, ECL Test Guidelines.

C10.10.3.10. Direct Entry English Comprehension Level Failure Forfeiture Charge. The MILDEP may impose a forfeiture charge in all instances when direct entry students fail to achieve the prerequisite ECL on the continental United States (CONUS) course entry ECL test and when failure results in rescheduling or cancellation of direct entry training due to language deficiency. This policy applies to all direct entry students, including those from countries granted a waiver from the in-country ECL testing.

C10.10.3.11. English Language Training Materials. English Language Training Materials (ELTM), including textbooks, testing materials, training aids, interactive multimedia (Compact Discs (CDs)/Digital Video Discs (DVDs)), and publications used to establish and/or support in-country ELT programs may be acquired under the IMET program, other SC programs, or purchased through FMS procedures. A factor of 50 percent of the cost of the materials ordered is programmed for air shipping transportation costs. ELTM can be shipped by ground transportation if specified by the country.

C10.11.1. International Military Students (IMSs) participating in DoD provided training will travel to the United States or other training location on an International Travel Order (ITO), not on a Foreign Visit Request (FVR). The ITO is the controlling document provided to international students authorizing them to participate in DoD provided training. The ITO provides the dates and location the IMS is to receive training; the accounting fund cite that will be used to pay for the training; the guidance for determining what support the IMS is entitled to; and the privileges the IMS may be entitled to while receiving training. The ITO will only be provided to IMSs once they complete in-country security and medical screening.

C10.11.1.1. The Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) is responsible for the preparation, explanation, and issuance of an ITO for each individual IMS. Multiple IMSs may not be entered on a single ITO. The only ITO document authorized is the Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS) generated ITO. An example of an ITO is shown in Figure C10.F6. If the Service financial system is temporarily down and funded ITOs cannot be generated via SC-TMS, SCOs should contact the Implementing Agency (IA) for guidance.

Figure C10.F6. Example of Invitational Travel Order from the Security Cooperation Training Management System

C10.11.1.2. Foreign participants in joint or combined exercises, subject matter expert (SME) Exchanges, or other visits (with the exception of Orientation Tours/Distinguished Visitor Orientation Tours (OT/DVOT) which require both an FVR and an ITO, that do not explicitly involve instruction/training must travel on an FVR, not on an ITO.

C10.11.1.3. The SCO will annotate the required health screening and health care financial responsibility entries for the IMS and authorized dependents appropriately and accurately in paragraphs 11 and 12 on the ITO. For the IMS and authorized dependents who meet the requirements for either the regular screening or fast track, the SCO will ensure the ITO has the appropriate block checked that medical screening has been accomplished.

C10.11.1.4. When the IMS is covered by a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)/Partnership for Peace (PfP) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or their authorized dependents are covered under an Reciprocal Health Care Agreement (RHCA), ensure that the ITO block 12 specifies the name of a U.S. point of contact (POC), billing address and telephone number for the supplemental commercial healthcare insurance policy and/or indemnification by their government for healthcare services not covered under the NATO/PfP SOFA (See Section C10.9.3.) or RHCA (See Section C10.9.4.).

C10.11.1.5. If applicable, include in block 15 of the ITO a notation of any existing special medical conditions, cognitive or physical disabilities/preconditions for the IMS and/or any dependents. This information is required to ensure the appropriate care is available at the training location. Care should be taken to ensure confidentiality of any details that may compromise the rights to privacy of the IMS or authorized dependents.

C10.11.2. Student Documentation. ITOs and visas will only be issued to the IMS and authorized dependents after in-country IMS/dependent screening is completed. (See Section C10.8.3.). The IMS or authorized dependent name on the ITO will be the same as on the country-issued passport and visa. No changes can be made to the IMS’s name on the ITO or within SC-TMS until the name on the IMS’s passport and visa are changed.

C10.11.2.1. All IMSs are required to have a minimum of six (6) months remaining on their passport upon completion of programmed training. See the Department of State (State) website for additional passport and visa information: Visas for Diplomats and Foreign Government Officials. It is recommended that IMSs carry their passport and visa with them at all times while in the United States. Each IMS is responsible for his/her own travel documents. If there are any discrepancies, IMSs should contact his/her embassy to correct the problem immediately.

C10.11.2.1.1. The U.S. visa is the authority to travel to the United States during the valid period; it has no relation to the period of stay in the United States. Multiple entry visas should be considered if the IMS will be required/permitted to visit Mexico, Canada, or other countries during the period of training.

C10.11.2.1.2. The Form I-94 is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Arrival/Departure Record issued to the IMS. Rather than distributing a paper Form I-94, the IMS’s passport will be scanned generating an electronic arrival record. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will issue an automated Form I-94 to the IMS when they enter the United States their air or sea port of entry and place an admission stamp on their travel document (a paper version of Form I-94 may be obtained at https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/). This date, in conjunction with their ITO, forms the documentation that governs the IMS’s status in the United States.

C10.12.1. Definition. Authorized dependents and their eligibilities for benefits and privileges are defined in the Joint Security Cooperation Education and Training Regulation (JSCET), Paragraph 10-9b(12), Dependents, and in DoD Manual (DoDM) 1000.13, Volume 2, Enclosure 15.

C10.12.2. Dependent Travel. Dependents are only authorized to accompany the International Military Student (IMS) to the schoolhouses/courses identified in Table C10.T11., and select other courses where the Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) narrative specifically permits dependents.

Table C10.T11. Schoolhouses/Courses where Dependents are Authorized to Accompany the International Military Student 
(at No Cost to the United States Government).

Schoolhouses/Courses where Dependents are Authorized to Accompany the International Military Student

C10.12.2.1. The Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) may submit a request to the appropriate Military Department (MILDEP) for authorization to bring dependents to Schoolhouses/Courses not listed in Table C10.T11., or to other courses where the T-MASL does not specifically permit dependents. The decision to authorize dependents to accompany the IMS to training will be based on a case-by-case review of the ability of the schoolhouse and community to provide adequate family support and potential impact on the IMS ability to achieve course standards for completion. The MILDEPs may only authorize the IMS to bring those dependents to the United States who complete the required medical screening and have a medical healthcare coverage policy in place. (See Section C10.8.5.4. “Accompanying Family Member Medical Screening Requirements”). The MILDEP approval/assurance must be provided to the SCO and the International Military Student Office (IMSO) and, if appropriate, the Implementing Agency (IA) should update the international notes on the T-MASL to reflect authorization for dependents.

C10.12.2.2. Only authorized dependents who complete the required medical and security screening and have a medical healthcare coverage policy in place may be added to the Invitational Travel Order (ITO) (See Section C10.8.5.3.).

C10.12.2.3. USG funding (e.g., DoD and Department of State (State) funding), will not be used to provide transportation for authorized dependents. If authorized to bring dependents, the IMS may make arrangements to travel with the authorized dependents at their own expense if it does not impact their arrival for course reporting date or class attendance.

C10.12.2.4. The USG funded IMS may be reimbursed for the cost of their transportation when accompanying authorized dependents if U.S. flag carriers were used to the extent available and the ITO authorizes the IMS travel at USG (e.g., DoD or State) program expense. Reimbursement is at the U.S. military airlift tariff rate if U.S. military airlift transportation would have been the mode used through USG arrangements or the actual cost of travel, whichever is lower, or Category Z rate or the actual cost of travel, whichever is lower.

C10.13.1. Travel and Living Allowances for International Students Funded by United States Government Security Assistance and Security Cooperation Programs. The living allowance for International Military Students (IMSs) is intended to cover an average cost differential for the student living away from his/her home station. It is not a substitute for the IMS's normal method of compensation and/or pay. The IMS's government is responsible for timely payment of sufficient overall compensation and/or pay.

C10.13.1.1. International military or civilian students funded by USG security assistance (SA) and security cooperation (SC) programs are not subject to the regulations in the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), although their USG funded living allowance is computed using the locality per diem rates published in the JTR for temporary duty (TDY) travel. See Table C5.T8. “General Letter of Offer and Acceptance Preparation Responsibilities” for additional information.

C10.13.1.2. IMS Travel and Living Allowances (TLA) is not subject to long term TDY flat rate per diem rules in the JTR and will be based on the locality per diem rate for the duration of the IMS’s stay in continental United States (CONUS) or outside of the continental United States (OCONUS). See Table C10.T12.

C10.13.1.3. Table C10.T12. provides TLA rates for students receiving training under all USG funded SC and SA programs.

Table C10.T12. Daily Supplemental Living Allowances for International Military Students under United States Government Funded Security Assistance and Security Cooperation Programs

C10.13.2. Travel and Living Allowance on Foreign Military Sales and Foreign Military Financing Funded Letters of Offer and Acceptance. TLA is normally not part of a Foreign Military Sales (FMS)/Foreign Military Financing (FMF) case (See Section C4.5.1.). However, in exceptional situations, it may be included if the IMS’s travel is associated with formal or informal training, instruction, evaluations, or field training exercises that are part of the case and impart military skills to the IMS.

C10.13.2.1. The FMS purchaser must provide a written request to include TLA on a given FMS/FMF case. The Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) must ensure there is adequate case funding. If the case does not include adequate case funding, the FMS purchaser needs to provide a Letter of Request (LOR) to include the additional funds for TLA on the FMS/FMF case.

C10.13.2.2. TLA includes travel from country to CONUS training location (and also between training locations) and the living allowance comprised of lodging, meals and incidentals.

C10.13.2.3. Except as described in Section C4.5.1., the USG does not provide travel management for international partners when foreign partner personnel are not formally on Invitational Travel Orders (ITO) to participate in U.S.-provided formal or informal training, instruction, or evaluations. Accordingly, Foreign Liaison Officers (FLOs) and Country Liaison Officers (CLOs) are not eligible for TLA.

C10.13.2.4. The case as well as the ITO should also indicate that the TLA paid to the IMS is limited to the authorized living allowance rates in Table C10.T12. IMSs authorized TLA should be provided advance TLA prior to departing home country. The amount of the advance should be the greater of the following: a minimum of two weeks living allowance or the entire living allowance authorized if the total training duration is five weeks or less. The SCO will indicate the amount of the allowance paid on the ITO.

C10.13.2.5. If TLA costs are included on the LOA and the case is financed with FMF, U.S. carriers must be used for foreign personnel travel in accordance with the Fly America Act. The ITO may authorize the student to travel by military aircraft and reimburse the USG by direct bill at the non-government rate.

C10.13.2.6. Military Departments (MILDEPs) must charge appropriate management costs to administer payment of TLA to IMS under FMS cases. See Table C9.T2a.

C10.13.3. Travel and Living Allowance on Building Partner Capacity Cases. The Implementing Agency (IA) will coordinate training proposals with the DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)) and the Building Partner Capacity (BPC) Program Managers (PMs) to ensure CONUS or OCONUS training is appropriate and executable before including such training in the BPC memorandum of requirement (MOR). The IA may include appropriate TLA charges on BPC cases in accordance with the authorized living allowance rates in Table C10.T12. Approval from DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) to include TLA charges on the BPC MOR is not required. Refer to Section C15.3.5., to ensure that projected training schedules comply with period of performance restrictions applicable to the BPC program.

C10.13.4. Living Allowance for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program Students in Travel Status.

C10.13.4.1. United States Government Funded Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program Travel. When the SA/SC training program pays for travel, the IMS are entitled to living allowances during travel status, to include the day of departure from home country, through the day of arrival at their first training location. After training, living allowance in a travel status resumes the day of departure for home country, excluding any leave period authorized by the IMS's government following completion of training or any unauthorized delay in-route. IMSs are not authorized training program funded travel allowance for any portion if it duplicates a travel allowance paid by their government. Living allowances are computed incrementally in accordance with the JTR rules for U.S. military personnel on TDY, for the day of departure from home country or training location, and the day of arrival at the training location or home country. Same rules apply returning to home country from training location.

C10.13.4.2. International Military Student’s Own Government Funded Travel. An IMS who is authorized TLA, whose travel to the United States is paid by their own government or appropriated funds, is entitled to SA/SC Training Program-funded living allowances while in a travel status, to include the day of departure from the U.S. entry port in-route to the training location, through the day of arrival at the training location. Living allowance in a travel status resumes the day of departure from the last training location and includes the day of arrival at the U.S. departure point. These living allowances are paid at the full locality rate for each day that a living allowance is payable. Living allowance in a travel status also applies for the day of departure from the United States and includes the day of arrival at the home country.

C10.13.5. Authorization to Purchase Roundtrip Travel. When the IMS is scheduled to attend training for five weeks or less, the SCO is authorized to purchase roundtrip transportation and to pay the student total authorized living allowance entitlements at the time of departure. Government Transportation Request number (GTR #) and amounts paid for transportation and living allowances are annotated in the special conditions block of the ITO to prevent duplicate payment of entitlements.

C10.13.5.1. In some instances, for courses longer than five weeks where course dates do not change, it may be more cost effective for the SCO to purchase roundtrip transportation. These courses will be identified in the international notes of the Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) in the Security Assistance Network Web (SANWeb). The SCO should check with the MILDEP Country Manager to confirm if roundtrip transportation can be authorized. Roundtrip transportation should be annotated in the special conditions block of the ITO to prevent duplication of transportation payment.

C10.13.6. Living Allowance for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program Students in Training Status. Living allowance while in a training status commences the day after arrival at the training location. A living allowance is programmed for all students who are authorized TLA, which include students receiving training under the IMET program, Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP) (unless otherwise directed by the foreign partner), BPC cases (to include Title 10 and Title 22 funding sources), FMS/FMF-funded cases when approved in accordance with Section C10.13.2. or for other training programs where TLA is authorized in accordance with Section C10.17. For enlisted personnel, the full entitlement is not paid directly to the student. Enlisted personnel are paid a reduced stipend per week for the purchase of personal items, with the remainder programmed for reimbursement to the appropriate IA for laundry, cleaning service, and subsistence. See Table C10.T12. for TLA rates.

C10.13.6.1. Unauthorized Living Allowances for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program Students. Living allowances are not authorized for certain situations, See Table C10.T13.

Table C10.T13. Living Allowances Not Authorized

#

Living Allowances Not Authorized

1

Periods of unauthorized absence from duty

2

Excess travel time not authorized by the Implementing Agency administrative authority when proceeding by other than USG transportation

3

Periods of delay not in connection with training (except hospitalization or outpatient care)

4

Students whose country assumes the payment of all living costs

5

Periods of training conducted in the home country of the student and for students attending SA/SC Mobile Training Teams (MTTs), Mobile Education Teams (METs), or seminars in their own country unless justified and approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE)

6

Periods of leave for individuals on Orientation Tours (OTs) unless authorized by ITO.

7

Periods of leave authorized by IMS’ government following termination of training courses.

C10.13.7. Living Allowances for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program International Military Student in a Leave Status. Any IMS who receives a living allowance while in a training status may be granted leave with living allowance within CONUS during authorized holidays and periods between consecutive courses. If the IMS is required to maintain quarters or pay rent during authorized leave home, the IMS can be reimbursed for cost of maintaining quarters or paying rent while on authorized leave. The SCO and the IAs are jointly responsible for reviewing scheduled sequences of training for the individual student to determine whether additional training courses could be programmed to fill gaps between courses prior to preparation of the ITO.

C10.13.8. Advance Payment of Living Allowances for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program International Military Students. Up-front costs for students can be significant whether they are accompanied or unaccompanied and living off or on post/base. Most U.S. training locations are unable to provide advance TLA payments immediately upon arrival.

C10.13.8.1. An IMS authorized TLA should be provided advance TLA, equivalent to the U.S. military TLA for the same period, prior to departing their home country. The amount of the advance TLA should be a minimum of two weeks but could be up to 30 days if required by the training location, or the entire TLA authorized, if the total training duration is five weeks or less. The SCO will indicate on the ITO the amount of advance TLA issued to the IMS. In the event the home country government provides the IMS with an additional advance that covers the first 30 days, the SCO will not be required to provide advance TLA prior to the IMS's departure.

C10.13.8.2. The International Military Student Office (IMSO) is authorized to coordinate directly with the SCO to identify any reason the SCO did not issue the full entitlement, before issuing the IMS the difference if required to ensure the IMS is in a living allowance accrual process, whether living on or off post.

C10.13.8.3. Accompanied IMS living off post/base attending courses where dependents are encouraged (See Table C10.T11.), may draw a living allowance advance upon arrival in CONUS of an amount equal to the estimated living allowances for the first 45 days at a particular location.

C10.13.8.4. The IMS living allowance drawn during the period of training is adjusted to ensure that the amount of the advance is fully recovered before the student completes training at that location. The SCO/IMSO will work collaboratively to ensure that living allowance amounts advanced, prior to the IMS departure for training and upon arrival in CONUS, do not exceed the 45 day estimate.

C10.13.9. Settlement of Claims for Security Assistance/Security Cooperation Training Program International Military Student authorized to receive Travel and Living Allowance. The IMS is entitled to receive TLA settlement in advance of departure from a training location in order to settle lodging and baggage cost. The IMSO should notify the SCO how much TLA was issued to the IMS on the final travel voucher prior to departing from the training location. The voucher issued by the IMSO will be considered the final travel voucher unless the SCO is able to finalize the IMS travel voucher once the IMS returns to country.

C10.13.9.1. If the IMS travel voucher was finalized by the IMSO, and the IMS incurred additional TLA cost, the IMS will submit an amendment for any outstanding entitlements to the final travel voucher issued by the IMSO, through the SCO, no later than 15 calendar days after the IMS has returned to country. The SCO will review and approve the amendment and submit the voucher to the nearest U.S. paying agent for payment to the IMS in local currency at the authorized exchange rate.

C10.13.9.2. If it is determined that the IMS, who has departed the CONUS or OCONUS training location, was overpaid in CONUS or OCONUS by an amount in excess of the amount owed to the IMS upon submission of the final travel voucher, no attempt should be made to collect the overpayment from the IMS. The IA will determine whether a funding adjustment to the country's training program is necessary.

C10.13.10. Baggage. Authorized and unauthorized baggage information can be found in Table C10.T14., which does not apply to Regional Centers (RCs). SCOs should contact the RCs for the amounts of baggage that will be authorized for its participants.

Table C10.T14. Authorized and Unauthorized Baggage

Authorized Baggage

Allowances outlined below apply for the portion of the travel costs payable from U.S. appropriated funds. Baggage sizes and dimensions are to conform to carrier stipulations.

  1. Two pieces of checked baggage, not to exceed carrier stipulations, are authorized for IMSs when education/training is 12 weeks or less.
  2. Three total pieces of checked baggage, not to exceed carrier stipulations, are authorized for IMSs when education/training is 13 through 23 weeks.
  3. Four total pieces of checked baggage, not to exceed carrier stipulations, are authorized for IMSs when education/training is 24 weeks and longer.
  4. In addition to the allowance in paragraphs (1) through (3) above, one additional piece of baggage not to exceed carrier stipulations is authorized for the following IMS receiving U.S.-funded travel:
    1. When an IMS is accompanied by authorized dependents and is attending education/training programs listed in Table C10.T11.
    2. When an IMS is attending flight training or other long-term training that requires special (e.g., flight helmet), or excessively heavy uniform requirements.
  5. IMS are authorized to pay and be reimbursed the baggage surcharges for the authorized baggage cited above.

NOTE: If the airlines will not accommodate the authorized baggage cited above, the IMS should ship the unaccommodated, but authorized, baggage the most economical way (e.g., FEDEX, UPS, USPS), and seek reimbursement for that cost. Schoolhouse IMSOs should monitor the baggage policies and latest surcharge costs for the carriers used from their commonly-used airports for changes and inform SCOs when additional authorizations are needed on the ITOs.

Unauthorized Baggage

Shipment of baggage in excess of the weight allowance is not authorized. Disposition of unauthorized baggage is made at the expense of the student or the IMS’s government. Commanding officers of the training or administrative installation should ensure that unauthorized baggage is shipped at the student’s expense prior to his/her departure from the installation. IMSs reporting to ports of departure with unauthorized baggage are requested to forward the unauthorized baggage by commercial means at their expense. If lack of time prohibits this, the traffic representative takes unauthorized baggage into custody, and the IMS is given a receipt for the baggage. The IMS will travel on the scheduled flight or carrier. After departure, the traffic representative delivers the unauthorized baggage to the IMS’s consulate.

C10.14.1. Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), section 541 (22 U.S.C. 2347) and Arms Export Control Act (AECA), section 21 (22 U.S.C. 2761), establish the legal basis for a multi-tier pricing structure for training provided under the U.S. security assistance (SA) authorities. DoD 7000.14-R, Volume 15, Chapter 7, addresses training rates and pricing procedures. When a case is fully funded with Military Assistance Program (MAP) funds and/or Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Credit (Non-repayable), the tuition rate excludes military pay and entitlements in accordance with FAA section 503(a) (22 U.S.C. 2311(a)); refer to Rate D. If, however, the FMS case has a mix of funds and is not fully funded with MAP funds and/or FMS Credit (Non-repayable), the tuition rate will include military pay and entitlements; refer to Rate C. Countries and organizations are eligible for a specific rate as follows:

C10.14.1.1. Rate A (Formerly Foreign Military Sales Full Rate). Countries and organizations purchasing training via an FMS case and not eligible for one of the FMS pricing categories listed below are charged Rate A.

C10.14.1.2. Rate B (Formerly Foreign Military Sales North Atlantic Treaty Organization Rate). Countries with a ratified reciprocal pricing agreement with the USG purchasing training via an FMS case are charged Rate B. Table C10.T15. lists the countries and effective dates of the reciprocal agreements. Note that some of these countries are also eligible for Rate C.

Table C10.T15. NATO Reciprocal Agreement Participants

Country

Effective Date

Albania (ALB)

JAN 2015

Belgium (BEL)

MAR 2013

Bulgaria (BGR)

JAN 2014

Canada (CAN)

JUL 2014

Croatia (HRV)

MAY 2012

Czech Republic (CZE)

NOV 2013

Denmark (DNK)

AUG 2014

Estonia (EST)

JUN 2012

France (FRA)

MAY 2012

Germany (DEU)

JUN 2012

Greece (GRC)

NOV 2012

Hungary (HUN)

MAY 2012

Italy (ITA)

JUN 2012

Latvia (LVA)

MAR 2012

Lithuania (LTU)

NOV 2011

Luxembourg (LUX)

SEP 2016

Netherlands (NLD)

MAR 2016

Norway (NOR)

JUN 2012

Poland (POL)

JAN 2012

Portugal (PRT)

FEB 2017

Romania (ROU)

FEB 2012

Slovak Republic (SVK)

JUN 2012

Slovenia (SVN)

JUN 2012

Spain (ESP)

NOV 2012

Republic of Turkiye (TUR)

MAR 2013

United Kingdom (GBR)

OCT 2011

Table C10.T16. Other Reciprocal Agreement Participants

 

Country

Effective Date

Australia

DEC 1981

Israel

JUN 1988

Japan

JAN 1986

New Zealand

APR 1982

C10.14.1.3. Rate C (Formerly Foreign Military Sales Incremental Rate). Countries currently in receipt of International Military Education and Training (IMET) or designated as a high-income foreign country, in accordance with the FAA, Section 546(b) (22 U.S.C. 2347e(b) (Austria, Finland, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Spain) and purchasing training via an FMS case using their own national funds, are eligible for Rate C. DSCA (Office of Business Operations (OBO)) maintains the DSCA IMET Allocation Database System (DIADS) that identifies countries currently receiving IMET. Refer questions on a country's IMET status to DSCA (OBO). Organizations receiving/purchasing training via Section 607 of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2357) also qualify for this rate. See Section C9.4.3.1.2., for additional management information for situations where an IMET eligible country does not have IMET funding continued into the subsequent year.

C10.14.1.4. Rate D. Training on a case financed with U.S. appropriated funds receives Rate D. Training in this category is on cases financed with FMS Credit (non-repayable), or Building Partner Capacity (BPC) programs. This rate is identical to Rate E except that the FMS administrative surcharge will be applied to it.

C10.14.1.5. Rate E (Formerly International Military Education and Training Rate). Training financed by the IMET appropriation is priced at Rate E.

C10.15.1. Charges for Course Cancellations or Withdrawals. For certain dedicated (all international) and contract courses, a 100 percent penalty is charged for cancellation unless filled by another student. For all other courses, if the country requests cancellation or rescheduling less than 60 days prior to the course start date, the country’s International Military Education and Training (IMET) program (or other grant program) or Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case is charged 50 percent unless filled by another student. The penalties will be reviewed and adjusted annually by the Implementing Agencies (IAs). These charges are reflected for each cancelled course assessed a cancellation penalty and the respective training line will be annotated with the code “FO” in the Training Line Status column to indicate forfeiture and that a penalty fee was charged. Exceptions are as follows:

C10.15.1.1. A country whose International Military Student (IMS) does not complete a course of instruction is also charged a proportionate share of the tuition rate. The IA assesses late cancellation charges for all Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC) training lines that are canceled within the 60-day period and determine all other applicable penalty charges. The training line funding status has no bearing on whether the cancellation charge applies.

C10.15.1.2. The cancellation penalty is not applied when the cancellation is due to decisions by the United States, (i.e., budget continuing resolution (CR) limits available grant funding, sanctions, deletion or rescheduling of classes), the cancellation is due to unavoidable circumstances within the country (i.e., national disaster), or the quota is used by the United States or another country. If the IA is requested by DSCA, in coordination with Department of State, Bureau of Political and Military Affairs (State (PM)) not to cancel courses within 60 days of course start, in anticipation of CR funds being made available, the IMET program will be charged 50 percent cancellation fee unless filled by another student.

C10.15.2. Sanctions. Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), section 620(q) (22 U.S.C. 2370(q)) sanctions are triggered when a country is in default more than six calendar months in payments to the United States of principal or interest on any loan made under the FAA. The sanction does not impact use of Foreign Military Financing (FMF) appropriations (FMS Credit funds, both repayable and non-repayable). The Brooke Amendment, found in yearly foreign operations appropriations acts, is triggered when a country is in default during a period in excess of one calendar year in payments to the United States of principal or interest on any loan pursuant to a program for which funds were appropriated for that act. The Brooke Amendment does impact the use of FMS Credit funds (both repayable and non-repayable). IMET is impacted by both Section 620(q) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. 2370(q)), and the Brooke Amendment sanctions. State will advise DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) when these sanctions are effective and when they are lifted or waived.

C10.15.2.1. For the purposes of the Brooke Amendment sanctions, an IMET-funded course begins on the report date specified in the Standard Training List (STL). Sequential training (proceeding to the next scheduled course) is reviewed by the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE), DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)), and DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)) on a case-by-case basis. If the IMET-funded course costs have been obligated before the effective date of the Brooke Amendment sanctions, the student is permitted to begin training. If course costs have not been obligated before the effective date of the Brooke Amendment sanction, the student is not permitted to begin the course. If sanctions are lifted, these students can be considered for late admittance or admittance to the next available course of study or training program.

C10.15.2.1.1. IMET-funded Mobile Training Teams (MTTs) and Language Training Detachments (LTDs) may not be dispatched or extended beyond their scheduled termination date, if under sanctions.

C10.15.2.1.2. IMET-funded training aids may not be issued from supply nor placed on contract by the supplying agency, if under sanctions.

C10.16.1. The DoD Regional Centers (RCs) for Security Studies are international venues for the exchange of ideas among nations. Each center covers a geographical area based on the Unified Command Plan. Through classroom-based activities, research, and outreach, the six centers build partner capacity, human and institutional, consistent with U.S. policy goals. See Table C10.T17. for RC Web Sites.

Table C10.T17. Department of Defense Regional Center Web Sites

Regional Center Name and Location

Web Address

Africa Center for Strategic Studies Logo

Africa Center for Strategic Studies (ACSS)
(Washington, D.C.; Ethiopia; and Senegal)

https://www.africacenter.org

Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Logo

Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (DKI APCSS)
(Honolulu, HI)

https://dkiapcss.edu/

William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies Logo

William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (WJPC)
(Washington, D.C.)

https://wjpcenter.org/

George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies Logo

George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies (GCMC)
(Garmisch-Partenkirchen Germany)

https://www.marshallcenter.org/

Near East-South Asia Center for Strategic Studies Logo

Near East-South Asia Center for Strategic Studies (NESA)
(Washington, D.C. and Bahrain)

https://www.nesa-center.org

Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies Logo

Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies (TSC)
(Joint Base Elemendorf-Richardson, Anchorage Alaska)

https://tedstevensarcticcenter.org/

C10.16.2. The statutory mission of the RCs is to study security issues relating to specified geographic regions of the world by serving as forums for bilateral and multilateral research, communication, and exchange of ideas involving military and civilian participants (10 U.S.C. 342). In response to complex security challenges, cooperation among the five centers is increasing, with joint programs and participants from multiple regions, as warranted by the topic.

C10.16.3. Regional Centers Engage Regional Participants in a Global Context. Although the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) assigns regions of primary interest for the RCs, they also engage participants outside of their regions when external actors strongly influence the region, or the substantive security issues associated with a specific center activity are enhanced with out-of-sector participation.

C10.16.4. The RCs develop and implement activities in accordance with policy guidance and oversight from the USD(P) implemented by the Combatant Commands (CCMDs). DSCA supports the RCs through programming, budgeting, financial management of operation and maintenance costs, human resources services support, and personnel management.

C10.16.5. Participation. Participation in the activities of the RCs is on a reimbursable basis, although delegations of authority allow each center to waive participation costs, subject to center-specific limitations. International Military Education and Training (IMET) and Expanded IMET(E-IMET) funding is not available for the RCs, but they may compete for such funding as the Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP), Warsaw Initiative Funds (WIF), and CCMD Initiative Funds. The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) process may be used for countries to pay for travel, lodging, and per diem costs for foreign participants. The centers are also authorized to accept gifts or donations for the purposes of defraying the cost, or enhancing the operation of the center (10 U.S.C. 2611). Participants in activities of the RCs may include U.S. and foreign military, civilian, and nongovernmental personnel.

C10.16.5.1. The target audience for RC programs is typically mid-to-high-level civilian government officials, military officers, parliamentarians, academics, non-governmental, and international organization leaders who are either current or future leaders of their country serving in defense, security, foreign affairs, disaster management or counterterrorism positions.

C10.16.6. Health Insurance for Regional Centers. Participants traveling to an RC program or event (e.g., course, seminar, conference, workshop, etc.) are responsible for meeting any and all healthcare coverage requirements required by the country where the RC event is being held. The host RC will advise event participants of any corresponding requirements. See Section C10.8.5.9. “Regional Centers” and Section C10.9.8.8. “Regional Centers Responsibilities” for additional healthcare coverage requirements.

C10.16.6.1. Attendees are encouraged to obtain or have medical insurance for themselves and/or any family member that might accompany them to any RC courses or events.

C10.17.1. African Contingency Operations Training and Assistance. The African Contingency Operations Training and Assistance (ACOTA) program provides training of African troops in peacekeeping and humanitarian crisis response. For information on this program contact AFRICOM’s J-5.

C10.17.2. Aviation Leadership Program. The Aviation Leadership Program (ALP) provides undergraduate pilot training (UPT) to a small number of selected International Military Students (IMSs) from friendly, less-developed countries. The ALP is a U.S. Air Force-funded program authorized under 10 U.S.C. 348. The ALP consists of English language training, UPT, and necessary related training, as well as programs to promote better awareness and understanding of the democratic institutions and social framework of the United States. ALP funds may be used to pay Travel and Living Allowance (TLA) to International Military Students (IMSs) on the same basis as International Military Education and Training (IMET) fund. Contact the Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force for International Affairs (SAF/IA) for information on ALP.

C10.17.3. Bilateral or Regional Cooperation Programs. Under 10 U.S.C. 312, the Secretary of Defense may pay travel, subsistence, and similar personal expenses of defense personnel of developing countries in connection with attendance at bilateral or regional conferences, seminars or similar meetings if the Secretary of Defense deems attendance in the U.S. national security interest. Questions on this subject should be directed to the Combatant Command (CCMD).

C10.17.4. Combatant Commander Initiative Funds. Under 10 U.S.C. 166a, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) may provide funds to the Combatant Commanders (CCDRs) for military education and training of military and related civilian personnel of foreign countries (to include transportation, translation, and administrative expenses). This authority provides funding for activities such as force training, contingencies, selected operations, Command and Control, joint exercises (including activities of foreign countries), Humanitarian and Civil Assistance, military education and training, bilateral or regional cooperation programs, and force protection. An annual dollar limitation is legislated each year. Questions on this subject should be directed to the CCMD.

C10.17.5. Disaster Response (Humanitarian Assistance program). Humanitarian Assistance (HA), including training in disaster response and/or disaster preparedness, is authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2561. Normally, HA and training conducted under 10 U.S.C. 2561 is not provided to foreign militaries; however, military members of the host nation are occasionally included in the training so that the military understands its role in supporting the civilian government during a disaster response. The ultimate goal of disaster response training is to improve host nation capability to effectively respond to disasters, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for U.S. military response. The training is conducted in the foreign country at no charge. The foreign country pays TLA expenses for its personnel. See Chapter 12 for information on HA programs.

C10.17.6. Drawdowns of Training.

C10.17.6.1. Under the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), section 506(a)(1) (22 U.S.C. 2318), the President may direct the drawdown of defense services (to include education and training) from the DoD if he or she determines and reports to Congress in accordance with FAA, section 552 (22 U.S.C. 2348a), that an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to a foreign country or international organization; and that such emergency requirement cannot be met under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) or any other law except this section. , provides for drawdown of commodities and services from the inventory and resources of any agency of the USG of an aggregate value not to exceed $25M in any fiscal year (FY) for peacekeeping.

C10.17.6.2. Under FAA, section 506(a)(2) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(2)), the President must determine and report to Congress in accordance with FAA, section 652 (22 U.S.C. 2411), that it is in the national interest of the United States to drawdown articles and services from the inventory of any USG agency and military education and training from the DoD .

10.17.6.3. Under FAA, section 506(a)(1) (22 U.S.C. 2318) and section 506(a)(2) (22 U.S.C. 2318), tuition for military education and training is provided at no cost to the foreign government. IMS travel may be funded from the Military Department’s (MILDEP’s) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds if the foreign recipient is not able to assume the cost. An IMS may stay in a Bachelor Officer Quarters (BOQ) or Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) and use dining facilities if operated by DoD funds; a living allowance is not provided to the IMS.

C10.17.7. Exchanges.

C10.17.7.1. Foreign Assistance Act, Section 544 - Exchange Training. FAA, section 544 (22 U.S.C. 2347c) authorizes reciprocal Professional Military Education (PME) exchanges. The President may provide for the attendance of foreign military personnel at PME institutions in the United States (other than MILDEP Academies), without charge, if such attendance is part of an international agreement.

C10.17.7.1.1. These international agreements provide for the exchange of students on a one-for-one reciprocal basis each FY between the U.S. PME institutions and comparable institutions of foreign countries and international organizations (IOs). Each country or IO is responsible for paying its own students’ TLA.

C10.17.7.1.2. Institutions specifically included are the U.S. MILDEPs’ Command and Staff Colleges and War Colleges, Joint Forces Staff College, Naval Postgraduate School, and the Air Force Institute of Technology. MILDEPs are authorized to designate schools as PME institutions for security cooperation (SC) training.

C10.17.7.1.3. Requests for new PME exchange agreements or for extensions to existing PME exchange agreements should be sent to DSCA (Front Office, Office of the General Counsel (FO/OGC)) in coordination with the DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) so that an umbrella (DoD and/or Ministry of Defense (MoD)) level exchange agreement is negotiated and completed.

C10.17.7.1.4. Specific MILDEP-level requests are sent to the IA after the DoD-level agreement is in place. The Joint Security Cooperation Education and Training Regulation (JSCET) provides the prescribed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) format for this purpose.

C10.17.7.2. Arms Export Control Act, Section 30A - Exchange of Training and Related Support. The AECA, section 30A (22 U.S.C. 2770), authorizes the President to provide training and related support (e.g., transportation, food services, health services, logistics, and the use of facilities and equipment) to military and civilian defense personnel of a friendly foreign country or international organization. Such training and related support are provided through the MILDEPs.

C10.17.7.2.1. Exchanges conducted under this authority are arranged under international agreements negotiated for such purposes and are integrated into the theater campaign plan (TCP) of the relevant CCDR. Recipient countries provide, on a reciprocal basis, comparable training and related support; however, each country is responsible for paying its students' TLA. The related reciprocal training and support must be provided within one year. Should the foreign country or international organization not provide comparable training and support, the United States must be reimbursed for the full costs of training and support it provided.

C10.17.7.2.2. Exchanges conducted under this authority may be carried out on either an individual-to-individual or unit-to-unit basis.

C10.17.7.2.3. The JSCET Regulation provides detailed implementing instructions, to include the prescribed international MOA used to carry out training exchanges. DSCA (FO/OGC) is responsible for drafting and negotiating these agreements.

C10.17.7.2.4. Requests for exchanges are forwarded to the appropriate MILDEP for action with an information copy to the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

C10.17.7.2.5. Pricing guidelines and conversion to reimbursable training when reciprocal training or related support is not provided or not received, is included in DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD FMR) 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 10.

C10.17.8. Flight Training Exchanges. FAA, section 544 (22 U.S.C. 2347c), authorizes the exchange of comparable flight training. Flight Training Exchanges (FTEs) must be pursuant to an international agreement, which provides for the exchange of students on a one-for-one basis during the same U.S. FY. The JSCET Regulation provides the prescribed MOA used for this purpose. FTE requests are forwarded to the Implementing Agency (IA) for action with an information copy to DSCA (FO/OGC) and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

C10.17.9. Humanitarian Mine Action. Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) programs provide training to foreign nations in humanitarian mine clearance operations (10 U.S.C. 407). CCMDs execute HMA programs. The training is conducted in the foreign country at no charge. The foreign country pays foreign student TLA expenses. See Chapter 12.

C10.17.10. Humanitarian Assistance. A HA effort pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2561 may include the provision of training to foreign security force participants provided that the purpose of such training constitutes HA. For example, an HA effort to provide training to build a foreign partner’s capacity to respond to a natural disaster may include MoD participants who would be tasked as part of the foreign partner’s disaster response. The primary purpose of such assistance would be to improve the foreign partner’s disaster preparedness for the benefit of the civilian populace.

C10.17.11. International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement. International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE), a Department of State (State) program, authorized in the FAA, sections 481-490 (22 U.S.C. 2291-2291n), has two strategic goals to minimize the impact of international crime on, and reduce the entry of illegal drugs into the United States. The INCLE training programs strengthen foreign criminal justice sectors and promote international cooperation. Training provided through the FMS system using INCLE funds is governed by the same laws and policies as those outlined for Foreign Military Financing (FMF), and must also meets the requirements of the INCLE authority.

C10.17.12. Joint Combined Exchange Training. JCET events are planned two years before the event with concurrence from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (OUSD(P) and State. The JCET program permits U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) to train in a foreign country through interaction with foreign military forces and is authorized by 10 U.S.C. 322. It enhances SOF skills, such as instructor skills, language proficiency, and cultural immersion. DoD directly funds the SOF JCET program for the primary purpose of training U.S. SOF personnel, although incidental-training benefits may accrue to the foreign friendly forces at no cost. The foreign government pays TLA expenses for its participants. The United States may pay the incremental expenses incurred by a foreign country as the direct result of this training. Incremental expenses include the reasonable and proper cost of rations, fuel, training, ammunition, transportation, and other goods and services consumed by the country. Pay, allowances, and other personnel costs are excluded.

C10.17.13. Building Partner Capacity for Foreign Security Forces. Building Partner Capacity for Foreign Security Forces (10 U.S.C. 333) assistance may include training at no charge to the foreign country to build the capacity of foreign security forces to conduct certain types of operations. The Building Partner Capacity (BPC) training rate is identical to the IMET rate except that the FMS administrative surcharge will be applied to it (See Section C10.14.1.4.). Section 333 funds may be used to pay travel and supplemental living allowance to the IMS based on the established IMET rate.

C10.17.14. Regional Defense Fellowship Program. The Regional Defense Fellowship Plan (RDFP) is designed to address key challenges in irregular warfare globally, regionally, and in specific countries through tailored education and training programs. It is permanently authorized by 10 U.S.C. 345. The RDFP provides a unique and flexible tool to focus efforts toward building partner capacity to meet specific combatant commander objectives. Contact the Defense Security Cooperation University for questions regarding the RDFP.

C10.17.15. Section 1004 - Counter-Drug Training Support. NOTE - Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY1991 was repealed by the NDAA for FY2017, and the authority to conduct counter-drug training of foreign forces now resides in 10 U.S.C. 333.

C10.17.16. Military Department Academy Programs. DoD’s three MILDEP Academies admit foreign students to the full four-year programs, and also conduct academic exchange programs of varying length and content. Foreign cadets must meet all academy prerequisites and receive the same pay and allowances as their U.S. counterparts. Up to 40 foreign students may attend each MILDEP Academy at any one time as members of an Academy class. Countries reimburse the program cost (to include the living allowance) to the MILDEP Academy unless a full or partial waiver of costs is granted by USD(P). The management of the Military Academy Programs has been transferred to DSCA. Additional guidance is forthcoming - in the interim, please contact the CCMD Training Manager or DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) for programming guidance. See 10.U.S.C. 347.

C10.17.17. Cadet Semester Exchange Abroad Program. The parent (sending) MILDEP is responsible for the basic pay and living allowance for their cadets and all travel costs associated with transporting their cadets to and from the host (receiving) Air Force Academy. The host Air Force Academy provides the exchange cadets with billeting and subsistence and the cost of travel during training.

C10.17.18. United States Coast Guard Academy Foreign Cadet Program. 14 U.S.C. 1923 authorizes a limited number of foreign national appointments (maximum of 36) to the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Academy. Cadets can earn a Bachelor of Science degree in marine engineering and naval architecture, electrical engineering, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, marine and environmental sciences, management, or government. The foreign government must agree in advance to reimburse the USCG for all costs incurred for a cadet’s training at the USCG Academy, except when a waiver is granted by the Commandant, USCG. Countries must agree that upon graduation, the cadet will serve in the comparable maritime Service of his or her country for an appropriate period of time.

C10.17.19. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency International Program. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) conducts specialized training in geospatial intelligence at the National Geospatial-Intelligence College (NGC). NGC accepts IMSs through FMS and IMET. Eligible foreign governments may receive tuition-free training through NGA’s bilateral agreements. In the bilateral program, sponsor governments must cover per diem and travel expenses for their IMS. SCOs should process bilateral IMS in the same manner as FMS and IMET students, except for annotating on the ITOs that the training is tuition-free in accordance with the bilateral agreement.

C10.17.20. Specialized Training.

C10.17.20.1. Observer Training. During Observer Training, the IMS observes methods of operation, techniques, and procedures. Observer Training is not part of a formal course of instruction although it sometimes supplements or follows a student’s formal training. Observer Training is authorized only if a course covering the desired training is not available. This includes specialist-type training. Certain Observer Training explicitly excludes “hands on” training. For example, foreign personnel enrolled under Medical Observer Training are prohibited from hands-on patient care.

C10.17.20.2. On-the-Job Training or Familiarization Training. On-the-job training (OJT) is follow-on technical training devoted to practical application conducted after attendance at a formal course of instruction. This training is planned in advance as part of the country’s training program. For IMET, OJT conducted independently and not in conjunction with formal courses of instruction is authorized in the United States only if a course covering the desired training is not available. OJT in overseas schools and installations is provided in accordance with CCMD or MILDEP policies, dependent on the training sponsor.

C10.17.20.3. Orientation Tours. Orientation tours (OTs) familiarize selected mid--and-senior-level foreign military personnel with U.S. military training and doctrine. These tours may be designated as Distinguished Visitor Orientation Tours (DVOTs) if there are General Officers or equivalent MoD civilian personnel in the delegation. These tours are hand-tailored, short, intensive education programs that meet the specific needs of the country. National Defense University (NDU) is responsible for conducting OTs and DVOTs sponsored by the SC training program. These tours are limited to countries with lesser-developed defense relationships with the United States (e.g., new IMET recipient countries), unless extraordinary circumstances exist. In addition to the military objectives, OTs serve to enhance the United States’ and participating nation’s mutual understanding, cooperation, and friendship. See Section C10.6.3.5., for DVOT additional information. See Section C10.11.1.2., for additional information regarding the requirement for Foreign Visit Requests (FVR) and ITO for DVOT participants.

C10.17.20.3.1. Orientation Tour Requirements. See the NDU DVOT Program Overview and Desk Top Reference - available at https://ismo.ndu.edu/ISMO-Programs/International-Visits/DVOT-Program/. Some OTs are eligible for IMET funding. When submitting orientation tour requirements, the positions held by the visiting officers must be indicated.

C10.17.20.3.1.1. Requests for OTs at the Chief of Staff and higher levels are not funded under IMET and should be referred to the corresponding U.S. element for funding and other action.

C10.17.20.3.1.2. DVOTs are funded with IMET, FMF or FMS. The country must have available IMET funds or have an open FMS or FMF case that can be used to fund the DVOT. IMET and FMF funded DVOTs are authorized for senior country officials holding positions of major importance and high authority below the equivalent U.S. position of Chief of Staff or Chief of Naval Operations. All FMS, FMF and IMET-funded DVOTs must be approved by DSCA (DSCU/IMTE). If the visit includes visits to a senior Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) or Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) office, then a similar visit to State will be scheduled.

C10.17.20.3.1.3. DVOTs should not exceed fourteen calendar days plus overseas travel time and should be limited to not more than five visitors per tour. Travel arrangements (mode of transportation for overseas and domestic travel) and accommodations should be comparable to those provided U.S. personnel under similar circumstances.

C10.17.20.3.1.4. OTs (not DVOTs) are authorized for selected officers who may become future leaders and policy makers. Tours should be restricted in number (not more than seven visitors per tour) and limited primarily to international military participants. OT/DVOTs to visit the U.S. Military academies are not authorized. The FAA, section 636(g) (22 U.S.C. 2396(g)), provides the authority to reimburse the expenses of U.S. military officers detailed in connection with orientation visits of foreign military and related civilian personnel.

C10.17.20.3.1.5. Medical Screening, Security screening and Human Rights Screening (Leahy Vetting) are required for all OT and DVOT participants. Human Rights Screening (Leahy Vetting) is not required if the tour is funded with FMS/partner nation Funds. DVOT and OT participants funded by FMF and IMET are covered for emergency medical treatment only. See Section C10.8., for specific screening requirements.

C10.17.20.3.2. Country Team Evaluation of Orientation Tours. Prior to any proposal to country officials, which could be construed as an agreement to provide a tour, the SCO should coordinate with the NDU OT/DVOT Manager to ensure the request meets OT guidance. Once the coordination is complete, the SCO will forward the OT requests to the CCMD, DSCA, NDU, and the IA, with supporting rationale and justification for approval.

NOTE: A fillable OT/DVOT request form and worksheet are available in Security Assistance Network Web (SANweb)/Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS) under FORMS. IMET-funded OTs are programmed only after the SCO Chief attests to their importance to the country’s efforts and the SCO forwards the request for approval. OTs should not comprise a major portion of an established program nor be a routine use of country program funds.

C10.17.20.3.3. Participant selection and itinerary design should be based on maximum accomplishment of objectives. Where OT objectives are specific in terms of exposure to specialized techniques, procedures, and facility operation, the schedule should be designed accordingly, as opposed to tours in which the objective is broad exposure to concepts, higher-level decision-making, management, and staff operation.

C10.17.20.3.4. Official Entertainment for Orientation Tours. Official entertainment in connection with OTs (e.g., luncheons, dinners and receptions) should be in keeping with the grade and position of tour participants.

C10.17.20.3.5. Assignment of Escort Officers for Orientation Tours. When lack of English fluency of the participants makes a language-qualified escort essential to tour objectives, every effort is made to provide one. SCO representatives should not be used as escort officers for IMET-sponsored OTs. However, in exceptional cases and with prior approval of DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) a SCO representative may serve as an escort officer. This is justified when special qualifications, workload, unusual rapport with key host nation personnel, and associated projects or contacts may be useful. The SCO representative selected as an escort officer is under the complete jurisdiction of the executive agency (NDU) and remains with the tour at all times until the tour participants return to host nation. Temporary duty (TDY) travel and per diem costs for the escort officer for the duration of the tour are chargeable to IMET funds and are programmed as a separate line in the country program under budget project N70. U.S. personnel other than bona fide escort officers designated or agreed to by NDU for tour implementation are not authorized to accompany tour groups. The dollar value of escort officer expenses is programmed in the TLA data field.

C10.17.20.3.6. Responsibilities for Orientation Tours. While every effort is made to meet SCO recommendations, the tour agenda is the responsibility of NDU and the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) and DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)). NDU must clear all itineraries with the DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) prior to releasing the proposed agenda to the country team.

C10.17.20.3.7. When authorized in the ITO, leave may be taken by tour participants at the conclusion of an OT at no additional expense to IMET.

C10.17.21. Global Peace Operation Initiative. The Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI) program promotes burden sharing and enhances national and regional capability to support Peacekeeping Operation (PKO) using core curriculum for PKO education and training and procurement of non-lethal defense-related training equipment. A Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case is used to purchase this type of training with the GPOI funding identified. See Appendix 8 Program - Peacekeeping Operations..

C10.18.1. In accordance with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5410.17, each International Military Student (IMS) attending a formal course in the United States under security cooperation (SC) and other related programs is given the opportunity to participate in the U.S. Field Studies Program (FSP). The FSP objective is to provide a view of U.S. society, institutions, and goals, outside the classroom. The FSP should include discussion with the IMS on the facets of Human Rights with a focus on Diversity and American Life, USG Institutions, Political Processes, Judicial System, Free Market System, Education, Health and Human Services, Media, International Peace and Security, and Law of War, and the way in which all of these elements reflect the U.S. commitment to the basic principles of internationally recognized human rights. Implementing Agencies (IAs) are responsible for FSP implementation. Cost factors for implementing the FSP are developed by the IAs and included in course tuition costs.

C10.18.2. Field Studies Program Participation. The FSP applies to international students and military-sponsored visitors in the United States under the SC training program. As appropriate to the surrounding environment, the FSP also applies to DoD training installations overseas performing SC military training functions. While students are given the opportunity to participate in the FSP, it is not mandatory unless it is part of a course Program of Instruction.

C10.18.3. IAs are responsible for reviewing all proposed FSP activities to ensure they meet the objectives of the FSP. Any questionable activities should be referred to the DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) and DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)) for approval prior to implementation. FSP activities include transportation, meals, lodging, admissions, programs, and related incidental expenses. The IMS is required to pay for personal shopping and services such as laundry and telephone and other costs not directly associated with the programmed tour. FSP funds, at a Military Department (MILDEP)-determined limit, may be used to purchase distinctive medallions, plaques, or ornaments, one per IMS, which serve to commemorate the IMS’s experience in participating in a particular FSP activity.

C10.18.4. Use of Local Civic Groups. FSP activities should involve local civic groups, organizations, agencies, facilities, and historical sites. The majority of FSP activities should take place in the civilian community so that students gain an understanding of the United States outside of their classroom experience.

C10.18.5. Visits to Washington, D.C. Under the FSP, MILDEPs designated officer and senior enlisted IMS enrolled in specific courses are encouraged to participate in an official visit to Washington, D.C. A maximum of four days plus travel time is authorized for this event. Washington, D.C. trips are limited to one per IMS. If the IMS changes training locations, IMSOs should verify the IMS has not previously attended the Washington, D.C. trip.

C10.18.6. Entertainment and Social Activities. Entertainment and social events are not a major element of the program. Social activities arranged for IMSs should include a mixture of U.S. military, civilian guests, and IMSs whenever possible.

C10.18.7. Duty Status of Students. IMSs participating in FSP tours are considered to be in a duty status. The living allowances authorized for an IMS are the allowances at their training centers.

C10.18.8. Dependent Participation. Dependents that are authorized to accompany IMSs in the United States are allowed to participate in selected FSP activities, subject to availability and at no cost to the program.

C10.19.1. As soon as the International Military Student Office (IMSO) has verified that the International Military Student (IMS) is absent from scheduled activities without proper authorization, the IMS will be considered in an unauthorized absence (UA) status (also referred to as absent without official leave (AWOL)). There is not a DoD requirement to wait 24 hours before making the UA determination. Every IMS who is UA is considered a potential threat to national security, so prompt notification of UA is critical; however, a high degree of certainty must be applied prior to making a notification of UA.

C10.19.1.1. When an IMS is determined to be in a UA status while in travel from one training installation to a follow-on training location, the IMSO at the IMS’s last installation is responsible for notification and reporting requirements (after coordinating with the next installation). The following actions will be taken when an IMS is in a UA status.

C10.19.2. International Military Student Officer Responsibilities. The IMSO must carefully check IMS accountability records before making a determination of UA to ensure that the IMS is not absent because of misunderstanding the schedule, sick in quarters/local hospital, or for other plausible reasons. Once the IMSO verifies that the IMS is UA, the IMSO will accomplish the following notification actions:

C10.19.2.1. Notify the Department of Homeland Security/Immigration and Customs Enforcement/Counter Threat Lead Development Unit (DHS/ICE/CTLD) by email at CTLD@ice.dhs.gov; the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) at dcsa.quantico.dcsa.mbx.esc@mail.mil; the appropriate Military Department (MILDEP) training manager and country program manager; the Combatant Command (CCMD) Training Office; and DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) at DSCA.IMTEPP-AWOL@mail.mil. The notification should include, but is not limited to the items listed in Table C10.T18.

Table C10.T18. Information to be provided on student Unauthorized Absence

Information to be provided on student Unauthorized Absence

  • IMS full name and country of citizenship/origin
  • Passport and visa information
  • Effective date and time of absence
  • Date of birth
  • Place of birth
  • Last known location
  • Last known mobile telephone number of IMS
  • Case identification or Work Control Number (WCN)
  • Type of training and any follow on training for which the IMS is programmed
  • Travel circumstances (flight arrangements, layovers)
  • Any information concerning events that may have contributed to the UA status
  • Known variations in name spelling or alias - check against passport and visa
  • Known relatives or friends and contact information in the United States
  • Information on U.S. driver’s license (e.g., number, issuing State, expiration date)
  • Information and copy of any DoD identification (ID) cards issued
  • Available financial information, including bank accounts, Credit/Debit card information
  • Foreign Identification Number (FIN)
  • US Equivalent Rank
  • Invitational Travel Order (ITO)

C10.19.2.1.1. Notify all organizations if an IMS previously reported as being in a UA status voluntarily returns to a DoD training installation or is known to be detained by local authorities.

C10.19.2.2. Notify the appropriate DoD ID card office to ensure the ID card is cancelled.

C10.19.2.3. Notify the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) finance officer to post UA information to the IMS’s DD Form 1588 to cancel service to preclude unauthorized payments.

C10.19.2.4. Notify installation lodging to cancel service.

C10.19.2.5. Ensure the proper progress message (e.g., AWOL-TG) is entered in the Security Assistance Network Web (SANweb) and Defense Security Assistance Management System - Training Module (DSAMS-TM).

C10.19.2.6. Notify the military installation Staff Judge Advocate who should be aware of USG consular notification requirements if the IMS is later arrested.

C10.19.2.7. Request designated Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) provide instructions for disposition of IMS’s personal effects from the Ministry of Defense (MoD) of the IMS. Cost for shipping and handling will be charged to the corresponding funding line of the IMS.

C10.19.3. Military Department Responsibilities:

C10.19.3.1. Forward all information received from the IMSO to the relevant SCO, CCMD, and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) Both the IMSO and the MILDEP provide notification to ensure the information is received.

C10.19.3.2. Notify relevant Military Criminal Investigative Organization (e.g., Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), and Army Criminal Investigation Command (Army CID)).

C10.19.3.3. Provide a declaration of UA to DHS/ICE/CTLD, signed by the MILDEP headquarters element. Declaration will include the UA IMS’s name, date of birth, country of birth, country of citizenship, date of absence, and passport and visa numbers. In the e-mail to ICE (directed to CTLD@ice.dhs.gov) that provides the scanned copy of the declaration, the MILDEP will include any information on the DoD point of contact and any information on the IMS’s relatives in the United States, including notation of any relative of prominence.

C10.19.3.4. In coordination with DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) provide disposition instructions to the installation for any IMS in a UA status who voluntarily returns to a DoD installation.

C10.19.4. Security Cooperation Organization Responsibilities:

C10.19.4.1. Amend the IMS’s ITO to cancel all training, all authorizations including any dependents, and terminate DoD sponsorship.

C10.19.4.2. Notify Consular Section of U.S. Embassy that issued the IMS’s visa.

C10.19.4.3. Notify the MoD of the IMS’s country of origin.

C10.19.4.4. Submit an UA/AWOL progress message in SC-TMS after the last end date of the training track.

C10.19.5. Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Education and Training Responsibilities:

C10.19.5.1. Notify and forward the information in Table C10.T18., to DHS/ICE/CTLD, and other appropriate DoD and Department of State (State) offices.

C10.19.5.2. Notify the appropriate DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)) Country Portfolio Director (CPD) to forward to the Defense Attaché of the IMS’s country of origin, usually located in Washington, D.C.

C10.19.5.3. Participate in the working group consisting of State, DHS/ICE, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and USNORTHCOM J34 representatives, maintain a list with current status information for all IMSs.

C10.19.5.4. The DSCA (Office of Business Operations (OBO)) issues guidance when it is necessary to proceed under continuing resolution (CR) Authority.

C10.20.1. International Military Student Officer. Commanders of U.S. installations with International Military Students (IMSs) scheduled for training designate an International Military Student Officer (IMSO) for administrative support of IMS and the U.S. Field Studies Program (FSP).

C10.20.2. Uniforms and Personal Clothing. Uniforms or items of personal clothing, other than special items of training clothing or equipment (such as flying training gear when included in course cost) may not be provided on a grant basis. IMSs and/or countries may purchase such items under a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case funded with national funds.

C10.20.3. Visits to Canada and Mexico. IMSs attending instruction in the continental United States (CONUS) must coordinate with the IMSO to receive authorization to visit Canada and Mexico if the visit does not exceed 72 hours. IMSs must comply with all immigration and customs regulations. Such visits do not affect the living allowances. IMSs should be aware that they need multiple entry visas to visit Canada or Mexico and to return to the United States. Not all visas meet this criterion.

C10.20.4. Student and Dependent Employment.

C10.20.4.1. Dependents authorized to accompany an IMS may have privileges to seek employment in the United States pursuant to bilateral reciprocal work agreements the United States may have with their country as described in Title 8 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), paragraph 214.2. Bilateral reciprocal work agreements do not cover the student. The IMS is granted a visa for the official business of participating in training. Each IMS must direct all questions concerning employment for the IMS and the dependents directly to his or her respective Embassy.

C10.20.5. Disposition of Students in the Event of Emergency. In the event of a national emergency, DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) provides procedures and policy for the disposition of IMSs and authorized dependents in the United States and at U.S. installations abroad.

C10.20.6. Retainable Instructional Materials. The shipment cost of student Retainable Instructional Materials (RIM) may be included in the tuition rates for all formal courses. See DoD 7000.14-R, DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoD FMR) 7000.14-R, Volume 15, Chapter 7. IMSs sending their instructional materials via international mail, or sending instructional materials in excess of the total maximum allowance, do so at personal expense.

C10.20.6.1. Weight Allowances. The weight allowance for RIM is limited to 100 pounds for Professional Military Education (PME), postgraduate education, language instructor training, and 50 pounds for all other courses.

C10.20.6.2. Packaging and Labeling Requirements. Materials are packaged and labeled at the training installation and shipped to the country Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) address in the country or to the SCO official address for classified material, for delivery to the IMS. If approved by the SCO, the RIM may be shipped to the student directly as indicated on the Invitational Travel Order (ITO) via the most economical method available. State Pouch service is limited but may be used if available, in cases where there is no Army or Air Force Post Office (APO)/Fleet Post Office (FPO)/Diplomatic Post Office (DPO). A copy of the student’s ITO will be placed inside the package. Use of the APO/FPO/DPO address of the sponsoring SCO is authorized if available. Packages shipped via the SCO should be addressed to the SCO (student’s name must not be entered on address label) and include (on the side of the package) the Worksheet Control Number (WCN) and Program Year for an International Military Education and Training (IMET) IMS, and the WCN and FMS case for an FMS IMS.

C10.20.6.3. Shipment of Personal Property. The training installation IMSO ensures that no personal effects or other unauthorized matter is shipped with the instructional material.

C10.20.7. Maintenance of International Military Student Records. DoD schools that train IMSs under security cooperation (SC) programs must maintain IMS records for the same length of time as they are required to maintain records for other students. Country teams and/or SCOs retain IMS records for a minimum of ten years. Electronic filing is encouraged and authorized. See Section C10.8.5.7. for information regarding maintenance and destruction of IMS medical records.

C10.20.8. Country Liaison Officers. Use of foreign liaison personnel to assist U.S. training activities with student administration is authorized only after the Implementing Agency (IA) has acknowledged the need for assistance and can provide the logistics support. Country Liaison Officers (CLOs) are authorized only when a country is scheduled to train a large number of students or where student background warrants liaison personnel assistance. Programming procedures for liaison personnel Travel and Living Allowance (TLA) are the same as for the student, if funded under IMET. Liaison personnel are programmed under generic code N10. Liaison personnel are not authorized to pursue a course of instruction concurrent with liaison duties. An FMS case is required for non-IMET sponsored liaison personnel to cover associated support expenses (e.g., leased office space and phone). CLO support and duties will be identified and stated in an agreement between the unit and sponsoring country. Performance standards and expectations will be clearly stated and agreed with actionable options in response to low standards.

C10.20.8.1. Due to the need for CLO accountability, it is required that all CLOs report to the IMSOs for in/out processing in addition to notifying IMSOs of any departure from assigned duty location (i.e. leave, TDY, etc.) scheduled leave in-country. CLOs will adhere to the same administrative requirements as the IMS to ensure accountability.

C10.20.8.2. SCOs must ensure CLOs are briefed prior to departure. CLOs will adhere to any IMS administrative requirements to ensure accountability for their safety and welfare.

C10.20.9. Leave or Leave Extensions. Leave or leave extensions are granted to IMSs only when authorized in the original ITO, or if the SCO amends the ITO by written communication with the training installation. The written communication must be completed no later than 15 days prior to completion of scheduled training.

C10.20.10. Diplomas and Certificates of Training Completion vs. Qualification and Certification. DoD awards diplomas and issues certificates of training. A DoD-issued diploma or certificate of training is not the same as qualification credentialing or certification. DoD does not assess IMS fitness for non-DoD qualification credentials and cannot certify an IMS in any skill or function. There is no exception to this policy. The differences are defined and explained below.

C10.20.10.1. Diplomas and Certificates of Training. An IMS who satisfies the requirements of a DoD-sponsored training course or program may be given a DoD-issued diploma or certificate of training completion. The purpose of such DoD documents, which are usually signed by the training organization commander, is limited to acknowledging that the IMS satisfactorily performed the tasks taught in the training environment and met the minimum standards required to graduate.

C10.20.10.1.1. A diploma or certificate of training usually shows the course name and Identification (ID) number, the IMS name and rank or grade, and the inclusive dates of the training. A diploma or certificate of training may also indicate a comparative ranking within the class (e.g., Honor Graduate), or that the student exceeded minimum standards to a significant degree, but neither document is a U.S. or DoD qualification credential or certification, nor is intended to be a basis for issuance of such.

C10.20.10.1.2. Upon completion of some training, an IMS may be given a transcript with the diploma or certificate of training. A transcript only indicates how well the IMS performed during specific activities, classes, or courses, usually by means of an alphanumeric grade or a status indicator (e.g., P for pass, F for fail, I for incomplete). A transcript is not a U.S. or DoD qualification credential or certification, nor is intended to be a basis for issuance of such.

C10.20.10.1.3. DoD diplomas and certificates of training are not a commercial manufacturer's certification, credential, or official license to operate or maintain any piece of equipment or perform any task that requires such.

C10.20.10.2. Qualification Credentials and Certification. Most countries and organizations have established standards of performance a person must be able to demonstrate to be considered qualified for a license to operate or maintain certain kinds of equipment, or to perform complex, critical, or dangerous tasks, e.g., welding, auditing, or firefighting. Often, experience and demonstrated competence are documented in an official record like an apprentice log book, which is used to justify issuance of a license or official certification by an accrediting agency.

C10.20.10.2.1. An IMS who completes DoD-sponsored training may be qualified to perform a specific task or fill a specific position, but DoD does not guarantee or warrant an IMS's ability to satisfy any non-U.S. or non-DoD performance standards, nor to operate or maintain a piece of equipment owned or used by any other nation, and DoD never issues or acts as a guarantor of any IMS qualification credential, license, or certification.

C10.20.10.2.2. Only a partner nation designated authority may determine if a U.S. trained IMS is physically, professionally, or technically qualified to operate or maintain a piece of equipment owned or used by that partner nation, or to perform any job that requires an official license or certification.

C10.20.10.2.3. Upon request, as part of an FMS case, DoD may be able to provide technical advice or training to help a partner nation establish or improve a certification program.

C10.20.10.3. Department of Defense Contractor Provided Training. A DoD contractor may issue a certificate of training or course completion that indicates the contractor's recognition of a specific IMS qualification. DoD does not warrant or act as a guarantor of any contractor-issued license or certification. Only a partner nation designated authority may determine if a contractor-issued credential satisfies that partner nation's certification requirements to operate or maintain a piece of equipment owned or used by that partner nation.

C10.21.1. Positions of Prominence Report. Each Combatant Command (CCMD) ensures that Security Cooperation Organizations (SCOs) update Positions of Prominence Report (PPR) data annually in the Combined Education and Training Program Plan (CETPP) prior to the CCMD Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group (SCETWG). The DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) extracts PPR information from the CETPPs. The data is used to assess the effectiveness of the programs and support subsequent alumni engagement activities.

C10.21.1.1. Description of Military Ranks for Reporting Purposes. For purposes of this report, prominent military positions include all General and Flag Officers and lesser ranks when associated with positions such as chief of a military service, senior cabinet aide, senior position on the joint or general staff, commander of a training installation which would be held by a General or Flag Officer in the United States, Military Attaché to a major world capital, or commanders of elite or singular units with special tasks such as guarding the nation’s capital.

C10.21.1.2. Description of Civilian Ranks for Reporting Purposes. Civilian graduates under security cooperation (SC) training programs achieving positions of prominence include heads of state (including royalty), cabinet and deputy cabinet ministers, ambassadors, members of parliament, chiefs of leading business enterprises, and other leaders of the civilian community. Because of the rank structures used around the world, SCOs must use best judgment in assigning a U.S. equivalent grade.

C10.21.1.3. Data Format. Data is composed of updates on individuals previously reported if his or her position or status has changed, and former students who have achieved positions of prominence since the last report. Data should be formatted as specified in the CETPP, to include country; name (last, first, middle initial); grade; U.S. equivalent grade; prominent positions held (to include all previous positions of prominence); current position; academic degree (if appropriate); specific training completed (course, place of training, rank, year(s) attended, and source of funding); and how the position was obtained (election, appointment, or other).

C10.21.2. Foreign Military Training Report. The Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), section 656 (22 U.S.C. 2416) and the annual Foreign Operations Appropriations Act require the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State to jointly prepare and submit the Foreign Military Training Report (FMTR) to the appropriate Congressional committees a report on all military training provided to foreign military personnel by the DoD, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Department of State (State) during the previous fiscal year (FY) and all such training proposed for the current FY. For the purpose of this report, “training” is defined as any activity where a significant objective is the transfer of knowledge or skills (related to the performance of tasks of a military or defense nature) to units or individuals of the foreign armed forces or foreign Ministry of Defense (MoD) civilians. This definition includes only education and training events. It does not include military exercises. The timeline (See Table C10.T19.), ensures this report is compiled and submitted to Congress to meet the legislated deadline.

Table C10.T19. Foreign Military Training Report Preparation Timeline

Date*

Action

August

End

DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) issues the annual FMTR Data Call tasking message to all training activities, Military Departments (MILDEPs), CCMDs, The Joint Staff, and SCOs, outlining detailed reporting procedures and administrative guidance for the report.

This message includes the non-security assistance (Non-SA) Microsoft Excel workbook used to report training information not managed in in the Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS).

September

Start

Upon receipt of the tasking message, the CCMDs and MILDEPs will provide their training data provider points of contact (POCs) to DSCA.

Within SC-TMS, SCOs complete all data inputs/updates for geographic CCMD review.

CCMDs and MILDEPs begin their training data compliance review in SC-TMS correcting any errors and providing any missing information.

Non-SA Data providers compile and prepare their programs submissions in the Microsoft Excel Non-SA workbook and coordinate with their DoD sponsors for review.

End

End of the fiscal year training data compliance review in SC-TMS must be complete and the fiscal year dataset is finalized.

October

Start

The finalized fiscal year dataset is downloaded from SC-TMS and imported into the FMTR data system.

Initial data validation procedures begin.

Mid

DSCA compiles data received from SC-TMS with reported Non-SA Data sheets.

Data validation checks are performed and DSCA works directly with non-SA data providers to correct errors.

DSCA finalizes updates to the body of the report, including the listing of training programs and report package.

End

DSCA prepares draft FMTR for internal review.

November

Start

DSCA prepares the final FMTR draft for internal/external organizations’ coordination.

Mid

DSCA begins internal/external coordination with DSCA Directorates, DoD General Council (DoD GC), DoD Legislative Affairs (DoD LA), Joint Staff, OSD Regional offices.

A copy is forwarded to State.

End

DSCA completes resolution and consolidation of comments from the internal/external coordination.

December

Start

DSCA prepares the final “Signature Report” and completes any updates to the DoD staffing package.

Mid

Report is forwarded to the DSCA’s Front Office for approval and Director’s signature.

The signed report is forwarded to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) for approval and signature.

End

Upon receipt of USD(P) approval, DSCA forwards the signed report to State - Under Secretary of State For Political Affairs.

January

Start

State begins their internal coordination process.

Mid

DSCA works with State to finalize any report related issues.

State finalizes their report edits.

End

State prepares printed copies of the report for delivery to Congress.

* Note: Dates may vary depending on the work week each year

C10.21.3. Training Analysis Code Assignment. Table C10.T2. shows the training analysis codes (TACs) and their definitions. This table also shows the standardized Worksheet Control Number (WCN) assignment, based on the training analysis code of the training line that is assigned to each International Military Education and Training (IMET) training sequence (i.e., training programmed for the same International Military Student (IMS)). Training analysis codes are assigned to each training line (Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL)) by the MILDEPs and are used by State, CCMDs, and DSCA to analyze a country’s training program, a specific CCMD, or the entire IMET program. The composition of a country’s IMET program should clearly demonstrate a linkage to country and U.S. policy considerations.

C10.21.4. Monitoring Use of International Military Educations and Training Graduates. SCOs monitor use of U.S.-trained personnel, with emphasis on the more critical and higher-level skills through the Annual Training Report process. Annual updates to the IMS information in Appendix D of the CETPP by the appropriate host nation authorities satisfy this requirement.

C10.22.1. Definition and Purpose. Security Cooperation Education and Training (SCET) teams consist of U.S. Military, DoD civilian, and/or contractor personnel deployed to a foreign country on temporary duty (TDY) (179 days or less), or Permanent Change of Station (PCS) (more than 179 days) status. These teams provide advice, training, technical assistance, or support to personnel of the host nation. This assistance is provided to meet specific objectives in connection with the development of a country’s capabilities. Prior to programming these teams, planners should take into consideration all of the advantages and disadvantages inherent in the use of this type of assistance in a particular country. Deployment of SCET teams should also be consistent with goals and objectives outlined in both Combatant Command (CCMD) campaign plans and the State Department Integrated Country Strategies. Table C10.T1., provides a listing of the various authorities for education and training.

C10.22.1.1. Constraints. Teams that deploy and function under authority of the relevant section of either Title 10 U.S.C., Title 22 U.S.C. or other relevant legislation are subject to procedures and constraints included in the authorizing legislation and/or established policy. Procedures and constraints vary greatly from one legislative authority to another, and all stakeholders concerned with a particular team’s deployment must fully understand those differences. See Section C10.22.5.2. ”Security Screening for Security Cooperation Educations and Training Teams/Mobile Educations Teams and Mobile Training Teams.”

C10.22.1.2. Before a team deploys under Title 10 U.S.C. authorities, the Security Cooperation Organization (SCO) will ensure the team understands any rules of engagement or other constraints applicable to the particular section of the law that authorizes the deployment. The SCO will refer any questions to the Combatant Commander’s (CCDR) Staff Judge Advocate for resolution prior to the team’s deployment.

C10.22.1.3. Teams deploying under security assistance (SA) authorities, Title 22 U.S.C., will not engage in, or provide assistance or advice, to foreign forces in a combat situation. Additionally, such teams must not perform operational duties of any kind except as may be required in the conduct of On-the-Job Training (OJT) in the operation and maintenance of equipment, weapons, or supporting systems. Teams deploying under SA authorities must not perform SCO functions or augment the SCO or U.S. forces in country. Teams will not serve as an integral part of the Armed Forces of the hosting nation.

C10.22.1.4. All members of SCET teams must understand their responsibilities concerning acts of misconduct by partner nation personnel. The Military Department (MILDEP) responsible for SCET organization and management will brief team members prior to deployment on what to do if they encounter or observe such acts.

C10.22.1.5. The provisions listed in the above paragraph represent a level of conduct the United States expects each partner nation to observe. If team members encounter prohibited acts, they will disengage from the activity, leave the area if possible, and report the incidents immediately to the SCO, who will notify the Chief of the U.S. Mission. The Chief of the U.S. Diplomatic Mission through the SCO will identify proper U.S. authorities during the team’s initial briefing. Team members will not discuss such matters with non-USG authorities such as journalists or civilian contractors.

C10.22.1.6. SCOs will initiate SCET requests using the DD Form 2964 Security Cooperation Education and Training (SCET) Team Request, submitted through the CCMD to the MILDEP Implementing Agency (IA). A fillable Portable Document Format (PDF) of the SCET Team Request (DD Form 2964) is located on the Security Assistance Network Web (SANweb) in Security Cooperation Training Management System (SC-TMS)/FORMS.

C10.22.2. Types of Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams.

C10.22.2.1. Extended Training Service Specialist. Extended Training Service Specialists (ETSSs) are DoD military and/or civilian personnel normally deployed in a PCS status and who are technically qualified to provide defense related advice and instruction, or training in the installation, operation, and maintenance of weapons, equipment, and systems. ETSSs are attached to the SCO for operational oversight and administrative and logistical support, but do not perform SCO staff duties. ETSSs are not used for follow-on retraining or advisory duties, except in rare instances when the recipient country cannot provide qualified personnel from its own resources or hire qualified personnel from non-indigenous sources.

C10.22.2.1.1. ETSSs deploy under SA authorities contained in Title 22 U.S.C. and are programmed under budget generic code N30 on the basis of person-month requirements. ETSSs are most often programmed under a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case. Because of funding severability issues, ETSSs are not normally programmed for either the International Military Education and Training (IMET) or the Regional Defense Fellowship Program (RDFP), DSCA (Office of International Operations (IOPS)) DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) and DSCA (Office of Strategy, Plans, and Policy (SPP)) must approve ETSS deployment under either of these programs. The case manager and SCO should ensure the FMS case contains appropriate language to support ETSS deployment. All costs involved in deploying and sustaining the ETSS must be included in the Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA). Depending on the country, this can include such items as dependent travel, movement of household goods, and dependent schooling.

C10.22.2.1.2. ETSSs that are English language instructors, supervisors, or advisors on detached duty status from Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC) are referred to as a Language Training Detachment (LTD).

C10.22.2.1.3. ETSSs may be provided for periods up to one year under IMET. Only DSCA (IOPS), DSCA (DSCU/IMTE), and DSCA (SPP) can approve longer periods.

C10.22.3. Contract Field Services. Contract Field Services (CFS) are civilian personnel under contract from private industry who perform the same functions as ETSSs. CFS personnel are used only when the IA determines that services by DoD personnel are not practical. Only DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) can approve use of CFS personnel under IMET. CFS requirements are programmed on the basis of person-month requirements. Estimated contract cost covers the total training service cost, including salary, transportation, baggage, etc. Budget generic code N30 funds CFS personnel.

C10.22.3.1. CFS costs depend on the value of a negotiated contract with the civilian firm involved and include such costs as salary, in-country maintenance, continental United States (CONUS) travel, and overhead.

C10.22.3.2. The SCO is responsible for ensuring the contractor understands regulations and procedures for receipt, dispatch, storing, and safeguarding of military information, including classified information.

C10.22.3.3. CFS contracts are non-personal services contract. U.S. officers and employees should have no supervisory control over contractor personnel. Non-personal services contract means a contract under which the personnel rendering the services are not subject, either by the contract’s terms or by the manner of its administration, to the supervision and control usually prevailing in relationships between the Government and its employees.

C10.22.3.4. Contractors and their employees will not be placed in policy-making positions or in positions of command, supervision, administration, or control over DoD personnel or personnel of other contractors; nor will they become part of a foreign government organization.

C10.22.3.5. Security clearance for employees of contractors performing field services will conform to the requirements of applicable DoD instructions or regulations. Other administrative requirements such as those involving certificates of performance, logistical support, travel, identification, privileges, and reports will conform to the appropriate provisions of the MILDEP regulation, as incorporated within the contract for the services.

C10.22.3.6. According to the terms of the contract, the contracting officer may require the contractor to remove from the job site any CFS employee who endangers persons or property or whose continued employment under the contract is inconsistent with the interests of the USG.

C10.22.3.7. CFS personnel are authorized leave for U.S. federal holidays as specified in MILDEP procurement procedures. All other leave and absence are authorized at the discretion of the contractor.

C10.22.4. Technical Assistance Field Teams. Technical Assistance Field Teams (TAFTs) are DoD and/or contractor personnel deployed in a PCS status for the purpose of providing in-country technical, advisory, or maintenance support to foreign personnel on specific equipment, technology, weapons, and supporting systems when Mobile Training Teams (MTTs) and ETSSs are not appropriate for the purpose (e.g., Technical Assistance Team (TAT) deployed in a TDY status). Any training a TAFT provides is collateral to their technical and maintenance support function. TAFTs cannot be provided under IMET.

C10.22.5. Mobile Training Teams and/or Mobile Education Teams. MTTs are DoD and/or contract personnel on TDY (up to 179 days) for the purpose of training foreign personnel in the operation, maintenance, or support of weapon systems and support equipment, or for specific training requirements that are beyond in-country U.S. resources. Requirements for assistance in excess of 179 days should be met by CONUS training or be provided as an ETSS.

C10.22.5.1. MTTs deploy under Title 10 U.S.C., Title 22 U.S.C., or other statutory authorities. METs provide training developed primarily in response to the Expanded IMET (E-IMET) program in a seminar and/or educational format.

C10.22.5.1.1. MTTs may be authorized for either CONUS or outside of the continental United States (OCONUS) deployment. This includes in-country training surveys to determine specific country training needs; to identify quantity requirements that are beyond the country’s capability to assess and that are associated with equipment deliveries; and to provide assistance for self-defense.

C10.22.5.1.2. MTTs should be considered when training must be accomplished quickly in response to a threat or adverse condition affecting the security of the foreign country; training is of relatively short duration; training must reach a large number of trainees; or when training can be conducted only on equipment or in facilities located in the foreign country.

C10.22.5.2. Security Screening for Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams/Mobile Education Teams, and Mobile Training Teams. Local security screening and Leahy vetting for gross violations of human rights is required for the specific foreign units, including foreign unit commanders attending a U.S. funded SCET/MTT/MET focused on a specific unit(s). When U.S.-funded training is not intended for a specific unit but provided to an ad hoc assembly of individual participants from a variety of different units, accomplish the security screening described in Section C10.8.3. for each individual International Military Student (IMS). For an MTT/MET funded with FMS national funds, the security screening uses the standard local screening process developed by the country team with the Ambassador's approval. Leahy vetting is not required for IMSs whose SCET/MTT/MET training is funded with national funds.

C10.22.5.2.1. The MILDEP will establish the training line with an appropriate Team track type (i.e. Team) and Training track type (i.e., IMS or Team) noted to permit SCO to enter IMS data for screening requirements. Upon completion of the security screening, the MILDEP will ensure that the Training Military Articles and Services List (T-MASL) identified for the MTT has been reviewed, is up to date and contains all required IMS information.

C10.22.5.2.2. The MILDEP will ensure that the number of IMSs expected to participate in training is entered (instead of “1”). This provides the ability to compare the quantity of IMSs expected on the training line with the number of names entered to determine if the MTT was attended and resourced correctly. IMS information should be entered into SC-TMS prior to commencing SCET/MTT/MET training conducted by DoD.

C10.22.5.2.3. The MTT team lead or team chief will coordinate directly with the SCO to verify the list of IMSs approved to participate in the training and confirm that all IMSs have completed security screening requirements before training commences. The MTT team-lead or team-chief will also alert the SCO of any inconsistencies and provide any necessary edits/updates of IMS data to the SCO. The SCO will update the IMS individual identification data in the SC-TMS within 15 days after the completion of training. This applies to all IMS attending DoD provided MTTs, including CONUS and OCONUS, resident and non-resident training.

C10.22.5.3. General Mobile Training Team/Mobile Education Team Programming and Funding Information. The MILDEPs will ensure that each MTT is programmed using a T-MASL line appropriately tailored for the training requested, and that there is a separate line on the Standard Training List (STL) created for adding IMS names. MTTs will NOT use generic or “other” T-MASLs. MTT Instructors will coordinate with the SCO to ensure that all IMSs are properly vetted and their names are entered into SC-TMS before training commences.

C10.22.5.3.1. Programming must include duration in weeks; number of team members; costs for overseas travel (round trip); in-country travel; travel and living allowances; CONUS travel; baggage; and DoD civilian salaries. Only the MILDEP can approve excess baggage.

C10.22.5.3.2. Per diem allowance costs during TDY travel outside CONUS is computed according to Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) rates for U.S. military personnel, and rates shown in the "Standard Regulations, Government Civilians, Foreign Areas" (published by the Department of State (State)) for USG civilians. MTTs’ CONUS travel costs are programmed at an estimated rate to include commercial air transportation, baggage, and per diem.

C10.22.5.3.3. Costs of team members traveling from overseas locations are computed using commercial air (tourist rate) transportation, per diem, and excess baggage. Additional travel costs should be based on the JTR and other applicable directives and regulations.

C10.22.5.3.4. When more than one MILDEP is involved, a joint MTT is programmed using the T-MASL line of the MILDEP providing the most team members. If each MILDEP provides an equal number of team members, the MTT is programmed using the T-MASL line of the MILDEP counterpart to the requesting foreign country MILDEP.

C10.22.5.3.5. All team member costs, including pre-deployment orientation or training costs are programmed as "unit costs" of the country program.

C10.22.5.3.6. Training aids (including packing, crating, handling, and transportation (PCH&T)) are programmed separately under budget generic code N20, description: MTT-TRNG AIDS (MASL Item-ID 309000-CONUS, 319000-O and/or S). This program line shows the next sequential suffix of the Worksheet Control Number (WCN). Only training aids that cannot be requisitioned under FMS are included under this procedure and must be approved by DSCA (IOPS) and DSCA (DSCU/IMTE).

C10.22.5.3.7. Light refreshments during breaks in MTT/MET-provided training may be funded if the provision of such refreshments prevents disruption of the training agenda. The MTT/MET must be a formal DoD conference with a published and substantive agenda, which includes scheduled speakers, and involves matters of topical interest to participants from multiple agencies and/or foreign governmental participants, where refreshments are incidental to the overall conference. The SCO must provide the DSCA (Office of Business Operations (OBO)) adequate documentation explaining that no other convenient source of refreshments for attendees exists. This documentation must be provided to the DSCA (OBO)at least 45 days prior to the start of training.

C10.22.5.4. Mobile Training Teams Funded with Foreign Military Sales.

C10.22.5.4.1. An MTT may be furnished under an LOA, either as a separate case or as part of an existing training case. MTTs provided through an FMS LOA may cross fiscal years (FYs). The MILDEPs develop cost data for these MTTs. The same cost elements as stated for IMET MTTs are used, with the addition of military pay and allowances with current acceleration factors for all military members of FMS-funded MTTs.

C10.22.5.4.2. When planning for MTTs, the SCO should allow adequate time for:

  • Determination of price and availability;
  • LOA preparation and processing;
  • Submission to and acceptance by the country;
  • Receipt of the initial deposit and issuance of obligation or expenditure authority;
  • And, MTT team orientation and preparation of training aids after funding is received.

C10.22.5.5. Mobile Training Teams funded with International Military Education and Training Funds.

C10.22.5.5.1. A fundamental objective of IMET is to influence current and future senior leaders among foreign military personnel by exposing them, during training in the United States, to the American people, way of life, institutions, beliefs, and aspirations. This must be considered when proposing an MTT OCONUS deployment in lieu of CONUS training. A decision to use MTTs should not be solely based on cost considerations. Every attempt should be made to provide MTTs through FMS rather than IMET. MTT requests under IMET must demonstrate that an MTT is the best approach and that IMET is the only available funding option. A DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) waiver is required to program an MTT under IMET.

C10.22.5.5.2. MTTs are programmed by the SCO for the FY in which the team will be used. Teams are programmed on a man-week basis. An IMET funded MTT cannot be funded across FYs; therefore, personnel on MTT duty must terminate their TDY and return to home station before September 30 unless action has been taken to reprogram the team in the new FY. Such reprogramming is subject to the 179-day restriction on MTTs, receipt of Continuing Resolution Authority (CRA) or other budget authority in the new FY, and DSCA approval. Consider also that there are some authorities that allow funding across FY as discussed in Appendix 8.

C10.22.5.5.3. Transportation costs for round trip team travel are chargeable to the FY of the start of the TDY. Once a formal MTT request is submitted according to MILDEP instructions and the details of mission, concept, composition, duration, and source agency finalized, the IMET will be adjusted to reflect the MTT cost estimate developed by the appropriate MILDEP. The following factors will be included: CONUS travel and team orientation programmed per-member to include CONUS airfare, per diem, and baggage; transoceanic travel (round trip) using current commercial airfare rates; travel and per diem allowances according to the JTR; in-country travel costs; and cost of team members. For civilians, this cost is calculated from the base salary rate plus acceleration factor as prescribed by current DoD pricing instructions. No salary costs are included for military members. All team member costs, including pre-deployment orientation or training cost, are programmed as "unit costs" of the country program.

C10.22.5.5.4. An MTT cannot be deployed under IMET until funds are available; therefore, a SCO must consider lead times when requesting and programming an MTT.

C10.22.5.5.5. For costing purposes, MTTs are subject to IMET incremental pricing policy.

C10.22.5.6. Mobile Training Teams funded from Non-International Military Education and Training Sources.

C10.22.5.6.1. An MTT may be funded by the RDFP only after receipt of Office of the Secretary of Defense Special Operations/Low Intensity Conflict (OSD(SO/LIC)) and CCMD approval. RDFP-funded MTTs use the same cost programming and cost elements as IMET-funded MTTs.

C10.22.5.6.2. MTT Training programs, as defined in Section C10.1., must be associated with a T-MASL and appropriate suffix lines must be built to capture costs for Salary, Per Diem, Training Aids, in country costs, etc. An MTT provided under the RDFP program or the Section 333 Authority will use the same cost programming and cost elements as an IMET-funded MTT.

C10.22.5.7. Technical Assistance Teams. Similar to TAFTs, TATs provide SA services, not SA training. TATs are DoD and/or contractor personnel deployed to place into operation, maintain, or repair equipment that was provided under SA programs. Any training a TAT provides is collateral to its primary mission of placing into operation, maintaining, or repairing equipment sold or provided to the host nation. TAT services can be provided under an FMS case but cannot be provided under IMET, except in the case of the installation of English language laboratories. TAT personnel deploy in TDY status unlike TAFT personnel who deploy in PCS status.

C10.22.5.8. Requirement Survey Team. Requirement Survey Teams (RSTs) deploy to help the SCO develop and define equipment, training and technical assistance requirements for the host nation. The Funding source depends upon the nature of the mission and could include, but is not limited to, FMS cases and IMET. An Expeditionary Requirements Generation Teams (ERGT) is a type of RST organized and deployed by DSCA. See Section C2.4.2., for more information on ERGT.

C10.22.5.9. Pre-Deployment Site Survey. An RST team chief may deploy alone or with other personnel as an advance party to ensure preparations for the main body are in place. As with RSTs, funding sources for a pre-deployment site survey (PDSS) will depend upon the nature of the mission and could include, but are not limited to, FMS and IMET cases.

C10.22.6. Other Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams and Outside the Continental United States Activities Under Title 10 United States Code. Teams or personnel deployed under various authorities, such as Combatant Commander Initiatives Fund (CCIF) (10 U.S.C. 166a) or Training with Friendly Foreign Forces (10 U.S.C. 322) are programmed as a part of the development of a CCDR Theater Security Cooperation Plan (TSCP). Unlike those teams programmed under SA procedures, IMET and FMS, Title 10 SCET deployments are typically tasked by the CCDR directly to a MILDEP component command. Funding is provided by the tasking CCDR to the Service component providing the team. Teams composed of Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel require U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) approval. The Service component command follows its proscribed internal procedures for filling CCMD tasking, ensuring training is associated with a T-MASL (See Section C10.22.5.6.2.).

C10.22.6.1. Combatant Commander Initiatives Fund. CCIF, authorized under 10 U.S.C. 166a, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) may provide funds to CCDRs to deploy personnel in a TDY status to foreign countries to provide military education and training to military and related civilian personnel of that country. Beyond provision of SCET teams, these funds may also be utilized for force training, contingencies, selected operations, command and control, joint exercises (including activities of participating foreign countries), humanitarian and civil assistance, personnel expenses of foreign country defense personnel participation in bilateral or regional cooperation programs, and force protection.

C10.22.6.2. Military-to-Military Contacts and Comparable Activities. Under authority of Traditional Commanders’ Activities (TCAs) the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) may direct military-to-military contacts and comparable activities designed to encourage a democratic orientation of defense establishments and military forces of other countries. SECDEF may provide funds to the CCDRs, which may be used for the activities of traveling contract teams, military liaison teams, exchanges of civilian or military personnel between DoD and defense ministries of foreign governments, exchanges of military personnel between units of the armed forces and units of foreign armed forces, seminars and conferences held primarily in a theater of operations, and distribution of publications primarily in a theater of operations. Except for the activities specifically authorized by this section, funds provided may not be used for the provision of any other defense articles or services, including training, to any foreign country.

C10.22.7. Coordination and Programming of Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams.

C10.22.7.1. Whenever possible, the SCO should forecast requirements for SCET multiple years in advance of the expected deployment date. The SCO’s plans for SCET should be included in the CCMD out-year theater security cooperation (SC) planning where they are ultimately integrated and synchronized with other SC activities in support of a larger strategic objective.

C10.22.7.2. The SCO should also capture SCET requirements in the SCO Combined Education and Training Program Plan (CETPP). The CETPP includes all SCO training requirements for a three-year period (current year, budgeting year (current+1), and planning year (current+2)).

C10.22.7.3. Finally, the SCO submits SCET requests at annual Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Groups (SCETWGs). Requests not identified as part of the CETPP and submitted at a SCETWG are considered "out-of-cycle". Although an out-of-cycle request does not necessarily prevent a SCET from being sourced, the various DoD organizations that resource SCET may have fewer resourcing options to support late-developing requirements.

C10.22.7.4. To obtain SCET team support, the SCO should initiate coordination with the appropriate MILDEP or Service training organization as soon as an OCONUS training requirement is identified. Formal requests for SCET teams funded by FMS, IMET, RDFP, and Section 333 are submitted via DD Form 2964. A fillable PDF of the SCET Team Request (DD Form 2964) is located on the SANweb in SC-TMS/FORMS.

C10.22.7.4.1. All SCET teams must comply with DoD , CCMD, and MILDEP airworthiness policies outlined in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5030.61, DoD Airworthiness Policy.

C10.22.7.4.2. SCOs should reflect airworthiness policy requirements and compliance in applicable SCET Team requests (DD Form 2964s). DD Form 2964s not addressing airworthiness will be returned to CCMDs and SCOs for appropriate clarification and action (in order to ensure required actions before approving sourcing of U.S. Air Force support).

C10.22.7.5. SCETs sourced by U.S. SOF must be endorsed by the theater Special Operations Component Command (Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC), Special Operations Command Central (SOCCENT), Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR), Special Operations Command South (SOCSOUTH), or Special Operations Command Africa (SOCAF)), and approved by the USSOCOM.

C10.22.7.6. Coordination with the Host Nation. In many cases, the relative cost and level of difficulty in preparing for a SCET is significantly higher for the partner nation than for the United States. Some examples of the difficulties that the partner nation must address and mitigate include; limited budgets, manning, number of personnel with English language capability, logistics; finite ground and/or air transportation assets to transport IMSs; complex approval procedures; and ongoing combat operations. Early and continuous coordination with the partner nation can help ensure SCET team mission success.

C10.22.7.6.1. The SCO must work with representatives from the Embassy team and partner nation to define the SCET/MTT/MET team mission and ensure the host nation military understands, in detail, the requirements for team/cadre members and students, including:

  • IMS screening timelines and personal data requirements, including: name, military rank and prerequisite skills and English Comprehension Level (ECL);
  • Training equipment requirements; by type and number;
  • Types of training facilities required;
  • Transportation and communications requirements;
  • Safety equipment, medical care/evacuation requirements, and;
  • Other SCET team support arrangements.

C10.22.7.7. Mobile Training Team/Mobile Education Team Requirements Definition. Requirements for SCETs resourced from State grant funded programs, e.g. IMET or Foreign Military Financing (FMF), and DoD grant funded programs, e.g. Section 333 must be captured in the CCMD proposal document and accurately reflected within DSAMS. In order to ensure that the IMS data is available for the mandatory reporting requirements, the training must be listed on a separate line, by T-MASL during case development. The training must be assigned a Team Training Track/Pipeline within DSAMS permitting the SCO (or MILDEP manager) to enter the names of the IMSs.

C10.22.8. Selection of Personnel. MILDEPs, commands, and agencies providing personnel for assignment to a SCET team should ensure that those personnel have the experience, technical ability, maturity, and personality to accomplish their duties in a manner that is in the best interest of the United States.

C10.22.8.1. The SCO requesting a SCET team will identify the expertise and qualifications that the team members should possess. Any special requirements, considerations, or restrictions should also be identified.

C10.22.8.2. Team members must be medically fit to perform duty with a SCET team in the designated country. Physical disorders that may require medical attention or hospitalization may disqualify a candidate. Medical expenses incurred for non-military team members will be charged to the program supporting the team.

C10.22.8.3. Personnel selected for SCET must have enough time remaining in the MILDEP before separation or retirement to complete the required period of deployment.

C10.22.9. Quality of Life and Mission Sustainment Items for Security Cooperation Education and Training Teams. Quality of Life (QOL) items are any articles or services that, in the judgment of the SCO Chief and CCDR, have a positive effect on the living and and/or or working environment of the deployed SCET Team. Mission Sustainment (MS) items are those articles and services that are essential for the successful accomplishment of the team's mission. Factors to be considered in determining specific QOL and/or MS item requirements should include availability of suitable entertainment, climate and/or geography, security, local language, and recreational facilities.

C10.22.9.1. Examples of Quality of Life Items. Examples of QOL items include, but are not limited to magazines, athletic equipment, fishing equipment, camping equipment, scuba gear, equipment repair, etc. Not included are charges for consumables, memberships, lessons, etc. Additionally, personal entertainment equipment, such as TVs, DVD players, or stereos, should only be provided for use in dayroom-type situations when justified by unusual circumstances or when individual team members cannot reasonably be expected to bring or acquire their own (e.g., extreme isolation or harsh environmental conditions, and limitations on baggage and/or personal belongings that members may bring). High cost QOL items over $500 must be approved by the CCDR and justified in the budget submission. Due to storage and repair problems, it may be more economical to rent and/or lease authorized high-cost equipment on an occasional basis to reduce the costs involved.

C10.22.9.2. Examples of Mission Sustainment Items. Examples of MS items include, but are not limited to housing, dependent education, medical support, security guards, drivers, physical conditioning equipment (e.g., aerobic equipment, weight-lifting equipment), transformers, and environmental and morale leave. Not included are charges for consumables, memberships, lessons, etc.

C10.22.9.3. The SCO Chief is the ultimate authority in-country for approving expenditures for these items within published guidance and LOA limitations.

C10.22.9.4. Funding for Quality of Life and/or Mission Sustainment Items. QOL items for SA-funded teams are provided to the team by the parent MILDEP and not from either Title 10 or Title 22 program funds provided to the SCO. If MILDEP funds are inadequate to meet QOL requirements for FMF-funded FMS SCET teams, then the FMF-funded FMS case funds may be used if specifically authorized in the LOA. QOL items cannot be funded under IMET but may be provided to IMET-funded teams from in-country SCET team stocks or parent MILDEP. MS items identified by the SCO can be purchased in-country using case funds if specifically authorized in the LOA. QOL items will not be authorized under Section 333/SC Account funded programs.

C10.22.9.5. Disposition of Quality of Life and/or Mission Sustainment Items. Prior to departure from country, the SCO and SCET team chief conduct a physical inventory of QOL and MS property. The MILDEP determines disposition of QOL items furnished by the MILDEP. The SCO determines disposition of QOL items purchased with case funds. The SCO chief is the ultimate authority in-country for disposition of MS items within published guidance and LOA limitations. For continuing SCET team missions, the team chief assigns the property to the follow-on team chief or temporarily to the SCO. When the SCET team mission is complete, the property is transferred to an authorized representative of the host nation or returned to the MILDEP as appropriate. Items purchased with case funds ultimately become the property of the host nation and the SCO assigns the property to an authorized representative of the host nation.

C10.22.10. Security Assistance Team Command Relationships. The Chief of the U.S. Diplomatic Mission exercises general supervision over the in-country operations and activities of SCETs through the SCO Chief. The CCDR provides necessary technical assistance and administrative support to SCOs to facilitate the efficient and effective oversight of SCETs activities, including QOL for personnel. The level of support provided to team members under an FMS case must not exceed the level authorized for in-country DoD personnel of equivalent grade who are funded by U.S. appropriations or FMS. Oversight of SCETs by CCDR through SCOs must not usurp MILDEP authority in issues of case management, contract administration, or the technical execution of the SAT mission as described in the individual terms of reference (i.e., LOA).

C10.22.11. Security Cooperation Organization Chief. The SCO Chief exercises administrative control over in-country SCET teams and is responsible for coordinating the team's activities to ensure compatibility with other DoD elements in or directly related to the U.S. diplomatic mission. The SCO Chief ensures compliance with CCMD directives and keeps the CCDR informed of SCET team activities and progress.

C10.22.12. SCO support responsibilities include, but are not limited to, those shown in Table C10.T20.

Table C10.T20. Security Cooperation Organization Functions in Support of Security Cooperation and Education Training Teams

#

Security Cooperation Organization Functions in Support Of Security Cooperation and Education Training Teams (Not Inclusive)

1

Forecast SCET requirements and include these requirements in CCMD out-year Theater Security Cooperation (TSC) planning and SCO CETPP.

2

Submit formal SCET team requests, using format provided in Section C10.22.1.6., at the annual SCETWG. Submit out-of-cycle SCET team requests to the appropriate MILDEP w/copies to other stakeholders.

3

Conduct coordination with the host nation and the appropriate MILDEP or training organization to identify, validate, and refine training and training support requirements.

4

Assist the MILDEP in identifying country and/or case unique management and administrative duties in the implementing program directive.

5

Ensure necessary equipment, instruction, facilities, and technical publications are available before or upon SCET team arrival in country.

6

Ensure foreign personnel to be trained meet the prerequisites necessary to comprehend the technical level of the training to be provided and the names are entered into SANweb/SC-TMS prior to training commencing.

7

Support compliance with applicable DoD, CCMD, and MILDEP airworthiness policies for any DoD personnel required to fly on partner nation military aircraft. Support includes interaction with partner nation officials to allow and support appropriate DoD qualified personnel to conduct airworthiness compliance actions (e.g. Military Airworthiness Authority level assessments or unit airworthiness specific operational checklist assessments) as well as any required partner nation funding (as/if applicable).

8

Exercise operational and administrative oversight over the in-country SCET team and ensure the team’s activities are consistent with the CCMD TSC and Embassy Mission Strategic Plan (MSP).

9

Review residential leases to ensure quarters are appropriate for rank and dependent status of team members and comply with DoD and State standards. The SCO ensures each lease request is submitted to the Embassy Interagency Housing Board, if required, for approval prior to signature by the appropriate contracting officer. If higher headquarters approval is required, ensure Embassy Interagency Housing Board reviews request before forwarding lease to the IA case manager.

10

Establish procedures to review all team TDYs and approve requests for out-of-country travel.

11

Review SCET team chief's request for annual funding prior to submission to the IA team manager.

12

Review SCET team request for purchase of QOL and/or MS items and items required to execute the team training and/or technical assistance mission. The SCO provides the MILDEP and the CCDR and/or designated Regional Component Command with an itemized listing of recommended QOL and MS articles to be included in the LOA. SCOs ensure the requested items are authorized in the LOA under which the team operates and that vendor discussions and actual purchases are made through a USG contracting office.

13

Ensure team chief establishes supply and/or equipment accountability records that provide a complete audit trail from item acquisition to disposal. All non-expendable, durable property costing $50.00 or more is recorded on a property record.

14

Review team property and inventory records for accuracy. Ensure continuous in-country accountability is maintained by conducting a physical inventory prior to team and/or team chief departure from country. As a minimum, physical inventories for PCS teams are conducted annually.

15

Perform periodic reviews of team petty cash funds to ensure funds are adequately protected and cash management is in accordance with Embassy budget and fiscal office procedures.

16

Assist SCET team chief with establishing procedures with the Embassy for payroll support of any foreign service employees hired to support the SCET team.

17

Prior to SCET team/team chief departure from country, conduct an After Action Review (AAR) and, with the team chief, provide inputs into the CCMD Theater Security Cooperation Information Management System (TSCMIS).

18

Ensure the SCET team chief provides formal after-action report within 30 days of completion of the team’s mission using format provided in JSCET (AR 12-15/SECNAVINST 4950.4B/AFI 16-105).

C10.22.13. Security Cooperation Education and Training Team Chief. The SCET team chief is the senior team member and assigns duties and responsibilities to team personnel. The SCET team chief is under the administrative control of the SCO while in-country and is an integral part of the SCO in support of the overall SC mission. The team chief is responsible to the MILDEP, CCMD, or Regional Component Command, as appropriate, for the accomplishment of the SCET team technical and/or training mission. SCET team chief responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the duties shown in Table C10.T21.

Table C10.T21. Security Cooperation Education and Training Team Chief Functions

#

Security Cooperation Education and Training Team Chief Functions
(not inclusive)

1

Assign duties to team members to ensure the team mission is accomplished within the prescribed time frame.

2

Submit request and justification of all TDYs required in support of team mission to SCO for review. Requests for out-of-country TDYs must be approved by the SCO.

3

Coordinate annual request for security assistance team funding with SCO prior to submission to MILDEP case manager.

4

Submit requests and/or justification for QOL and/or MS items, and items required to execute the team mission, to the SCO prior to purchase.

5

Establish and maintain supply and/or equipment accountability records for all QOL, MS and mission essential property in accordance with MILDEP directives and procedures. Provide SCO with a copy of property records listing all non-expendable, durable equipment valued at $50.00 or more.

6

Provide SCO with access to team property for the purpose of conducting a physical inventory (at least annually and/or prior to team chief departure from country).

7

Identify problems that may impact team personnel and/or mission to the SCO and the MILDEP.

8

Send copies of receipts and vouchers to the MILDEP, CCMD, and/or designated Regional Component Command, as appropriate, and hold copies on open action files until cleared through accounting and finance channels.

9

Provide annual (for PCS teams) or end of tour (for TDY teams) progress report to the MILDEP, CCMD, and/or designated Regional Component Command, as appropriate, to include a complete listing of personnel/units trained.

10

Prior to departure from country, conduct an AAR with the SCO and assist the SCO in providing inputs into the CCMD TSCMIS.

11

Provide an after-action report within 30 days of completion of the team’s mission. See format provided in the JSCET (AR 12-15/SECNAVINST 4950.4B/AFI 16-105).

C10.23.1. International Military Student Alumni Connectivity and Engagement. DSCA (Defense Security Cooperation University, International Military Training and Education Division (DSCU/IMTE)) Division is the DSCA focal point for DoD International Military Student (IMS) alumni activities.

C10.23.1.1. To further National Defense Strategy (NDS) and National Security Strategy (NSS) objectives, DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) administers and executes the IMS Alumni Connectivity and Engagement (ACE) Program. Consistent with security cooperation authorities and subject to funding availability, the ACE Program ensures early and continuous consideration, engagement, and, where possible, collaboration with Ally and partner alumni and select personnel to advance our shared interests. ACE supports the DoD Action Plan for the Strategic Evaluation of International Professional Military Education (PME); Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 1807.01 (“International Professional Military Education Strategy”) (not for public release), which emphasizes the near and long-term benefits of international PME alumni engagement; as well as the Department of State’s (State’s) annual International Military Education and Training (IMET)-funded Alumni Engagement Seminars.

C10.23.1.2. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) identifies and advocates for DSCA resourcing any DoD-wide required informational technology solutions to support ACE objectives. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) collects and consolidates DoD-wide IMS alumni related data to support the execution of planned DoD alumni engagements. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) supports the development of DSCA policy and implementation guidance related to management of alumni data and the execution of alumni engagements. DSCA (DSCU/IMTE) advises DSCA and DSCU leadership on resourcing and planning decisions associated with the administration of the ACE Program.

C10.23.2. International Military Education and Training Alumni Engagement Seminars. DSCA reviews the annual DoD submissions for State’s IMET-funded Alumni Engagement Seminars. Seminar approval is contingent upon support of broader national strategy objectives. Seminar locations and target audiences are planned five years in advance, deconflicting locations and dates for all seminars. Inclusion of subject matter, such as Women, Peace and Security; Climate; Civilian Harm Mitigation (CHM) and Response; Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) professional development; etc., are developed in collaboration with the National Defense University (NDU), Regional Centers (RC), the Irregular Warfare Center, and other DoD organizations.

Table C10.T22. International Military Education and Training Alumni Engagement Seminar Timeline

Date*

Action

March

Start

Schoolhouse submission to State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (State (PM)) and DSCA for review and coordination.

School houses will submit proposals by email, using State’s proposal form, to State (PM) and DSCA.

April

Start

DSCA reviews submissions and provide recommendations to State (PM).

May

Start

State (PM) approves or rejects proposed IMET-funded seminars. State is responsible for any required IMET-related Congressional Notifications.

No later than October 1

Start

State releases IMET funds.

* Note: Dates may vary depending on the work week each year